Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Standards for Naked Licensing and Trademark Dilution Affirmed in Exxon v. Oxxford Clothes

Strict Standards for Naked Licensing and Trademark Dilution Affirmed in Exxon v. Oxxford Clothes

Date: May 15, 1997
Strict Standards for Naked Licensing and Trademark Dilution Affirmed in Exxon v. Oxxford Clothes Introduction The appellate case Exxon Corporation v. Oxxford Clothes, Inc. and Oxxford Clothes XX,...
Modifying Chapter 13 Plans to Include Postpetition Mortgage Arrearages: Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corporation

Modifying Chapter 13 Plans to Include Postpetition Mortgage Arrearages: Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corporation

Date: May 13, 1997
Modifying Chapter 13 Plans to Include Postpetition Mortgage Arrearages: Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corporation Introduction Mendoza v. Temple-Inland Mortgage Corporation (111 F.3d 1264) is a...
Enforceability of Foreign Forum-Selection Clauses in Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Mitsui Co. (USA) v. Euro-Baltic Lines

Enforceability of Foreign Forum-Selection Clauses in Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Mitsui Co. (USA) v. Euro-Baltic Lines

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Enforceability of Foreign Forum-Selection Clauses in Bills of Lading Under COGSA: Mitsui Co. (USA) v. Euro-Baltic Lines Introduction The case of Mitsui Co. (USA), Inc. v. Euro-Baltic Lines, Inc.,...
Improper Removal and Fee Awards under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Insights from AVITTS v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.

Improper Removal and Fee Awards under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Insights from AVITTS v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.

Date: Apr 29, 1997
Improper Removal and Fee Awards under 28 U.S.C. §1447(c): Insights from AVITTS v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO. Introduction AVITTS v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO., 111 F.3d 30 (5th Cir. 1997), presents a pivotal...
Insufficiency of Evidence in Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Swanson v. GSA (110 F.3d 1180)

Insufficiency of Evidence in Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Swanson v. GSA (110 F.3d 1180)

Date: Apr 25, 1997
Insufficiency of Evidence in Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Analysis of Swanson v. GSA (110 F.3d 1180) Introduction The case of Tommy L. Swanson v. General Services Administration...
Equal Protection and Due Process in Prisoner Parole: Insights from Johnson v. Rodriguez (110 F.3d 299)

Equal Protection and Due Process in Prisoner Parole: Insights from Johnson v. Rodriguez (110 F.3d 299)

Date: Apr 24, 1997
Equal Protection and Due Process in Prisoner Parole: Insights from Johnson v. Rodriguez (110 F.3d 299) Introduction In the landmark case Johnson v. Rodriguez, decided on April 23, 1997, the United...
Affirmation of Franchise Agreements' Terms and Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Clark v. AFC

Affirmation of Franchise Agreements' Terms and Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Clark v. AFC

Date: Apr 23, 1997
Affirmation of Franchise Agreements' Terms and Implied Covenant of Good Faith in Clark v. America's Favorite Chicken Company Introduction The case of Clark v. America's Favorite Chicken Company...
Affirmation of Courts' Inherent Powers to Sanction Attorneys for Egregious Deposition Conduct: Carroll v. Jaques

Affirmation of Courts' Inherent Powers to Sanction Attorneys for Egregious Deposition Conduct: Carroll v. Jaques

Date: Apr 19, 1997
Affirmation of Courts' Inherent Powers to Sanction Attorneys for Egregious Deposition Conduct: Carroll v. Jaques Introduction In Carroll v. Jaques, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Ensuring Voluntary Pleas: Insights from United States v. Orlando Amaya

Ensuring Voluntary Pleas: Insights from United States v. Orlando Amaya

Date: Apr 17, 1997
Ensuring Voluntary Pleas: Insights from United States v. Orlando Amaya Introduction United States of America v. Orlando Amaya, 111 F.3d 386 (5th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Affirmation of New Trial Due to Insufficient Evidence in Conspiracy Cases

Affirmation of New Trial Due to Insufficient Evidence in Conspiracy Cases

Date: Apr 11, 1997
Affirmation of New Trial Due to Insufficient Evidence in Conspiracy Cases Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Gregory A. Robertson, 110 F.3d 1113 (5th Cir. 1997), the United...
Establishing State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims for School Employee Misconduct: Analysis of Becerra v. Asher

Establishing State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims for School Employee Misconduct: Analysis of Becerra v. Asher

Date: Apr 8, 1997
Establishing State Action Requirements in §1983 Claims for School Employee Misconduct: Analysis of Becerra v. Asher Introduction The case of Rosa Becerra v. Jerry Asher, et al. presents a significant...
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in Subrogation and Independent Contractor Liability: Reliance Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.

Affirmation of Summary Judgments in Subrogation and Independent Contractor Liability: Reliance Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.

Date: Apr 5, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in Subrogation and Independent Contractor Liability: Reliance Insurance Co. v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. Introduction The case of Reliance Insurance Company v....
AEDPA’s Certificate of Appealability Not Retroactive in Section 2255 Appeals: Insights from United States v. Rocha

AEDPA’s Certificate of Appealability Not Retroactive in Section 2255 Appeals: Insights from United States v. Rocha

Date: Apr 4, 1997
AEDPA’s Certificate of Appealability Not Retroactive in Section 2255 Appeals: Insights from United States v. Rocha Introduction United States v. Ruben Rocha (109 F.3d 225) is a significant case...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Nieto v. Surlean Meat Company

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Nieto v. Surlean Meat Company

Date: Mar 29, 1997
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in National Origin Discrimination Case: Nieto v. Surlean Meat Company Introduction The case of Amador Nieto v. L H Packing Co.; Surlean Meat Company addressed...
U.S. v. Asibor: Upholding Conspiracy Convictions and Clarifying Defenses in Illegal Re-entry Cases

U.S. v. Asibor: Upholding Conspiracy Convictions and Clarifying Defenses in Illegal Re-entry Cases

Date: Mar 28, 1997
U.S. v. Asibor: Upholding Conspiracy Convictions and Clarifying Defenses in Illegal Re-entry Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Stanley Harrison Asibor and Ganiu Ladejobi (109...
Establishing Bankruptcy Courts’ Authority in Civil Contempt Proceedings: In re Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc.

Establishing Bankruptcy Courts’ Authority in Civil Contempt Proceedings: In re Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc.

Date: Mar 28, 1997
Establishing Bankruptcy Courts’ Authority in Civil Contempt Proceedings: In re Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc. Introduction The case of Placid Refining Company v. Terrebonne Fuel and Lube, Inc. (108...
Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment in Continuing Criminal Enterprise under U.S.S.G. Section 2D1.5

Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment in Continuing Criminal Enterprise under U.S.S.G. Section 2D1.5

Date: Mar 15, 1997
Affirmation of Mandatory Life Imprisonment in Continuing Criminal Enterprise under U.S.S.G. Section 2D1.5 Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Hilario Gonzalez-Balderas, Sr., the...
Affirming Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Hernandez v. Johnson

Affirming Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Hernandez v. Johnson

Date: Mar 13, 1997
Affirming Standards for Conflict of Interest and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Hernandez v. Johnson Introduction The case of Rogelio Rangel Hernandez v. Gary Johnson addressed critical issues...
Affirming the Exclusivity of the Louisiana Products Liability Act: Dismissal of Market Share and Civil Conspiracy Claims in Jefferson v. Lead Industries Association

Affirming the Exclusivity of the Louisiana Products Liability Act: Dismissal of Market Share and Civil Conspiracy Claims in Jefferson v. Lead Industries Association

Date: Mar 13, 1997
Affirming the Exclusivity of the Louisiana Products Liability Act: Dismissal of Market Share and Civil Conspiracy Claims in Jefferson v. Lead Industries Association Introduction In Jefferson v. Lead...
Martinez v. Johnson: Affirming Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) Dismissal in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Martinez v. Johnson: Affirming Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) Dismissal in Habeas Corpus Proceedings

Date: Mar 7, 1997
Martinez v. Johnson: Affirming Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) Dismissal in Habeas Corpus Proceedings Introduction Martinez v. Johnson, 104 F.3d 769 (5th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case addressing the intersection...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert