Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

5th Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitation on AEDPA’s Retroactive Application to Pending Habeas Petitions: Green v. Johnson

Limitation on AEDPA’s Retroactive Application to Pending Habeas Petitions: Green v. Johnson

Date: Jun 28, 1997
Limitation on AEDPA’s Retroactive Application to Pending Habeas Petitions: Green v. Johnson Introduction Green v. Johnson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Lackey v. Johnson: Limiting Appellate Review Under AEDPA to Specified Issues

Lackey v. Johnson: Limiting Appellate Review Under AEDPA to Specified Issues

Date: Jun 27, 1997
Lackey v. Johnson: Limiting Appellate Review Under AEDPA to Specified Issues Introduction The case of Mitchell Lackey v. Gary L. Johnson, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Affirmation of ADA Compliance: Permitting Service Animals in Public Accommodations

Affirmation of ADA Compliance: Permitting Service Animals in Public Accommodations

Date: Jun 26, 1997
Affirmation of ADA Compliance: Permitting Service Animals in Public Accommodations Introduction In the landmark case Franklin JOHNSON v. GAMBRINUS COMPANY/SPOETZL BREWERY, Franklin Johnson, a blind...
Hileman v. City of Dallas: Defining "Individual with a Disability" under the Rehabilitation Act

Hileman v. City of Dallas: Defining "Individual with a Disability" under the Rehabilitation Act

Date: Jun 25, 1997
Hileman v. City of Dallas: Defining "Individual with a Disability" under the Rehabilitation Act Introduction The case of Marilie Hileman v. City of Dallas, Texas, reported in 115 F.3d 352 (1997),...
Applicability of PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision to Section 1983 Suits: Carson v. Johnson

Applicability of PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision to Section 1983 Suits: Carson v. Johnson

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Applicability of PLRA's "Three Strikes" Provision to Section 1983 Suits: Carson v. Johnson Introduction Arthur X. Carson, a Texas state prisoner, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983...
Affirmed Authority of IRS to Levy Annuity Payments and Burden of Proof in Melton v. TIAA

Affirmed Authority of IRS to Levy Annuity Payments and Burden of Proof in Melton v. TIAA

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Affirmed Authority of IRS to Levy Annuity Payments and Burden of Proof in Melton v. TIAA Introduction In the landmark case of Rosser B. Melton, Jr. v. Teachers Insurance Annuity Association of...
Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Officials in Harassment Cases: Insights from Southard v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice

Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Officials in Harassment Cases: Insights from Southard v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice

Date: Jun 14, 1997
Qualified Immunity for Supervisory Officials in Harassment Cases: Insights from Southard v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice Introduction In the landmark case of Southard v. Texas Board of Criminal...
Applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's In Forma Pauperis Provisions to Nonprisoners: Analysis of Haynes v. Scott

Applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's In Forma Pauperis Provisions to Nonprisoners: Analysis of Haynes v. Scott

Date: Jun 13, 1997
Applicability of the Prison Litigation Reform Act's In Forma Pauperis Provisions to Nonprisoners: Analysis of Haynes v. Scott Introduction In the landmark case of Harry Dean Haynes v. Wayne Scott,...
Certifying Appealability under AEDPA: The Hill v. Johnson Decision

Certifying Appealability under AEDPA: The Hill v. Johnson Decision

Date: Jun 6, 1997
Certifying Appealability under AEDPA: The Hill v. Johnson Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Larry Hill v. Gary L. Johnson, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth...
Remanding INS v. Mikhael: Refining Standards for Well-Founded Fear of Persecution

Remanding INS v. Mikhael: Refining Standards for Well-Founded Fear of Persecution

Date: Jun 5, 1997
Remanding INS v. Mikhael: Refining Standards for Well-Founded Fear of Persecution Introduction Hekmat Wadih Mikhael v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 115 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 1997), serves as...
Establishing Fraudulent Intent in RICO Claims: CROWE v. HENRY

Establishing Fraudulent Intent in RICO Claims: CROWE v. HENRY

Date: Jun 5, 1997
Establishing Fraudulent Intent in RICO Claims: CROWE v. HENRY Introduction CROWE v. HENRY, 115 F.3d 294 (5th Cir. 1997), is a pivotal case in the realm of RICO (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt...
Fuller v. Johnson: AEDPA's Role in Habeas Corpus Challenges to Death Sentences

Fuller v. Johnson: AEDPA's Role in Habeas Corpus Challenges to Death Sentences

Date: May 31, 1997
Fuller v. Johnson: AEDPA's Role in Habeas Corpus Challenges to Death Sentences Introduction The case of Aaron Lee Fuller v. Gary Johnson, Director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice,...
Affirming Limited §1983 Liability for School Officials: No Special Relationship to Invoke Constitutional Protection

Affirming Limited §1983 Liability for School Officials: No Special Relationship to Invoke Constitutional Protection

Date: May 28, 1997
Affirming Limited §1983 Liability for School Officials: No Special Relationship to Invoke Constitutional Protection Introduction The case of John Doe, as Next Friend of Jane Doe, a Child,...
Dunn-McCampbell v. National Park Service: Statute of Limitations in Regulatory Challenges

Dunn-McCampbell v. National Park Service: Statute of Limitations in Regulatory Challenges

Date: May 24, 1997
Dunn-McCampbell v. National Park Service: Statute of Limitations in Regulatory Challenges Introduction The case Dunn-McCampbell Royalty Interest, Inc. v. National Park Service (112 F.3d 1283, 5th...
Enhanced Particularity Requirements Under Rule 9(b) in Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Williams v. WMX Technologies

Enhanced Particularity Requirements Under Rule 9(b) in Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Williams v. WMX Technologies

Date: May 23, 1997
Enhanced Particularity Requirements Under Rule 9(b) in Securities Fraud Litigation: Insights from Williams v. WMX Technologies Introduction The case of Dennis Williams and Richard Dreiling v. WMX...
Prescriptive Period for Asbestos Claims Established: Orléans Parish School Board v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd.

Prescriptive Period for Asbestos Claims Established: Orléans Parish School Board v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd.

Date: May 23, 1997
Prescriptive Period for Asbestos Claims Established: Orléans Parish School Board v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. Introduction The case Orléans Parish School Board v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (No. 95-30670, 114...
Creations Unlimited v. McCain: Establishing Standards for Copyright Infringement and
    Jurisdiction Over Attorney's Fees in the Fifth Circuit

Creations Unlimited v. McCain: Establishing Standards for Copyright Infringement and Jurisdiction Over Attorney's Fees in the Fifth Circuit

Date: May 22, 1997
Creations Unlimited v. McCain: Establishing Standards for Copyright Infringement and Jurisdiction Over Attorney's Fees in the Fifth Circuit Introduction In Creations Unlimited, Inc. and Tina Sartin...
SCOTT v. MOORE: Establishing Standards for Jail Staffing and Detainee Safety

SCOTT v. MOORE: Establishing Standards for Jail Staffing and Detainee Safety

Date: May 21, 1997
SCOTT v. MOORE: Establishing Standards for Jail Staffing and Detainee Safety Introduction In Artelia M. Scott v. George E. Moore, 114 F.3d 51 (5th Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination: Coleman v. Houston Independent School District

Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination: Coleman v. Houston Independent School District

Date: May 20, 1997
Qualified Immunity in Employment Discrimination: Coleman v. Houston Independent School District Introduction Coleman v. Houston Independent School District is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Fifth Circuit Affirms Federal Common Law Jurisdiction in Transnational Environmental Claims and Clarifies Corporate Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction

Fifth Circuit Affirms Federal Common Law Jurisdiction in Transnational Environmental Claims and Clarifies Corporate Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: May 20, 1997
Fifth Circuit Affirms Federal Common Law Jurisdiction in Transnational Environmental Claims and Clarifies Corporate Citizenship for Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction In the landmark case of Gerardo...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert