Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings

Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings

Date: May 1, 2025
Consistency Mandate for Firearm Findings in §3582(c)(2) Sentence Reduction Proceedings Introduction This commentary examines United States v. Salas, No. 24-10097 (5th Cir. Apr. 30, 2025), in which...
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Robbery and Upholds Texas Robbery as a Crime of Violence

Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Robbery and Upholds Texas Robbery as a Crime of Violence

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Intervening Amendment to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 Redefines Robbery and Upholds Texas Robbery as a Crime of Violence Introduction In United States v. Wickware, No. 24-10519 (5th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025), the...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Knowledge Inference in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation

Affirmation of Circumstantial Knowledge Inference in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Affirmation of Circumstantial Knowledge Inference in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation Introduction United States v. Rodriguez, 5th Cir. No. 24-40031 (Apr. 29, 2025), addresses two consolidated...
Damond v. City of Alexandria: Reaffirming High Bar for §1983 Claims under §1915(e)(2)(B)

Damond v. City of Alexandria: Reaffirming High Bar for §1983 Claims under §1915(e)(2)(B)

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Damond v. City of Alexandria: Reaffirming High Bar for §1983 Claims under §1915(e)(2)(B) Introduction Damond v. City of Alexandria is a Fifth Circuit decision affirming the dismissal of a pro se...
Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction

Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Disjunctive Interpretation of USSG §4C1.1(a)(10): Independent Disqualifiers for Sentence Reduction Introduction United States v. Jones, 24-30236 (5th Cir. Apr. 29, 2025), presents the Fifth Circuit’s...
Circumstantial Inference of Knowledge in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation: United States v. Martinez-Montelongo

Circumstantial Inference of Knowledge in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation: United States v. Martinez-Montelongo

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Circumstantial Inference of Knowledge in Hidden-Compartment Drug Importation: United States v. Martinez-Montelongo Introduction United States v. Martinez-Montelongo is a Fifth Circuit decision issued...
Extension of Traffic Stops for K-9 Sniffs Requires Specific Reasonable Suspicion – Thompson v. Richter

Extension of Traffic Stops for K-9 Sniffs Requires Specific Reasonable Suspicion – Thompson v. Richter

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Extension of Traffic Stops for K-9 Sniffs Requires Specific Reasonable Suspicion Introduction Thompson v. Richter, decided April 29, 2025 by the Fifth Circuit, addresses two interrelated legal...
Validation of Felon-in-Possession Prohibition and Sentencing Cross-Reference for Attempted Murder in United States v. Hernandez

Validation of Felon-in-Possession Prohibition and Sentencing Cross-Reference for Attempted Murder in United States v. Hernandez

Date: Apr 30, 2025
Validation of Felon-in-Possession Prohibition and Sentencing Cross-Reference for Attempted Murder in United States v. Hernandez Introduction United States v. Hernandez (5th Cir. 2025) addresses two...
Strict Enforcement of EEOC Counseling Deadlines and Limits on Continuing Violations in Title VII Claims – Rodriguez v. Duffy

Strict Enforcement of EEOC Counseling Deadlines and Limits on Continuing Violations in Title VII Claims – Rodriguez v. Duffy

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Strict Enforcement of EEOC Counseling Deadlines and Limits on Continuing Violations in Title VII Claims Introduction Rodriguez v. Duffy, decided April 28, 2025 by the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarifying Essential Job Functions and Accommodation Obligations in Post-Pandemic Employment: Ray v. Columbia Brazoria

Clarifying Essential Job Functions and Accommodation Obligations in Post-Pandemic Employment: Ray v. Columbia Brazoria

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Clarifying Essential Job Functions and Accommodation Obligations in Post-Pandemic Employment: Ray v. Columbia Brazoria Introduction In Ray v. Columbia Brazoria Independent School District, No....
Limitations on Vacating Arbitration Awards: FAA Section 10(a)(4) Exclusivity and Manifest Disregard Not a Separate Ground

Limitations on Vacating Arbitration Awards: FAA Section 10(a)(4) Exclusivity and Manifest Disregard Not a Separate Ground

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Limitations on Vacating Arbitration Awards: FAA Section 10(a)(4) Exclusivity and Manifest Disregard Not a Separate Ground Introduction In United States Trinity Energy Services, L.L.C. v. Southeast...
Employer’s Vicarious Liability Limited by Unreported Harassment and Narrow Successor Liability: Noiel v. Roseland Management

Employer’s Vicarious Liability Limited by Unreported Harassment and Narrow Successor Liability: Noiel v. Roseland Management

Date: Apr 29, 2025
Employer’s Vicarious Liability Limited by Unreported Harassment and Narrow Successor Liability: Noiel v. Roseland Management Introduction Noiel v. Roseland Management, decided April 28, 2025 by the...
Permissibility of Upward Variance Based on Policy Disagreement with Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Garcia

Permissibility of Upward Variance Based on Policy Disagreement with Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Garcia

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Permissibility of Upward Variance Based on Policy Disagreement with Sentencing Guidelines: United States v. Garcia Introduction United States v. Garcia is a Fifth Circuit decision rendered on April...
Prisoner Access to Direct-Acting Antivirals and Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: Ricks v. Khan

Prisoner Access to Direct-Acting Antivirals and Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: Ricks v. Khan

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Prisoner Access to Direct-Acting Antivirals and Eighth Amendment Deliberate Indifference: Ricks v. Khan Introduction In Ricks v. Khan, 20-20303 (5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2025), the Fifth Circuit confronted...
Imputed Knowledge Shields Premises Owners: Application of Mississippi Code §11-1-66 in Rose v. Nissan North America

Imputed Knowledge Shields Premises Owners: Application of Mississippi Code §11-1-66 in Rose v. Nissan North America

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Imputed Knowledge Shields Premises Owners: Application of Mississippi Code §11-1-66 in Rose v. Nissan North America Introduction Rose v. Nissan North America, decided April 25, 2025 by the Fifth...
Affirmation of Murder‐for‐Hire and Witness Tampering Standards; Good‐Faith Exception for CSLI: United States v. Age

Affirmation of Murder‐for‐Hire and Witness Tampering Standards; Good‐Faith Exception for CSLI: United States v. Age

Date: Apr 26, 2025
Affirmation of Murder-for-Hire and Witness Tampering Standards; Good-Faith Exception for CSLI: United States v. Age Introduction In United States v. Age (5th Cir. Apr. 25, 2025), Louis Age Jr., his...
Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts

Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Equistar Chem v. Indeck Power: Clarifying Damage Recovery Limits and Condition Precedent Standards in Commercial Service Contracts Introduction Equistar Chemicals, L.P. (“Equistar”) contracted with...
Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727

Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727

Date: Apr 24, 2025
Reaffirmation of Twombly/Iqbal Pleading Standards in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings under 11 U.S.C. § 727 Introduction This case—Lucky Investments, Inc. v. Rahim—arose out of a Chapter 7 bankruptcy...
Upholding ALJ’s RFC Determinations Under the Substantial Evidence Standard: Hicks v. Commissioner, SSA

Upholding ALJ’s RFC Determinations Under the Substantial Evidence Standard: Hicks v. Commissioner, SSA

Date: Apr 23, 2025
Upholding ALJ’s RFC Determinations Under the Substantial Evidence Standard: Hicks v. Commissioner, SSA Introduction Hicks v. Commissioner, SSA, No. 24-10826 (5th Cir. Apr. 22, 2025), addresses the...
Equitable Substantial Compliance Doctrine Governs ERISA Beneficiary Designations and Standing in Interpleader Actions

Equitable Substantial Compliance Doctrine Governs ERISA Beneficiary Designations and Standing in Interpleader Actions

Date: Apr 22, 2025
Equitable Substantial Compliance Doctrine Governs ERISA Beneficiary Designations and Standing in Interpleader Actions Introduction Morgan v. Barrera, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert