Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Insurer's Duty to Defend and Indemnify under Exclusion Clauses in CANUTILLO v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit Clarifies Insurer's Duty to Defend and Indemnify under Exclusion Clauses in CANUTILLO v. National Union Fire Insurance Company

Date: Nov 14, 1996
Fifth Circuit Clarifies Insurer's Duty to Defend and Indemnify under Exclusion Clauses in CANUTILLO v. National Union Fire Insurance Company Introduction The case of CANUTILLO Independent School...
Reversal of Firearm Convictions under BAILEY v. UNITED STATES: Comprehensive Analysis of Payne et al. v. United States

Reversal of Firearm Convictions under BAILEY v. UNITED STATES: Comprehensive Analysis of Payne et al. v. United States

Date: Nov 12, 1996
Reversal of Firearm Convictions under BAILEY v. UNITED STATES: Comprehensive Analysis of Payne et al. v. United States Introduction The case United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth...
HECK v. HUMPHREY and Its Implications on Section 1983 Claims Post-Conviction: Analysis of Hudson v. Hughes et al.

HECK v. HUMPHREY and Its Implications on Section 1983 Claims Post-Conviction: Analysis of Hudson v. Hughes et al.

Date: Nov 6, 1996
HECK v. HUMPHREY and Its Implications on Section 1983 Claims Post-Conviction: Analysis of Hudson v. Hughes et al. Introduction The case of Keith Hudson v. Yvonne L. Hughes, Attorney; City of New...
Procedural Bar Doctrine in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Martin v. Maxey

Procedural Bar Doctrine in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Martin v. Maxey

Date: Nov 2, 1996
Procedural Bar Doctrine in Habeas Corpus: Insights from Martin v. Maxey Introduction In the landmark case Milton Martin v. Ruble Maxey, 98 F.3d 844 (5th Cir. 1996), the United States Court of Appeals...
Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedents on Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations in ADA Litigation: Riel v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedents on Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations in ADA Litigation: Riel v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

Date: Nov 2, 1996
Fifth Circuit Establishes New Precedents on Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations in ADA Litigation: Riel v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation Introduction In the landmark case...
Affirmation of Treasury Regulation Disallowing Section 404(k) Dividends Deduction in AMT Calculations: Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner

Affirmation of Treasury Regulation Disallowing Section 404(k) Dividends Deduction in AMT Calculations: Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner

Date: Oct 29, 1996
Affirmation of Treasury Regulation Disallowing Section 404(k) Dividends Deduction in AMT Calculations: Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner Introduction The case Snap-Drape, Inc. v. Commissioner of...
Pretextual Justifications in Employment Discrimination: Williams v. Time Warner Operations

Pretextual Justifications in Employment Discrimination: Williams v. Time Warner Operations

Date: Oct 26, 1996
Pretextual Justifications in Employment Discrimination: Williams v. Time Warner Operations Introduction Alfred Williams, a Black male employee of Time Warner Operation, Inc., filed a lawsuit alleging...
Clarifying ERISA Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees: Bellaire General Hospital v. Blue Cross

Clarifying ERISA Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees: Bellaire General Hospital v. Blue Cross

Date: Oct 24, 1996
Clarifying ERISA Jurisdiction and Attorneys' Fees: Bellaire General Hospital v. Blue Cross Introduction Bellaire General Hospital (Plaintiff-Appellee) versus Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan...
Farpella-Crosby v. Horizon Health Care: Clarifying Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Mental Anguish Damages under Title VII

Farpella-Crosby v. Horizon Health Care: Clarifying Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Mental Anguish Damages under Title VII

Date: Oct 22, 1996
Farpella-Crosby v. Horizon Health Care: Clarifying Standards for Hostile Work Environment and Mental Anguish Damages under Title VII Introduction In the landmark case of Farpella-Crosby v. Horizon...
Apportionment of Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Class Actions: Shiver v. J.C. Penney Co.

Apportionment of Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Class Actions: Shiver v. J.C. Penney Co.

Date: Oct 18, 1996
Apportionment of Attorneys' Fees in ERISA Class Actions: Shiver v. J.C. Penney Co. Introduction The case of Mary Jane Forbush, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Similarly Situated,...
Absolute Judicial Immunity Extends to Sheriffs Executing Valid Judicial Orders: Analysis of Mays v. Sudderth, et al.

Absolute Judicial Immunity Extends to Sheriffs Executing Valid Judicial Orders: Analysis of Mays v. Sudderth, et al.

Date: Oct 16, 1996
Absolute Judicial Immunity Extends to Sheriffs Executing Valid Judicial Orders: Analysis of Mays v. Sudderth, et al. Introduction MELISSA V. MAYS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BEN D. SUDDERTH; THOMAS PACK;...
Separation of Federal and State Claims: Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries Jurisdictional Clarifications

Separation of Federal and State Claims: Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries Jurisdictional Clarifications

Date: Oct 16, 1996
Separation of Federal and State Claims: Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries Jurisdictional Clarifications Introduction Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries, L.P. is a pivotal case decided by the United States...
State Compliance and Due Process in Inmate Trust Account Debits: Myers v. Klevenhagen

State Compliance and Due Process in Inmate Trust Account Debits: Myers v. Klevenhagen

Date: Oct 12, 1996
State Compliance and Due Process in Inmate Trust Account Debits: Myers v. Klevenhagen Introduction The case of Myers v. Klevenhagen and Delverne v. Klevenhagen presents a significant examination of...
Interpretation of Eighth Amendment in Mitigating Factors: Drinkard v. Johnson

Interpretation of Eighth Amendment in Mitigating Factors: Drinkard v. Johnson

Date: Oct 8, 1996
Interpretation of Eighth Amendment in Mitigating Factors: Drinkard v. Johnson Introduction Drinkard v. Johnson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in 1996,...
Deere Industries Inc. v. Guillory: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Limits in Products Liability

Deere Industries Inc. v. Guillory: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Limits in Products Liability

Date: Sep 28, 1996
Deere Industries Inc. v. Guillory: Affirmation of Workers' Compensation Limits in Products Liability Introduction The case Anthony Guillory, Mary Guillory v. Domtar Industries Incorporated et al. was...
Affirmation of Time-Barred Maintenance and Cure Claim under the Suits in Admiralty Act

Affirmation of Time-Barred Maintenance and Cure Claim under the Suits in Admiralty Act

Date: Sep 27, 1996
Affirmation of Time-Barred Maintenance and Cure Claim under the Suits in Admiralty Act Introduction The case of Youssery F. Rashidi v. American President Lines, United States of America, and COMET...
Enhanced Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1) in the Branch Davidian Case

Enhanced Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1) in the Branch Davidian Case

Date: Sep 26, 1996
Enhanced Sentencing Under 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1) in the Branch Davidian Case Introduction The case of United States of America v. Branch et al. adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Overcoming Procedural Bar through Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Section 2255 Relief: United States v. Guerra

Overcoming Procedural Bar through Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Section 2255 Relief: United States v. Guerra

Date: Sep 26, 1996
Overcoming Procedural Bar through Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Section 2255 Relief: United States v. Guerra Introduction United States v. Robert Rolando Guerra is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hirras v. Amtrak: Employer's Prompt Remedial Actions Under Title VII

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hirras v. Amtrak: Employer's Prompt Remedial Actions Under Title VII

Date: Sep 26, 1996
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hirras v. Amtrak: Employer's Prompt Remedial Actions Under Title VII Introduction In Hirras v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 95 F.3d 396 (5th Cir. 1996),...
Enforcement of Discovery Orders and Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Summary Judgment: Barrett v. Atlantic Richfield

Enforcement of Discovery Orders and Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Summary Judgment: Barrett v. Atlantic Richfield

Date: Sep 20, 1996
Enforcement of Discovery Orders and Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Summary Judgment: Barrett v. Atlantic Richfield Introduction The case of Rosa Ann Barrett, et al. v. Atlantic Richfield...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert