Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Impact of AEDPA on Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ojo v. INS

Impact of AEDPA on Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ojo v. INS

Date: Mar 5, 1997
Impact of AEDPA on Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ojo v. INS Introduction The case of Anthony Ojo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Prosecutorial Immunity and Limitation of Local Government Liability in Section 1983 Actions: Esteves v. Brock and Harris County

Prosecutorial Immunity and Limitation of Local Government Liability in Section 1983 Actions: Esteves v. Brock and Harris County

Date: Mar 1, 1997
Prosecutorial Immunity and Limitation of Local Government Liability in Section 1983 Actions: Esteves v. Brock and Harris County Introduction Esteves v. Brock and Harris County is a pivotal case...
Clarifying Administrative Fee Procedures under 11 U.S.C. §503: DP Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Hall Financial Group, Inc.

Clarifying Administrative Fee Procedures under 11 U.S.C. §503: DP Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Hall Financial Group, Inc.

Date: Mar 1, 1997
Clarifying Administrative Fee Procedures under 11 U.S.C. §503: DP Partners Ltd. Partnership v. Hall Financial Group, Inc. Introduction The case of DP Partners Ltd. Partnership, Debtor, v. Hall...
Standard of Care for Seamen Under the Jones Act: Moving from Slight Care to Ordinary Prudence

Standard of Care for Seamen Under the Jones Act: Moving from Slight Care to Ordinary Prudence

Date: Mar 1, 1997
Standard of Care for Seamen Under the Jones Act: Moving from Slight Care to Ordinary Prudence Introduction Charles D. GAUTREAUX v. SCURLOCK MARINE, INC., 107 F.3d 331 (5th Cir. 1997), represents a...
Affirmation of Pre-AEDPA Standards and Strickland Principles in Federal Habeas Review – Livingston v. Johnson (5th Cir.)

Affirmation of Pre-AEDPA Standards and Strickland Principles in Federal Habeas Review – Livingston v. Johnson (5th Cir.)

Date: Feb 28, 1997
Affirmation of Pre-AEDPA Standards and Strickland Principles in Federal Habeas Review Introduction Charlie Livingston v. Gary Johnson is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Sharp v. Johnson

Reaffirmation of Procedural Default Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Sharp v. Johnson

Date: Feb 27, 1997
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default Standards in Habeas Corpus Relief: Sharp v. Johnson Introduction Michael Eugene Sharp, a Texas death row inmate, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging his...
Involuntary Medical Treatment in Prisons: McCormick v. Stalder Establishes Precedent

Involuntary Medical Treatment in Prisons: McCormick v. Stalder Establishes Precedent

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Involuntary Medical Treatment in Prisons: McCormick v. Stalder Establishes Precedent Introduction McCormick v. Stalder is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal: Rodriguez v. Johnson Establishes Rigor in Successive Petitions

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal: Rodriguez v. Johnson Establishes Rigor in Successive Petitions

Date: Feb 20, 1997
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Dismissal: Rodriguez v. Johnson Establishes Rigor in Successive Petitions Introduction In Rodriguez v. Johnson (104 F.3d 694, 5th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of...
San Elizario Independent School District v. Rosa H.: Establishing Limits on Title IX Liability for Sexual Harassment

San Elizario Independent School District v. Rosa H.: Establishing Limits on Title IX Liability for Sexual Harassment

Date: Feb 18, 1997
San Elizario Independent School District v. Rosa H.: Establishing Limits on Title IX Liability for Sexual Harassment Introduction In Rosa H. v. San Elizario Independent School District, 106 F.3d 648...
Establishing 'Qualified Individual' and Safety Considerations Under the ADA: Analysis of Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.

Establishing 'Qualified Individual' and Safety Considerations Under the ADA: Analysis of Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.

Date: Feb 14, 1997
Establishing 'Qualified Individual' and Safety Considerations Under the ADA: Analysis of Turco v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc. Introduction The case of John R. Turco v. Hoechst Celanese...
Plan Administrator Liability Post-Bankruptcy under ERISA: Insights from Willie Hall v. National Gypsum Co.

Plan Administrator Liability Post-Bankruptcy under ERISA: Insights from Willie Hall v. National Gypsum Co.

Date: Feb 7, 1997
Plan Administrator Liability Post-Bankruptcy under ERISA: Insights from Willie Hall v. National Gypsum Co. Introduction The case of Willie Hall v. National Gypsum Co. (105 F.3d 225) presents a...
Madison v. Parker: Establishing Due Process Protections for Good Time Credits in Texas Prisons

Madison v. Parker: Establishing Due Process Protections for Good Time Credits in Texas Prisons

Date: Feb 1, 1997
Madison v. Parker: Establishing Due Process Protections for Good Time Credits in Texas Prisons Introduction Madison v. Parker, 104 F.3d 765 (5th Cir. 1997), is a landmark case that addresses the...
Establishing Single Employer Status under the ADEA: An In-depth Analysis of Schweitzer v. Advanced Telemarketing Corporation

Establishing Single Employer Status under the ADEA: An In-depth Analysis of Schweitzer v. Advanced Telemarketing Corporation

Date: Feb 1, 1997
Establishing Single Employer Status under the ADEA: An In-depth Analysis of Schweitzer v. Advanced Telemarketing Corporation Introduction The legal landscape of employment discrimination is complex,...
Deceptive Debt Collection: Misrepresentation of Attorney Involvement under FDCPA

Deceptive Debt Collection: Misrepresentation of Attorney Involvement under FDCPA

Date: Jan 30, 1997
Deceptive Debt Collection: Misrepresentation of Attorney Involvement under FDCPA Introduction The case of Charles Ray Taylor v. Perrin, Landry, deLaunay Durand, Allan L. Durand, and USI Financial...
Wyshak Associates Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation in Securities Fraud

Wyshak Associates Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation in Securities Fraud

Date: Jan 24, 1997
Wyshak Associates Liability for Negligent Misrepresentation in Securities Fraud Introduction The case of Trust Company of Louisiana v. Wyshak Associates establishes significant legal precedents in...
Enforcement of Texas Insurance Code Article 21.55 Penalties in Higginbotham v. State Farm

Enforcement of Texas Insurance Code Article 21.55 Penalties in Higginbotham v. State Farm

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Enforcement of Texas Insurance Code Article 21.55 Penalties in Higginbotham v. State Farm Introduction The case of John Higginbotham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 103 F.3d 456...
Defining 'Ultimate Employment Decisions' in Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Mattern v. Eastman Kodak

Defining 'Ultimate Employment Decisions' in Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Mattern v. Eastman Kodak

Date: Jan 17, 1997
Defining 'Ultimate Employment Decisions' in Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Introduction The case of Jean G. Mattern v. Eastman Kodak Company and Eastman Chemical Company...
Constructive Denial of Counsel in Sentencing Enhancement: Childress v. Johnson

Constructive Denial of Counsel in Sentencing Enhancement: Childress v. Johnson

Date: Jan 11, 1997
Constructive Denial of Counsel in Sentencing Enhancement: Childress v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case Joe David Childress v. Gary L. Johnson, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Lockhart v. Johnson: Reaffirming AEDPA Standards for Habeas Corpus Appeals

Lockhart v. Johnson: Reaffirming AEDPA Standards for Habeas Corpus Appeals

Date: Jan 10, 1997
Lockhart v. Johnson: Reaffirming AEDPA Standards for Habeas Corpus Appeals Introduction Lockhart v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 54 (5th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal appellate case in which Michael Lee Lockhart, a...
Expanding Interpretation of Aiding and Abetting and Business Records Exception under the Confrontation Clause in United States v. Ismoila

Expanding Interpretation of Aiding and Abetting and Business Records Exception under the Confrontation Clause in United States v. Ismoila

Date: Jan 3, 1997
Expanding Interpretation of Aiding and Abetting and Business Records Exception under the Confrontation Clause in United States v. Ismoila Introduction United States of America v. Moyosore Ismoila;...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert