Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Da v. Ayers: Affirming Sixth Amendment Protections Against Government-Induced Elicitation of Incriminating Statements Introduction Da v. Ayers is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Limitation on Affirmative Defenses Based on Regulatory Reliance: Comprehensive Analysis of In re NM Holdings Company, LLC et al., 6th Circuit, 2010 Introduction The case of Donna J. Garrett et al. v....
Boseley v. SSA: Upholding Substantial Evidence Standards in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments Introduction Boseley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 397 F. App'x 195 (6th Cir....
Affirming Rational Basis: Northville Downs v. Granholm and the Constitutionality of Michigan's Gambling Regulation Introduction In Northville Downs, Plaintiff-Appellant, Oil Capital Race Venture,...
Clarifying 'Intentional or Willful' Standards under the Privacy Act: Beaven v. U.S. Department of Justice Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Ellen Beaven et al. v. United States Department of...
Zamora v. Astrue: Reinforcing the Weight of Treating Physicians' Opinions in Disability Claims Introduction Case: Javier Zamora v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Court: United...
Functional Illiteracy Must Be Considered in Disability Benefit Determinations: Ambrose v. Astrue Introduction In Neil Ambrose v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Affirming Procedural Defaults and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards: Hoffner v. Bradshaw Introduction The case of Timothy Hoffner v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden, appealed before the United States...
Reaffirming the Strong Inference Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation Introduction The case of LOUISIANA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; Debra Swiman, indi v. Ernst Young, LLP...
Use of Juvenile Convictions in Enhancing Federal Drug Sentences: Analysis of United States v. Graham Introduction The case of United States of America v. Donald Graham (622 F.3d 445) adjudicated by...
Diversity Jurisdiction vs. Burford Abstention: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Cleveland Housing Renewal Project, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company (621 F.3d 554, 6th Cir....
Affirmation of Competency Standards and Non-Retroactivity of Sentencing Laws in U.S. v. Carradine Introduction United States of America v. Allen Lee Carradine is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Protections of Informal and Oral Petitions under the First Amendment: Da v. d HOLZEMER Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. d HOLZEMER; Downtown Buggy, LLC, the United States...
Affirmation of Competency and Jury Selection Standards in United States v. Willard Howard Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Willard Howard (621 F.3d 433), adjudicated by the...
POST v. BRADSHAW: Standards for Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Sentencing Introduction Parties Involved: Ronald Post (Petitioner-Appellant) v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden...
Admissibility of Speculative Expert Testimony Under Rule 702: Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Introduction In the case of Jeff Tamraz and Terry Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Company and Others, adjudicated...
合法性新标准:第六巡回上诉法院在Johnson案中对无合理怀疑的拘留与搜查政策的裁定 引言 在 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice T. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant 案中,第六巡回上诉法院于2010年9月8日就Maurice T....
Exclusion of Irrelevant Damages Evidence in Fraud and Good Faith Claims: Gresh v. Waste Services of America Introduction The case of Gerald Gresh v. Waste Services of America, Inc. involves...
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the case of Roger D. Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security, decided by the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Ohio Death Sentence in McGuire v. State: Implications for Capital Habeas Relief Introduction In the landmark case of Dennis B. McGuire v. State of Ohio; Betty Mitchell, decided...