Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirming §1983 Jurisprudence for Procedural Rights in Indigency Hearings: Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender Commission Introduction In Michael Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies §3553(a)(6): National Uniformity Over Co-Defendant Disparities in Sentencing Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kossie Lamon Simmons (501 F.3d 620)...
Direct Effect Requirement in FSIA's Commercial Activity Exception Affirmed Introduction The case of American Telecom Co., L.L.C.; American Telecom Group-USA, L.L.C. v. Republic of Lebanon addresses...
Affirmation of Rational Basis Scrutiny in Tennessee's Driver License Law: LULAC v. Bredesen Introduction The case of League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. Bredesen explores the...
Application of the Schlup Standard for Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McCray v. Vasbinder Introduction The case of Oyd Collins McCray v. David Vasbinder navigates the intricate...
Sixth Circuit Determines One-Day In-School Suspension as De Minimis, Negating Due Process Claim Introduction In the case of William Laney, indi v. Dually (501 F.3d 577, 6th Cir. 2007), the United...
Affirmation of Garcetti: Employee Speech Pursuant to Official Duties Not Protected Under First Amendment Introduction In the case of Denise Weisbarth v. Geauga Park District, the United States Court...
State Action and First Amendment Access Claims: Insights from S.H.A.R.K. v. Metro Parks Introduction S.H.A.R.K.; Stephen Hindi v. Metro Parks Serving Summit County, 499 F.3d 553 (6th Cir. 2007), is a...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial in O'Hara v. Brigano: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Standards for Brady Violations Introduction The case of Henry O'Hara v. Anthony Brigano, Warden (499 F.3d...
Substantial-Federal-Question Doctrine in MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP. (2007) Introduction MIKULSKI v. CENTERIOR ENERGY CORP. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Substantial Evidence and Remand Standards in SSDI Appeals: Paul W. Bass II v. McMahon Introduction In the landmark case of Paul W. Bass II v. Linda S. McMahon (499 F.3d 506), adjudicated by the...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for FMLA Retaliation Claims: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bryson v. Regis Corp. Introduction In the landmark case Karen Bryson v. Regis Corp., the United States...
Affirmation of Dismissal: Subject Matter Jurisdiction and the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Davis v. United States Introduction In the case of John J. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. United States of...
Affirmation of District Court's Evidentiary Rulings in United States v. Cody: Implications for Joinder and Evidence Admissibility Introduction In United States of America v. Talmadge Cody, 498 F.3d...
Speedy Trial Rights Affirmed in United States v. Brown 1. Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Clarence Howard Brown, 498 F.3d 523 (6th Cir. 2007), the United States Court of...
Use of Acquitted Conduct in Sentencing Post-Booker: Analysis of United States v. Mendez Introduction United States v. Victor Mendez (498 F.3d 423, 6th Cir. 2007) is a pivotal case addressing the...
Harmless-Error Determination in Capital Sentencing: The Wilson v. Mitchell Precedent Introduction Wilson v. Mitchell, 498 F.3d 491 (6th Cir. 2007), is a pivotal case in the landscape of capital...
Housing Discrimination Pleading Standards: Lindsays v. Yates Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction In Lindlays, Sr. & Tina Lindsay v. Brent Yates et al. (498 F.3d 434), the United States Court...
Clarifying Coverage: Civil Authority vs. Contingent Business Interruption in Insurance Policies – Penton Media v. Affiliated FM Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Penton Media, Inc. v. Affiliated...
Constructive Amendments in Criminal Indictments: An In-Depth Analysis of United States v. Budd (496 F.3d 517) Introduction United States v. Michael J. Budd, 496 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 2007), presents a...