Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirming Disability Denial Despite Procedural Record Errors: Wilson v. SSA

Affirming Disability Denial Despite Procedural Record Errors: Wilson v. SSA

Date: May 30, 2008
Affirming Disability Denial Despite Procedural Record Errors: Wilson v. SSA Introduction Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in UAHC Securities Fraud Case

Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in UAHC Securities Fraud Case

Date: May 28, 2008
Clarifying Materiality and Duty to Disclose: Sixth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in UAHC Securities Fraud Case Introduction The case of Gregory Zaluski et al. v. United American Healthcare Corporation...
Oral Sentence Supremacy and Statutory Limits in Sentencing: United States v. Penson

Oral Sentence Supremacy and Statutory Limits in Sentencing: United States v. Penson

Date: May 28, 2008
Oral Sentence Supremacy and Statutory Limits in Sentencing: United States v. Penson Introduction United States v. George W. Penson, III is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming Inmate Protections under the Equal Protection Clause: Brand v. Motley et al.

Affirming Inmate Protections under the Equal Protection Clause: Brand v. Motley et al.

Date: May 24, 2008
Affirming Inmate Protections under the Equal Protection Clause: Brand v. Motley et al. (526 F.3d 921) Introduction The case of Dewayne Brand v. John D. Motley; Kathy Litteral; Michelle Vance, decided...
Waiver of Appeal on Sufficiency of Evidence in Conditional Pleas: Insights from United States v. Martin

Waiver of Appeal on Sufficiency of Evidence in Conditional Pleas: Insights from United States v. Martin

Date: May 24, 2008
Waiver of Appeal on Sufficiency of Evidence in Conditional Pleas: Insights from United States v. Martin Introduction United States of America v. Kenneth Martin, 526 F.3d 926 (6th Cir. 2008), is a...
Affirmation of Non-Preclusive Effect of Arbitration in Statutory Disability Claims: Nance v. Goodyear

Affirmation of Non-Preclusive Effect of Arbitration in Statutory Disability Claims: Nance v. Goodyear

Date: May 24, 2008
Affirmation of Non-Preclusive Effect of Arbitration in Statutory Disability Claims: Nance v. Goodyear Introduction The case of Marcia B. Nance v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, 527 F.3d 539 (6th...
Affirming Trial Court Primacy in Batson Challenges with New Evidence: Harris v. Haebelin

Affirming Trial Court Primacy in Batson Challenges with New Evidence: Harris v. Haebelin

Date: May 23, 2008
Affirming Trial Court Primacy in Batson Challenges with New Evidence: Harris v. Haebelin Introduction Harris v. Haebelin, 526 F.3d 903 (6th Cir. 2008), addresses the critical issue of racial...
Standards for Evaluating Prosecutorial Misconduct in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Cristini v. McKee

Standards for Evaluating Prosecutorial Misconduct in Habeas Corpus Appeals: Cristini v. McKee

Date: May 23, 2008
Standards for Evaluating Prosecutorial Misconduct in Habeas Corpus Appeals: James Craig Cristini v. Ken McKee Introduction The case of James Craig Cristini v. Ken McKee (526 F.3d 888) adjudicated by...
Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses: Sixth Circuit Upholds Grand Rapids Ordinance under O'Brien Test

Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses: Sixth Circuit Upholds Grand Rapids Ordinance under O'Brien Test

Date: May 21, 2008
Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses: Sixth Circuit Upholds Grand Rapids Ordinance under O'Brien Test Introduction The case of SENSATIONS, INC.; Lady Godiva's, Inc., and Little Red Barn Adult...
Hostile Work Environment Standards under Title VII: Insights from Bailey v. USF Holland, Inc.

Hostile Work Environment Standards under Title VII: Insights from Bailey v. USF Holland, Inc.

Date: May 17, 2008
Hostile Work Environment Standards under Title VII: Insights from Bobby Bailey and Robert Smith v. USF Holland, Inc. Introduction The appellate case of Bobby Bailey and Robert Smith v. USF Holland,...
Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Parks

Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Parks

Date: May 17, 2008
Severance in Joint Criminal Trials: Insights from United States v. Parks Introduction The case of United States of America v. Varian Malick Parks, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Application of Daubert Standards in Antitrust Class Actions: In re Scrap Metal Antitrust Litigation

Application of Daubert Standards in Antitrust Class Actions: In re Scrap Metal Antitrust Litigation

Date: May 16, 2008
Application of Daubert Standards in Antitrust Class Actions: In re Scrap Metal Antitrust Litigation Introduction In re Scrap Metal Antitrust Litigation, 527 F.3d 517 (6th Cir. 2008), represents a...
Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Statute of Limitations in Humphrey v. U.S. Attorney General's Office and Postal Service

Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Statute of Limitations in Humphrey v. U.S. Attorney General's Office and Postal Service

Date: May 16, 2008
Affirmation of Dismissal Due to Statute of Limitations in Humphrey v. U.S. Attorney General's Office and Postal Service Introduction In the case of Robert J. Humphrey v. United States Attorney...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lockett v. Suardini et al.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lockett v. Suardini et al.

Date: May 15, 2008
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Prisoner's §1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Lockett v. Suardini et al. Introduction In James A. Lockett v. Joseph Suardini, Harry Irvine, Nancy Blackford,...
Marlar v. BWXT Y-12: New Clarifications on Retaliation Claims under the False Claims Act

Marlar v. BWXT Y-12: New Clarifications on Retaliation Claims under the False Claims Act

Date: May 14, 2008
Marlar v. BWXT Y-12: New Clarifications on Retaliation Claims under the False Claims Act Introduction In the landmark case United States of America, ex rel. Claudia Marlar; and Claudia Marlar,...
Sovereign Immunity Confirmed in Escrow Fund Enforcement under the Master Settlement Agreement

Sovereign Immunity Confirmed in Escrow Fund Enforcement under the Master Settlement Agreement

Date: May 14, 2008
Sovereign Immunity Confirmed in Escrow Fund Enforcement under the Master Settlement Agreement Introduction In the appellate decision S M Brands, Inc.; International Tobacco Partners, Ltd. v. Robert...
Duration and Nature of Administrative Segregation: Establishing a Protected Liberty Interest under Due Process

Duration and Nature of Administrative Segregation: Establishing a Protected Liberty Interest under Due Process

Date: May 13, 2008
Duration and Nature of Administrative Segregation: Establishing a Protected Liberty Interest under Due Process Introduction Cary Harden-Bey v. Rutter, et al., 524 F.3d 789 (6th Cir. 2008), is a...
Hague-Visby Rules Affirmed Over COGSA in Multimodal Maritime Contracts: Analyzing ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Ford Motor Company v. ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LTD.

Hague-Visby Rules Affirmed Over COGSA in Multimodal Maritime Contracts: Analyzing ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Ford Motor Company v. ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LTD.

Date: May 9, 2008
Hague-Visby Rules Affirmed Over COGSA in Multimodal Maritime Contracts Introduction In the landmark case ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; Ford Motor Company v. ORIENT OVERSEAS CONTAINER LINE LTD....
Strengthening Antitrust Enforcement on Exclusive-Dealing Arrangements and Frivolous Appeals: B H Medical LLC v. ABP Administration

Strengthening Antitrust Enforcement on Exclusive-Dealing Arrangements and Frivolous Appeals: B H Medical LLC v. ABP Administration

Date: May 8, 2008
Strengthening Antitrust Enforcement on Exclusive-Dealing Arrangements and Frivolous Appeals: B H Medical LLC v. ABP Administration Introduction The case of B H MEDICAL, L.L.C., a Michigan limited...
Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in FIEGER v. COX (2008)

Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in FIEGER v. COX (2008)

Date: May 7, 2008
Affirmation of Younger Abstention Doctrine in FIEGER v. COX (2008) Introduction In the case of Fieger et al. v. Cox et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert