Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limits on Federal Habeas Review of State Evidentiary Decisions: Insights from Bey v. Bagley

Limits on Federal Habeas Review of State Evidentiary Decisions: Insights from Bey v. Bagley

Date: Sep 26, 2007
Limits on Federal Habeas Review of State Evidentiary Decisions: Insights from Bey v. Bagley Introduction The case of Gregory L. Bey v. Margaret Bagley, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
No Protected Property Interest in State Procurement Procedures: Analysis of Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. Farris

No Protected Property Interest in State Procurement Procedures: Analysis of Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. Farris

Date: Sep 26, 2007
No Protected Property Interest in State Procurement Procedures: Analysis of Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. Farris (6th Cir. 2007) Introduction Experimental Holdings, Inc. v. John R. Farris is a...
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial: The Role of Medical Opinions and Credibility Assessments in Cruse v. Commissioner of Social Security

Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial: The Role of Medical Opinions and Credibility Assessments in Cruse v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Sep 25, 2007
Affirmation of Social Security Disability Denial: The Role of Medical Opinions and Credibility Assessments in Cruse v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the landmark case of Kimberly L....
United States v. Ross: Upholding Bank Fraud Convictions and Reinforcing Sentencing Protocols under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(i)(3)(B)

United States v. Ross: Upholding Bank Fraud Convictions and Reinforcing Sentencing Protocols under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(i)(3)(B)

Date: Sep 22, 2007
United States v. Ross: Upholding Bank Fraud Convictions and Reinforcing Sentencing Protocols under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(i)(3)(B) Introduction In the landmark case, United States of America v. Anthony H....
Preclusion of Promissory Estoppel Claims in the Presence of an Express Contract: Sparton's v. Util-Link Decision

Preclusion of Promissory Estoppel Claims in the Presence of an Express Contract: Sparton's v. Util-Link Decision

Date: Sep 22, 2007
Preclusion of Promissory Estoppel Claims in the Presence of an Express Contract: Sparton's v. Util-Link Decision Introduction The case of Sparton Technology, Inc. v. Util-Link, LLC, and National...
Secondary Meaning Presumption Affirmed for Geographically Descriptive Marks: Leelanau Wine Cellars v. Black Red

Secondary Meaning Presumption Affirmed for Geographically Descriptive Marks: Leelanau Wine Cellars v. Black Red

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Secondary Meaning Presumption Affirmed for Geographically Descriptive Marks: Leelanau Wine Cellars v. Black Red Introduction The case of Leelanau Wine Cellars, Ltd. v. Black Red, Inc., decided by the...
Establishing Standing in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Insights from Loren v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Establishing Standing in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Insights from Loren v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Establishing Standing in ERISA Fiduciary Duty Claims: Insights from Loren v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan 1. Introduction Loren v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 505 F.3d 598 (6th Cir....
Clarifying the Standards for Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation Cases: Medders v. City of Elyria

Clarifying the Standards for Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation Cases: Medders v. City of Elyria

Date: Sep 20, 2007
Clarifying the Standards for Qualified Immunity in First Amendment Retaliation Cases: Medders v. City of Elyria Introduction Medders v. City of Elyria is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Standards for Establishing Pretext in Title VII National Origin Discrimination: Insights from ABDULNOUR v. CAMPBELL SOUP

Standards for Establishing Pretext in Title VII National Origin Discrimination: Insights from ABDULNOUR v. CAMPBELL SOUP

Date: Sep 20, 2007
Standards for Establishing Pretext in Title VII National Origin Discrimination: Insights from ABDULNOUR v. CAMPBELL SOUP Introduction The appellate case Sarmad Abdulnour v. Campbell Soup Supply...
Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Post-Gonzalez: Insights from United States v. Carter

Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Post-Gonzalez: Insights from United States v. Carter

Date: Sep 12, 2007
Interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Post-Gonzalez: Insights from United States v. Carter Introduction United States v. Wayne Carter, 500 F.3d 486 (6th Cir. 2007), serves as a pivotal case in...
Substantial Evidence in Disability Termination: Kennedy v. Astree

Substantial Evidence in Disability Termination: Kennedy v. Astree

Date: Sep 8, 2007
Substantial Evidence in Disability Termination: Kennedy v. Astree Introduction The case of Rachel Kennedy v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security (247 F. App'x 761) centers on the...
Substantial Legal Interest Required for Intervention: Sixth Circuit's Decision in COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION v. GRANHOLM

Substantial Legal Interest Required for Intervention: Sixth Circuit's Decision in COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION v. GRANHOLM

Date: Sep 7, 2007
Substantial Legal Interest Required for Intervention: Sixth Circuit's Decision in COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION v. GRANHOLM Introduction The case of COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION v....
Three-Strikes Rule Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Affirmed in Dennis Pointer v. Reginald Wilkinson

Three-Strikes Rule Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Affirmed in Dennis Pointer v. Reginald Wilkinson

Date: Sep 7, 2007
Three-Strikes Rule Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) Affirmed in Dennis Pointer v. Reginald Wilkinson Introduction The case of Dennis Pointer v. Reginald Wilkinson et al. addresses a critical aspect of the...
Enhancing Particularity Standards in False Claims Act Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.

Enhancing Particularity Standards in False Claims Act Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.

Date: Sep 7, 2007
Enhancing Particularity Standards in False Claims Act Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc. Introduction The case of Sean Bledsoe v. Community Health...
Girts v. Yanai: Enhancing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Girts v. Yanai: Enhancing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Sep 6, 2007
Girts v. Yanai: Enhancing Protections Against Prosecutorial Misconduct and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Case: Robert Girts, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Chris Yanai, Warden,...
Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler

Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler

Date: Sep 6, 2007
Indigent Defendants Lacking Choice-of-Counsel Right: Insights from Daniels v. Laffler Introduction Daniels v. Laffler is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent

Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Sep 5, 2007
Sixth Amendment Defense Rights and Habeas Corpus: FERENSIC v. BIRKETT Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction FERENSIC v. BIRKETT (501 F.3d 469) is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc.

Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc.

Date: Sep 5, 2007
Affirmation of Arbitration Award: Strict Standards for Proving Fraud Under FAA §10(a) in Ty Ke v. Carty Company, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Ty Kevin Bauer v. Carty Company, Inc., the...
Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695

Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695

Date: Sep 1, 2007
Reaffirming Burden-Shifting and Evidence Standards in Title VII Discrimination Claims: Analysis of Olin Clay v. UPS, Sixth Circuit, 501 F.3d 695 Introduction The case of Olin Clay, Marie Moss, Marcus...
Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments

Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments

Date: Aug 31, 2007
Sixth Circuit Reinforces First Amendment Protections for Exotic Performers in Liquor-Licensed Establishments Introduction In the landmark case of Hamilton's Bogarts, Inc.; Kathleen Polzin v. State of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert