Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ward v. Bechtel: Affirming Summary Judgment in Title VII and Tort Claims

Ward v. Bechtel: Affirming Summary Judgment in Title VII and Tort Claims

Date: Jan 3, 1997
Ward v. Bechtel: Affirming Summary Judgment in Title VII and Tort Claims Introduction Ward v. Bechtel Corporation, 102 F.3d 199 (5th Cir. 1997), involves Diana Ward, an African-American female...
Reaffirming Daubert Standards: Exclusion of EtO Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation

Reaffirming Daubert Standards: Exclusion of EtO Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation

Date: Jan 1, 1997
Reaffirming Daubert Standards: Exclusion of EtO Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation Introduction The case of Allen v. American Sterilizers Company (102 F.3d 194, 5th Cir. 1996) presents a...
Application of PLRA's In Forma Pauperis "Three Strikes" Rule: Adepegba v. Hammons

Application of PLRA's In Forma Pauperis "Three Strikes" Rule: Adepegba v. Hammons

Date: Jan 1, 1997
Application of PLRA's In Forma Pauperis "Three Strikes" Rule: Adepegba v. Hammons Introduction Valentino B. Adepegba, a Nigerian citizen and federal prisoner, initiated a civil rights action against...
Support for Local Zoning Authority in Regulating Manufactured Housing: Fifth Circuit Upholds Preemption and Commerce Clauses

Support for Local Zoning Authority in Regulating Manufactured Housing: Fifth Circuit Upholds Preemption and Commerce Clauses

Date: Dec 27, 1996
Support for Local Zoning Authority in Regulating Manufactured Housing: Fifth Circuit Upholds Preemption and Commerce Clauses Introduction The case of TEXAS MANUFACTURED HOUSING ASSOCIATION, INC.;...
Affirmation of Dismissals and Rejection of Strict Liability in Doddy v. Oxy et al.

Affirmation of Dismissals and Rejection of Strict Liability in Doddy v. Oxy et al.

Date: Dec 19, 1996
Affirmation of Dismissals and Rejection of Strict Liability in Doddy v. Oxy et al. Introduction In Robin Ray Doddy; Jeanette W. Doddy, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Oxy USA, Inc.; Occidental Petroleum...
Enhanced Procedures for Service of Process in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Enhanced Procedures for Service of Process in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board

Date: Dec 19, 1996
Enhanced Procedures for Service of Process in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board Introduction Bobby Lee Lindsey v. United States Railroad Retirement Board,...
Establishing the Pretext Standard in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Establishing the Pretext Standard in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation

Date: Dec 14, 1996
Establishing the Pretext Standard in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Analysis of Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Introduction The case of Willie Bea Grimes v. Texas...
Reaffirming Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Insights from Ikerd v. Blair et al.

Reaffirming Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Insights from Ikerd v. Blair et al.

Date: Dec 13, 1996
Reaffirming Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Insights from Ikerd v. Blair et al. Introduction Ikerd v. Blair et al. (101 F.3d 430, 5th Cir. 1996) serves as a pivotal case in the...
Revised In Forma Pauperis Procedures Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Jackson v. Stinnett et al.

Revised In Forma Pauperis Procedures Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Jackson v. Stinnett et al.

Date: Dec 12, 1996
Revised In Forma Pauperis Procedures Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Jackson v. Stinnett et al. Introduction Case: IRA JACKSON, JR, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN STINNETT; KENT RAMSEY;...
Issue Preclusion of State Court Sanctioning Judgments in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: Gober v. Terra+ Corp.

Issue Preclusion of State Court Sanctioning Judgments in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: Gober v. Terra+ Corp.

Date: Dec 11, 1996
Issue Preclusion of State Court Sanctioning Judgments in Bankruptcy Discharge Proceedings: Gober v. Terra+ Corp. Introduction Gober v. Terra+ Corporation is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Individual Impact of Rule 11 Violations on Guilty Pleas: Insights from Still v. USA

Individual Impact of Rule 11 Violations on Guilty Pleas: Insights from Still v. USA

Date: Dec 11, 1996
Individual Impact of Rule 11 Violations on Guilty Pleas: Insights from Still v. USA Introduction In United States of America v. Byron Still, 102 F.3d 118 (5th Cir. 1996), the United States Court of...
EEOC v. Texas Instruments: Affirming Summary Judgment and Clarifying the Role of Statistical and Procedural Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims

EEOC v. Texas Instruments: Affirming Summary Judgment and Clarifying the Role of Statistical and Procedural Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Dec 11, 1996
EEOC v. Texas Instruments: Affirming Summary Judgment and Clarifying the Role of Statistical and Procedural Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case Equal Employment...
Summary Judgment Standards in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Bookman v. Dallas Police Officers

Summary Judgment Standards in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Bookman v. Dallas Police Officers

Date: Nov 22, 1996
Summary Judgment Standards in In Forma Pauperis Cases: Bookman v. Dallas Police Officers Introduction In the landmark case of Angela Lashone Bookman v. Dallas Police Officers, the United States...
Affirmation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Standards and Jury Impartiality Protections in Sotelo et al. v. USA

Affirmation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Standards and Jury Impartiality Protections in Sotelo et al. v. USA

Date: Nov 21, 1996
Affirmation of Continuing Criminal Enterprise Standards and Jury Impartiality Protections in Sotelo et al. v. USA Introduction Sotelo et al. v. United States, 97 F.3d 782 (5th Cir. 1996), is a...
Application of Lodestar Method in Attorney Fee Awards Reversed: Riley v. American Family Radio

Application of Lodestar Method in Attorney Fee Awards Reversed: Riley v. American Family Radio

Date: Nov 20, 1996
Application of Lodestar Method in Attorney Fee Awards Reversed: Riley v. American Family Radio Introduction The case of Riley v. American Family Radio ([99 F.3d...
Enhancing Fee Awards in Desegregation Litigation: Insights from Walker et al. v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Enhancing Fee Awards in Desegregation Litigation: Insights from Walker et al. v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Date: Nov 20, 1996
Enhancing Fee Awards in Desegregation Litigation: Insights from Walker et al. v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Introduction The case of Debra Walker, et al. v. U.S. Department of...
Fraudulent Joinder and Diversity Jurisdiction: Analyzing Sid Richardson Carbon Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.

Fraudulent Joinder and Diversity Jurisdiction: Analyzing Sid Richardson Carbon Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd.

Date: Nov 16, 1996
Fraudulent Joinder and Diversity Jurisdiction: Analyzing Sid Richardson Carbon Gasoline Co. v. Interenergy Resources, Ltd. Introduction The case of Sid Richardson Carbon Gasoline Company ("Sid...
Contract Formation and Sanctions: Analysis of Scaife Flight Operations v. Associated Air Center Inc.

Contract Formation and Sanctions: Analysis of Scaife Flight Operations v. Associated Air Center Inc.

Date: Nov 15, 1996
Contract Formation and Sanctions: Analysis of Scaife Flight Operations v. Associated Air Center Inc. Introduction The case of Richard M. Scaife, doing business as Scaife Flight Operations;...
Binding Nature of Employment Discrimination Settlements: Insights from Jackson v. Air Force

Binding Nature of Employment Discrimination Settlements: Insights from Jackson v. Air Force

Date: Nov 15, 1996
Binding Nature of Employment Discrimination Settlements: Insights from Jackson v. Air Force Introduction Jackson v. Air Force, 99 F.3d 710 (5th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case in the realm of...
World Tanker Carriers Corp. v. MV Ya Mawlaya: Affirming Federal Personal Jurisdiction in Admiralty Cases under Rule 4(k)(2)

World Tanker Carriers Corp. v. MV Ya Mawlaya: Affirming Federal Personal Jurisdiction in Admiralty Cases under Rule 4(k)(2)

Date: Nov 15, 1996
World Tanker Carriers Corp. v. MV Ya Mawlaya: Affirming Federal Personal Jurisdiction in Admiralty Cases under Rule 4(k)(2) Introduction In World Tanker Carriers Corp. v. MV Ya Mawlaya, the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert