Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying Jurisdiction for Mixed IRS Appeals: Wagenknecht v. United States

Clarifying Jurisdiction for Mixed IRS Appeals: Wagenknecht v. United States

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Clarifying Jurisdiction for Mixed IRS Appeals: Wagenknecht v. United States 1. Title Clarifying Jurisdiction for Mixed IRS Appeals: Wagenknecht v. United States 2. Introduction The case Carl R....
Snapp v. Ford Motor Co.: Enhancing the Particularity Standard in False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions

Snapp v. Ford Motor Co.: Enhancing the Particularity Standard in False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions

Date: Jul 10, 2008
Snapp v. Ford Motor Co.: Enhancing the Particularity Standard in False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions Introduction In UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Snapp, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FORD MOTOR...
Establishing the Consumer Expectation Test in Product Liability: An Analysis of Sigler v. American Honda Motor Co., 6th Cir. 2008

Establishing the Consumer Expectation Test in Product Liability: An Analysis of Sigler v. American Honda Motor Co., 6th Cir. 2008

Date: Jul 9, 2008
Establishing the Consumer Expectation Test in Product Liability: An Analysis of Sigler v. American Honda Motor Co., 6th Cir. 2008 Introduction In the landmark case of Shelly Sigler v. American Honda...
Affirmation of Convictions in Fourth Amendment Context: Pearce v. United States

Affirmation of Convictions in Fourth Amendment Context: Pearce v. United States

Date: Jul 4, 2008
Affirmation of Convictions in Fourth Amendment Context: Pearce v. United States Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Carl Pearce and Curtis Johnson, the United States Court of...
Establishing a New Framework for Mixed-Motive Title VII Claims at Summary Judgment

Establishing a New Framework for Mixed-Motive Title VII Claims at Summary Judgment

Date: Jul 4, 2008
Establishing a New Framework for Mixed-Motive Title VII Claims at Summary Judgment Introduction Todd A. White v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, 533 F.3d 381 (6th Cir. 2008), addresses critical issues...
Affirmation of School's Adequate Response to Disability-Based Peer Harassment under ADA and Section 504: S.S. v. EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY

Affirmation of School's Adequate Response to Disability-Based Peer Harassment under ADA and Section 504: S.S. v. EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY

Date: Jul 3, 2008
Affirmation of School's Adequate Response to Disability-Based Peer Harassment under ADA and Section 504: S.S. v. EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY Introduction In the appellate case of S.S., a minor, by...
Limits on the Use of Physical Restraints During Trial Established in Miller v. United States

Limits on the Use of Physical Restraints During Trial Established in Miller v. United States

Date: Jul 2, 2008
Limits on the Use of Physical Restraints During Trial Established in Miller v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Shawn Joseph Miller, adjudicated by the...
Qualified Immunity Limited in Warrantless Home Searches: Raahkiim EL BEY v. Roop et al.

Qualified Immunity Limited in Warrantless Home Searches: Raahkiim EL BEY v. Roop et al.

Date: Jul 2, 2008
Qualified Immunity Limited in Warrantless Home Searches: Raahkiim EL BEY v. Roop et al. Introduction The case of Raahkiim EL BEY v. Tim ROOP, Matt Miller, Darrin Barlow, Diane L. Bryan, and William...
Statute of Limitations and Sovereign Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ohio Midland v. Ohio Department of Transportation

Statute of Limitations and Sovereign Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ohio Midland v. Ohio Department of Transportation

Date: Jul 2, 2008
Statute of Limitations and Sovereign Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ohio Midland, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Transportation Introduction The case of Ohio Midland,...
Limitations on Sentencing Reconsideration under Rule 35(a): Affirmation of Original Sentences in the Absence of Clear Error

Limitations on Sentencing Reconsideration under Rule 35(a): Affirmation of Original Sentences in the Absence of Clear Error

Date: Jun 28, 2008
Limitations on Sentencing Reconsideration under Rule 35(a): Affirmation of Original Sentences in the Absence of Clear Error Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America v. James E. Houston,...
Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Estate of Thomas Kirby v. St. Clair County Sheriff's Department

Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Estate of Thomas Kirby v. St. Clair County Sheriff's Department

Date: Jun 28, 2008
Affirmation of Denial of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Estate of Thomas Kirby v. St. Clair County Sheriff's Department Introduction The case of The Estate of Thomas Kirby and Brenda...
Affirming Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Department

Affirming Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Department

Date: Jun 27, 2008
Affirming Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute: Insights from Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Department Introduction The case of Mark Schafer et al. v. City of Defiance Police Department et al....
Mandamus Relief in Electronic Discovery: In re John B. et al. v. Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration

Mandamus Relief in Electronic Discovery: In re John B. et al. v. Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration

Date: Jun 27, 2008
Mandamus Relief in Electronic Discovery: In re John B. et al. v. Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration Introduction This case, In re John B.; Carrie G.; Joshua M.; Meagan A.; Erica A.,...
Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance: Defining the Scope of Protected Activity in Employment Retaliation

Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance: Defining the Scope of Protected Activity in Employment Retaliation

Date: Jun 25, 2008
Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance: Defining the Scope of Protected Activity in Employment Retaliation Introduction Niswander v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, 529 F.3d 714 (6th Cir. 2008), is a...
Reaffirming Employer's Affirmative Defense in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII

Reaffirming Employer's Affirmative Defense in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII

Date: Jun 25, 2008
Reaffirming Employer's Affirmative Defense in Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII Introduction The case of Deborah Thornton v. Federal Express Corporation d/b/a FedEx Express (530 F.3d...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Henry D. Grinter v. Chad Knight

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Henry D. Grinter v. Chad Knight

Date: Jun 20, 2008
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Henry D. Grinter v. Chad Knight Introduction The case of Henry D. Grinter v. Chad Knight, 532 F.3d 567 (6th...
Enhancing Due Process Protections for Voluntary Psychiatric Patients: Patricia Lanman v. Hinson et al.

Enhancing Due Process Protections for Voluntary Psychiatric Patients: Patricia Lanman v. Hinson et al.

Date: Jun 18, 2008
Enhancing Due Process Protections for Voluntary Psychiatric Patients: Patricia Lanman v. Hinson et al. Introduction The case of Patricia Lanman, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Hinson, James Siegfried,...
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Pretrial Detention

Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Pretrial Detention

Date: Jun 11, 2008
Sixth Circuit Clarifies Standards for Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Pretrial Detention Introduction The case of Shaun Leary v. Livingston County et al. adjudicated by the United States...
Enforcement of Non-Commercial NCAA Rules Not Subject to Sherman Act: Sixth Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Bassett Case

Enforcement of Non-Commercial NCAA Rules Not Subject to Sherman Act: Sixth Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Bassett Case

Date: Jun 10, 2008
Enforcement of Non-Commercial NCAA Rules Not Subject to Sherman Act: Sixth Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Bassett Case Introduction The case of Claude L. Bassett v. The National Collegiate Athletic...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Applied in Bar Admission Denial: Lawrence v. Welch

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Applied in Bar Admission Denial: Lawrence v. Welch

Date: Jun 4, 2008
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Applied in Bar Admission Denial: Lawrence v. Welch Introduction The case of Frank J. LAWRENCE, Jr. v. Janet K. WELCH, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert