Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Proportionality Claims: Smith v. Morgan Establishes New Precedent

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Proportionality Claims: Smith v. Morgan Establishes New Precedent

Date: Mar 30, 2010
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Proportionality Claims: Smith v. Morgan Establishes New Precedent Introduction Thomas D. Smith v. Jack Morgan, Warden is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Da v. d MARSICO

Reversal of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Da v. d MARSICO

Date: Mar 26, 2010
Reversal of Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Da v. d MARSICO Introduction In Da v. d MARSICO, Plaintiff-Appellant David Marsico challenged the summary judgment granted in favor of...
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Da v. Nesser, Jr.

Procedural Default and Exhaustion of Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Da v. Nesser, Jr.

Date: Mar 26, 2010
Procedural Default and Exhaustion of Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Analysis of Da v. Nesser, Jr. Introduction The case of Da v. d A. Nesser, Jr., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Thompson v. Belmont Correctional Institution: Reversing Habeas Relief Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Thompson v. Belmont Correctional Institution: Reversing Habeas Relief Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Mar 19, 2010
Thompson v. Belmont Correctional Institution: Reversing Habeas Relief Due to Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction In the case of Mark Thompson, Jr. v. Warden, Belmont Correctional...
Retention of Jurisdiction in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Moore v. USPS

Retention of Jurisdiction in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Moore v. USPS

Date: Mar 18, 2010
Retention of Jurisdiction in Settlement Agreements: Insights from Moore v. USPS 1. Introduction Moore v. United States Postal Service et al., 369 F. App'x 712 (6th Cir. 2010), is a seminal case that...
Indeterminate Sentencing in Michigan Upholds Blakely-Apprendi Standards: Montes v. Trombley

Indeterminate Sentencing in Michigan Upholds Blakely-Apprendi Standards: Montes v. Trombley

Date: Mar 18, 2010
Indeterminate Sentencing in Michigan Upholds Blakely-Apprendi Standards: Montes v. Trombley Introduction In Oscar Montes v. Jan Trombley, 599 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2010), the United States Court of...
Res Judicata Reinforced: Buck v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Res Judicata Reinforced: Buck v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School

Date: Mar 18, 2010
Res Judicata Reinforced: Buck v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School Introduction In the landmark case Nahzy Buck v. Thomas M. Cooley Law School, 597 F.3d 812 (6th Cir. 2010), the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting in Money Laundering: United States v. Bronzino

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting in Money Laundering: United States v. Bronzino

Date: Mar 17, 2010
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting in Money Laundering: United States v. Bronzino Introduction United States v. Vincenzo Bronzino, 598 F.3d 276 (6th Cir. 2010), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
Waiver of Joinder and Sentencing Procedures: United States v. Wallace

Waiver of Joinder and Sentencing Procedures: United States v. Wallace

Date: Mar 17, 2010
Waiver of Joinder and Sentencing Procedures: United States v. Wallace Introduction United States of America v. Barbara J. Wallace, 597 F.3d 794 (6th Cir. 2010), addresses significant legal questions...
Res Judicata and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases: Analysis of McCoy v. State of Michigan

Res Judicata and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases: Analysis of McCoy v. State of Michigan

Date: Mar 13, 2010
Res Judicata and Sovereign Immunity in Employment Discrimination Cases: Analysis of McCoy v. State of Michigan Introduction The case of Freddie McCoy v. State of Michigan presents a significant...
Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Hillerich Bradsby Co.: Reimbursement Rights Under Reservation of Rights

Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Hillerich Bradsby Co.: Reimbursement Rights Under Reservation of Rights

Date: Mar 13, 2010
Travelers Property Casualty Co. v. Hillerich Bradsby Co.: Reimbursement Rights Under Reservation of Rights Introduction The case of Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, fka The Travelers...
Exigent Circumstances and Excessive Force in Home Arrests: SCHREIBER v. MOE

Exigent Circumstances and Excessive Force in Home Arrests: SCHREIBER v. MOE

Date: Mar 5, 2010
Exigent Circumstances and Excessive Force in Home Arrests: SCHREIBER v. MOE Introduction James Warren Schreiber v. Officer William Moe and City of Grand Rapids is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Sixth Circuit Affirms Statute of Limitations: No Relation Back for Newly Added Plaintiffs and Discovery Rule Inapplicable

Sixth Circuit Affirms Statute of Limitations: No Relation Back for Newly Added Plaintiffs and Discovery Rule Inapplicable

Date: Mar 4, 2010
Sixth Circuit Affirms Statute of Limitations: No Relation Back for Newly Added Plaintiffs and Discovery Rule Inapplicable Introduction In the appellate case William Harris Asher, et al. v. Unarco...
Comprehensive Commentary on Donald Norman v. Michael J. Astrue

Comprehensive Commentary on Donald Norman v. Michael J. Astrue

Date: Mar 2, 2010
Ensuring Comprehensive Evaluation of Obesity in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Donald Norman v. Michael J. Astrue Introduction In the landmark case Donald Norman v. Michael J....
Revisiting THE OREGON Rule: Comparative Negligence in Admiralty Law

Revisiting THE OREGON Rule: Comparative Negligence in Admiralty Law

Date: Feb 26, 2010
Revisiting THE OREGON Rule: Comparative Negligence in Admiralty Law Introduction In the case of Bessemer Lake Erie Railroad Company and the Pittsburgh and Conneaut Dock Company v. Seaway Marine...
Establishing the Significance of Residual Functional Capacity in SSI and DIB Claims: Wright-Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security

Establishing the Significance of Residual Functional Capacity in SSI and DIB Claims: Wright-Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Feb 24, 2010
Establishing the Significance of Residual Functional Capacity in SSI and DIB Claims: Wright-Hines v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction The case of Angela Wright-Hines v. Commissioner of...
Miranda Rights and Harmless Error: Ke v. Tolliver Establishes Legal Precedent in Admissibility of Statements

Miranda Rights and Harmless Error: Ke v. Tolliver Establishes Legal Precedent in Admissibility of Statements

Date: Feb 23, 2010
Miranda Rights and Harmless Error: Ke v. Tolliver Establishes Legal Precedent in Admissibility of Statements Introduction In the landmark case of Ke v. Tolliver, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Drug-Related Premises Maintenance under 21 U.S.C. §856(a)(1): Analysis of United States v. Lord Shawn Russell

Affirmation of Drug-Related Premises Maintenance under 21 U.S.C. §856(a)(1): Analysis of United States v. Lord Shawn Russell

Date: Feb 20, 2010
Affirmation of Drug-Related Premises Maintenance under 21 U.S.C. §856(a)(1): Analysis of United States v. Lord Shawn Russell Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Lord Shawn...
Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability: Malice and Sufficiency of Evidence in Stewart v. Wolfenbarger

Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability: Malice and Sufficiency of Evidence in Stewart v. Wolfenbarger

Date: Feb 20, 2010
Affirming Aiding and Abetting Liability: Malice and Sufficiency of Evidence in Stewart v. Wolfenbarger Introduction Stewart v. Wolfenbarger (595 F.3d 647, 6th Cir. 2010) is a significant appellate...
Enhanced Scrutiny of Ex Post Facto Claims in Parole Law Reforms

Enhanced Scrutiny of Ex Post Facto Claims in Parole Law Reforms

Date: Feb 19, 2010
Enhanced Scrutiny of Ex Post Facto Claims in Parole Law Reforms Introduction The case of Kenneth Foster, et al. v. Sharee Booker, et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert