Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

FLSA Exemption Standards Clarified in Conley v. City of Newport News

FLSA Exemption Standards Clarified in Conley v. City of Newport News

Date: Jun 23, 1993
FLSA Exemption Standards Clarified in Conley v. City of Newport News Introduction In the landmark case Conley v. City of Newport News, thirty-two current or former officers of the Newport News Police...
EMTALA Claims Unbound by State Arbitration: Insights from Robert Brooks v. Maryland General Hospital

EMTALA Claims Unbound by State Arbitration: Insights from Robert Brooks v. Maryland General Hospital

Date: Jun 22, 1993
EMTALA Claims Unbound by State Arbitration: Insights from Robert Brooks v. Maryland General Hospital Introduction The case of Robert Brooks v. Maryland General Hospital, Inc. addresses a pivotal...
Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Lalor

Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Lalor

Date: Jun 12, 1993
Establishing Nexus in Search Warrants: Insights from United States v. Lalor Introduction United States of America v. John Lalor, 996 F.2d 1578 (4th Cir. 1993), is a pivotal case that delves into the...
Trade Secret Protection Under MUTSA Affirmed: State Law Claims Not Preempted by Copyright Act

Trade Secret Protection Under MUTSA Affirmed: State Law Claims Not Preempted by Copyright Act

Date: Jun 11, 1993
Trade Secret Protection Under MUTSA Affirmed: State Law Claims Not Preempted by Copyright Act Introduction In the landmark case of Trandes Corporation v. Guy F. Atkinson Company and Washington...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Upholding Grand Jury Indictments in United States v. Mills

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Upholding Grand Jury Indictments in United States v. Mills

Date: May 29, 1993
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction and Upholding Grand Jury Indictments in United States v. Mills Introduction The case of United States of America v. Brian Keith Mills (1993) presents significant...
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pruett v. Thompson

Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pruett v. Thompson

Date: May 26, 1993
Reaffirmation of Procedural Default and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pruett v. Thompson Introduction David M. Pruett v. Charles Thompson, 996 F.2d 1560...
Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Attorneys' Fees Award in Groundless §1983 Election Fraud Litigation

Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Attorneys' Fees Award in Groundless §1983 Election Fraud Litigation

Date: May 25, 1993
Fourth Circuit Reaffirms Attorneys' Fees Award in Groundless §1983 Election Fraud Litigation Introduction The case of John Hutchinson, William Reese, Leonard Underwood, Plaintiffs-Appellees v....
Establishing the Necessity of Adhering to Industry Standards in Products Liability: Alevromagiros v. Hechinger and White Metal

Establishing the Necessity of Adhering to Industry Standards in Products Liability: Alevromagiros v. Hechinger and White Metal

Date: May 22, 1993
Establishing the Necessity of Adhering to Industry Standards in Products Liability: Alevromagiros v. Hechinger and White Metal Introduction In the landmark case of Theodore Alevromagiros,...
Affirming Due Process Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Holland Pty Ltd.

Affirming Due Process Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Holland Pty Ltd.

Date: May 21, 1993
Affirming Due Process Limits on Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Defendants: Ellicott Machine Corp. v. Holland Pty Ltd. Introduction The case of Ellicott Machine Corporation, Incorporated v. John...
Chapin v. Knight-Ridder: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Libel Cases Involving Public Figures and the Press

Chapin v. Knight-Ridder: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Libel Cases Involving Public Figures and the Press

Date: May 20, 1993
Chapin v. Knight-Ridder: Upholding First Amendment Protections in Libel Cases Involving Public Figures and the Press Introduction In Chapin v. Knight-Ridder, Incorporated et al. (993 F.2d 1087, 4th...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Excessive Force Claims: Kopf v. Skyrm et al.

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Excessive Force Claims: Kopf v. Skyrm et al.

Date: May 8, 1993
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Excessive Force Claims: Kopf v. Skyrm et al. Introduction Kopf v. Skyrm et al. is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth...
Fourth Circuit Upholds Constitutional Detention Policies in Hause v. Vaught

Fourth Circuit Upholds Constitutional Detention Policies in Hause v. Vaught

Date: May 8, 1993
Fourth Circuit Upholds Constitutional Detention Policies in Hause v. Vaught Introduction Hause v. Vaught, 993 F.2d 1079 (4th Cir. 1993), is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Contractual Remedies and Liability in Satellite Launch Agreements: Insights from Martin Marietta Corp. v. INTELSAT

Contractual Remedies and Liability in Satellite Launch Agreements: Insights from Martin Marietta Corp. v. INTELSAT

Date: May 6, 1993
Contractual Remedies and Liability in Satellite Launch Agreements: Insights from Martin Marietta Corp. v. INTELSAT Introduction The case of Martin Marietta Corporation v. International...
Affirmation of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction in Searle Company Products Liability Case

Affirmation of Lack of Personal Jurisdiction in Searle Company Products Liability Case

Date: Apr 24, 1993
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice regarding your specific situation, please consult a qualified attorney....
Substantial Justification of Government Position Under EAJA: Analysis of ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASS'N v. HUDSON

Substantial Justification of Government Position Under EAJA: Analysis of ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASS'N v. HUDSON

Date: Apr 21, 1993
Substantial Justification of Government Position Under EAJA: Analysis of ROANOKE RIVER BASIN ASS'N v. HUDSON Introduction The case of Roanoke River Basin Association v. Hudson (991 F.2d 132)...
Failure to File Client-Requested Appeal Constitutes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: United States v. Peak

Failure to File Client-Requested Appeal Constitutes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: United States v. Peak

Date: Apr 17, 1993
Failure to File Client-Requested Appeal Constitutes Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: United States v. Peak Introduction United States v. Homer McKinley Peak, 992 F.2d 39 (4th Cir. 1993), is a...
Enforcing ERISA's Duty to Provide Specific Denial Reasons: Weaver v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company

Enforcing ERISA's Duty to Provide Specific Denial Reasons: Weaver v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company

Date: Apr 2, 1993
Enforcing ERISA's Duty to Provide Specific Denial Reasons: Weaver v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company Introduction In Weaver v. Phoenix Home Life Mutual Insurance Company, the United States...
Adequate Notice Standards for Secured Creditors in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: The Linkous v. Piedmont Trust Bank Decision

Adequate Notice Standards for Secured Creditors in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: The Linkous v. Piedmont Trust Bank Decision

Date: Apr 2, 1993
Adequate Notice Standards for Secured Creditors in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy: The Linkous v. Piedmont Trust Bank Decision Introduction The case of In re Alvie Stanley Linkous, Debtor v. Piedmont Trust...
Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements

Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements

Date: Mar 30, 1993
Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. United Medical...
Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims

Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims

Date: Mar 27, 1993
Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims Introduction Strickler v. Waters (989 F.2d 1375, 4th Cir. 1993) presents...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert