Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

6th Circuit Case Commentaries

Da v. Ayers: Affirming Sixth Amendment Protections Against Government-Induced Elicitation of Incriminating Statements

Da v. Ayers: Affirming Sixth Amendment Protections Against Government-Induced Elicitation of Incriminating Statements

Date: Oct 6, 2010
Da v. Ayers: Affirming Sixth Amendment Protections Against Government-Induced Elicitation of Incriminating Statements Introduction Da v. Ayers is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Limitation on Affirmative Defenses Based on Regulatory Reliance: Comprehensive Analysis of In re NM Holdings Company, LLC et al., 6th Circuit, 2010

Limitation on Affirmative Defenses Based on Regulatory Reliance: Comprehensive Analysis of In re NM Holdings Company, LLC et al., 6th Circuit, 2010

Date: Oct 1, 2010
Limitation on Affirmative Defenses Based on Regulatory Reliance: Comprehensive Analysis of In re NM Holdings Company, LLC et al., 6th Circuit, 2010 Introduction The case of Donna J. Garrett et al. v....
Boseley v. SSA: Upholding Substantial Evidence Standards in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments

Boseley v. SSA: Upholding Substantial Evidence Standards in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments

Date: Oct 1, 2010
Boseley v. SSA: Upholding Substantial Evidence Standards in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments Introduction Boseley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 397 F. App'x 195 (6th Cir....
Affirming Rational Basis: Northville Downs v. Granholm and the Constitutionality of Michigan's Gambling Regulation

Affirming Rational Basis: Northville Downs v. Granholm and the Constitutionality of Michigan's Gambling Regulation

Date: Sep 28, 2010
Affirming Rational Basis: Northville Downs v. Granholm and the Constitutionality of Michigan's Gambling Regulation Introduction In Northville Downs, Plaintiff-Appellant, Oil Capital Race Venture,...
Clarifying 'Intentional or Willful' Standards under the Privacy Act: Beaven v. U.S. Department of Justice

Clarifying 'Intentional or Willful' Standards under the Privacy Act: Beaven v. U.S. Department of Justice

Date: Sep 28, 2010
Clarifying 'Intentional or Willful' Standards under the Privacy Act: Beaven v. U.S. Department of Justice Introduction In the landmark case of Mary Ellen Beaven et al. v. United States Department of...
Zamora v. Astrue: Reinforcing the Weight of Treating Physicians' Opinions in Disability Claims

Zamora v. Astrue: Reinforcing the Weight of Treating Physicians' Opinions in Disability Claims

Date: Sep 28, 2010
Zamora v. Astrue: Reinforcing the Weight of Treating Physicians' Opinions in Disability Claims Introduction Case: Javier Zamora v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security Court: United...
Functional Illiteracy Must Be Considered in Disability Benefit Determinations: Ambrose v. Astrue

Functional Illiteracy Must Be Considered in Disability Benefit Determinations: Ambrose v. Astrue

Date: Sep 25, 2010
Functional Illiteracy Must Be Considered in Disability Benefit Determinations: Ambrose v. Astrue Introduction In Neil Ambrose v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, the United States...
Affirming Procedural Defaults and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards: Hoffner v. Bradshaw

Affirming Procedural Defaults and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards: Hoffner v. Bradshaw

Date: Sep 24, 2010
Affirming Procedural Defaults and Upholding Capital Sentencing Standards: Hoffner v. Bradshaw Introduction The case of Timothy Hoffner v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden, appealed before the United States...
Reaffirming the Strong Inference Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation

Reaffirming the Strong Inference Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation

Date: Sep 23, 2010
Reaffirming the Strong Inference Standard for Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation Introduction The case of LOUISIANA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM; Debra Swiman, indi v. Ernst Young, LLP...
Use of Juvenile Convictions in Enhancing Federal Drug Sentences: Analysis of United States v. Graham

Use of Juvenile Convictions in Enhancing Federal Drug Sentences: Analysis of United States v. Graham

Date: Sep 22, 2010
Use of Juvenile Convictions in Enhancing Federal Drug Sentences: Analysis of United States v. Graham Introduction The case of United States of America v. Donald Graham (622 F.3d 445) adjudicated by...
Diversity Jurisdiction vs. Burford Abstention: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Diversity Jurisdiction vs. Burford Abstention: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent

Date: Sep 21, 2010
Diversity Jurisdiction vs. Burford Abstention: Sixth Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Cleveland Housing Renewal Project, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company (621 F.3d 554, 6th Cir....
Affirmation of Competency Standards and Non-Retroactivity of Sentencing Laws in U.S. v. Carradine

Affirmation of Competency Standards and Non-Retroactivity of Sentencing Laws in U.S. v. Carradine

Date: Sep 21, 2010
Affirmation of Competency Standards and Non-Retroactivity of Sentencing Laws in U.S. v. Carradine Introduction United States of America v. Allen Lee Carradine is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Protections of Informal and Oral Petitions under the First Amendment: Da v. d HOLZEMER

Clarifying the Protections of Informal and Oral Petitions under the First Amendment: Da v. d HOLZEMER

Date: Sep 16, 2010
Clarifying the Protections of Informal and Oral Petitions under the First Amendment: Da v. d HOLZEMER Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. d HOLZEMER; Downtown Buggy, LLC, the United States...
Affirmation of Competency and Jury Selection Standards in United States v. Willard Howard

Affirmation of Competency and Jury Selection Standards in United States v. Willard Howard

Date: Sep 15, 2010
Affirmation of Competency and Jury Selection Standards in United States v. Willard Howard Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Willard Howard (621 F.3d 433), adjudicated by the...
POST v. BRADSHAW: Standards for Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Sentencing

POST v. BRADSHAW: Standards for Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Sentencing

Date: Sep 14, 2010
POST v. BRADSHAW: Standards for Habeas Review of Ineffective Assistance Claims in Capital Sentencing Introduction Parties Involved: Ronald Post (Petitioner-Appellant) v. Margaret Bradshaw, Warden...
Admissibility of Speculative Expert Testimony Under Rule 702: Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric

Admissibility of Speculative Expert Testimony Under Rule 702: Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric

Date: Sep 9, 2010
Admissibility of Speculative Expert Testimony Under Rule 702: Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Introduction In the case of Jeff Tamraz and Terry Tamraz v. Lincoln Electric Company and Others, adjudicated...
合法性新标准:第六巡回上诉法院在Johnson案中对无合理怀疑的拘留与搜查政策的裁定

合法性新标准:第六巡回上诉法院在Johnson案中对无合理怀疑的拘留与搜查政策的裁定

Date: Sep 9, 2010
合法性新标准:第六巡回上诉法院在Johnson案中对无合理怀疑的拘留与搜查政策的裁定 引言 在 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Maurice T. Johnson, Defendant-Appellant 案中,第六巡回上诉法院于2010年9月8日就Maurice T....
Exclusion of Irrelevant Damages Evidence in Fraud and Good Faith Claims: Gresh v. Waste Services of America

Exclusion of Irrelevant Damages Evidence in Fraud and Good Faith Claims: Gresh v. Waste Services of America

Date: Sep 2, 2010
Exclusion of Irrelevant Damages Evidence in Fraud and Good Faith Claims: Gresh v. Waste Services of America Introduction The case of Gerald Gresh v. Waste Services of America, Inc. involves...
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: Sep 1, 2010
Substantial Evidence Standard Affirmed in Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security Introduction In the case of Roger D. Tilley v. Commissioner of Social Security, decided by the United States Court...
Sixth Circuit Upholds Ohio Death Sentence in McGuire v. State: Implications for Capital Habeas Relief

Sixth Circuit Upholds Ohio Death Sentence in McGuire v. State: Implications for Capital Habeas Relief

Date: Sep 1, 2010
Sixth Circuit Upholds Ohio Death Sentence in McGuire v. State: Implications for Capital Habeas Relief Introduction In the landmark case of Dennis B. McGuire v. State of Ohio; Betty Mitchell, decided...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert