Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Bell: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines and Statutory Elements of 18 U.S.C. §2251(a)

United States v. Bell: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines and Statutory Elements of 18 U.S.C. §2251(a)

Date: Sep 14, 1993
United States v. Bell: Clarifying Sentencing Guidelines and Statutory Elements of 18 U.S.C. §2251(a) Introduction The case of United States of America v. George Robert Bell (5 F.3d 64) adjudicated by...
Wittek Industries v. Biggers et al.: Reinforcing ERISA’s Preemption in Employee Benefit Plans

Wittek Industries v. Biggers et al.: Reinforcing ERISA’s Preemption in Employee Benefit Plans

Date: Aug 28, 1993
Wittek Industries v. Biggers et al.: Reinforcing ERISA’s Preemption in Employee Benefit Plans Introduction In Wittek Industries, Inc. v. Biggers et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Impact of Predictive Statements on Securities Fraud Liability: Raab & Isaacs v. General Physics Corp.

Impact of Predictive Statements on Securities Fraud Liability: Raab & Isaacs v. General Physics Corp.

Date: Aug 27, 1993
Impact of Predictive Statements on Securities Fraud Liability: Raab & Isaacs v. General Physics Corp. Introduction The case of Adolph P. Raab; Lenora Isaacs, Plaintiffs-Appellants versus General...
Marex Titanic, Inc. v. Wrecked Vessel: Reaffirming the Unassailable Nature of Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals

Marex Titanic, Inc. v. Wrecked Vessel: Reaffirming the Unassailable Nature of Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals

Date: Aug 25, 1993
Marex Titanic, Inc. v. Wrecked Vessel: Reaffirming the Unassailable Nature of Rule 41(a)(1)(i) Dismissals Introduction The case of Marex Titanic, Inc. v. Wrecked and Abandoned Vessel, RMS Titanic, in...
Threshold for Eighth Amendment Violations in Prison Meal Provisions: White v. Gregory & House

Threshold for Eighth Amendment Violations in Prison Meal Provisions: White v. Gregory & House

Date: Aug 24, 1993
Threshold for Eighth Amendment Violations in Prison Meal Provisions: White v. Gregory & House Introduction In the case of Jess White v. Ronald O. Gregory; Michael House, decided by the United States...
Appropriate Use of Rule 54(b) in Environmental Liability Cases: Insights from Braswell Shipyards v. Beazer East

Appropriate Use of Rule 54(b) in Environmental Liability Cases: Insights from Braswell Shipyards v. Beazer East

Date: Aug 24, 1993
Appropriate Use of Rule 54(b) in Environmental Liability Cases: Insights from Braswell Shipyards v. Beazer East Introduction Braswell Shipyards, Inc. v. Beazer East, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Receivership as Bankruptcy Under Grantor Trust Agreements: Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Receivership as Bankruptcy Under Grantor Trust Agreements: Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corporation

Date: Aug 21, 1993
Receivership as Bankruptcy Under Grantor Trust Agreements: Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corporation Introduction The case of Goodman v. Resolution Trust Corporation addressed pivotal issues...
Enhanced Scrutiny of Fiduciary Discretion in ERISA Plan Amendments: Doe v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Enhanced Scrutiny of Fiduciary Discretion in ERISA Plan Amendments: Doe v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Date: Aug 19, 1993
Enhanced Scrutiny of Fiduciary Discretion in ERISA Plan Amendments: Doe v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Introduction The case of John Doe; Firm Doe v. Group Hospitalization Medical Services d/b/a Blue...
Establishing Equitable Relief under Rule 60(b)(6): A Comprehensive Commentary on National Credit Union Administration Board v. Gray

Establishing Equitable Relief under Rule 60(b)(6): A Comprehensive Commentary on National Credit Union Administration Board v. Gray

Date: Aug 14, 1993
Establishing Equitable Relief under Rule 60(b)(6): A Comprehensive Commentary on National Credit Union Administration Board v. Gray Introduction The case of National Credit Union Administration Board...
Firing of FBI Special Agent Due to Misconduct: Implications of Rehabilitation Act Protections

Firing of FBI Special Agent Due to Misconduct: Implications of Rehabilitation Act Protections

Date: Aug 11, 1993
Firing of FBI Special Agent Due to Misconduct: Implications of Rehabilitation Act Protections Introduction The case of Charles E. Little, Jr. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation serves as a pivotal...
Mylan Laboratories v. Akzo: Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parent Corporations

Mylan Laboratories v. Akzo: Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parent Corporations

Date: Aug 7, 1993
Mylan Laboratories v. Akzo: Clarifying Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Parent Corporations Introduction In Mylan Laboratories, Incorporated v. Akzo, N.V., 2 F.3d 56 (4th Cir. 1993), the United...
Affirmation of FTCA Statute of Limitations in Muth v. United States: A Comprehensive Commentary

Affirmation of FTCA Statute of Limitations in Muth v. United States: A Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Aug 7, 1993
Affirmation of FTCA Statute of Limitations in Muth v. United States: A Comprehensive Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of D.P. Muth; J.P. Muth v. United States of America, adjudicated by...
Prosecutorial Overreach and Fair Trial Protections: United States v. Mitchell

Prosecutorial Overreach and Fair Trial Protections: United States v. Mitchell

Date: Aug 4, 1993
Prosecutorial Overreach and Fair Trial Protections: United States v. Mitchell Introduction The case of United States of America v. Paul Michael Mitchell, 1 F.3d 235 (4th Cir. 1993), serves as a...
Complete Preemption under §301(a) of the Copyright Act and the New Standard for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under §505: Insights from Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates

Complete Preemption under §301(a) of the Copyright Act and the New Standard for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under §505: Insights from Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates

Date: Jul 30, 1993
Complete Preemption under §301(a) of the Copyright Act and the New Standard for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under §505: Insights from Rosciszewski v. Arete Associates Introduction The case of Jan J....
Interpreting Statute of Limitations for Rehabilitation Act Claims: Wolsky v. Medical College of Hampton Roads

Interpreting Statute of Limitations for Rehabilitation Act Claims: Wolsky v. Medical College of Hampton Roads

Date: Jul 29, 1993
Interpreting Statute of Limitations for Rehabilitation Act Claims: Wolsky v. Medical College of Hampton Roads Introduction The case of Christopher Wolsky v. Medical College of Hampton Roads addresses...
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Insights from American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland v. Wicomico County

Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Insights from American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland v. Wicomico County

Date: Jul 24, 1993
Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Insights from American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland v. Wicomico County Introduction The case of American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, Inc. v. Wicomico...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Drewitt v. Pratt Establishes Clear Guidelines for Officer Conduct

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Drewitt v. Pratt Establishes Clear Guidelines for Officer Conduct

Date: Jul 23, 1993
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Drewitt v. Pratt Establishes Clear Guidelines for Officer Conduct Introduction The case of Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt; Pizza Hut of America, Inc. (999 F.2d 774)...
Federal Courts Reinforce Railroad Protection Against Discriminatory Taxation: Richmond, Fredericksburg Potomac Railroad Co. v. Forst

Federal Courts Reinforce Railroad Protection Against Discriminatory Taxation: Richmond, Fredericksburg Potomac Railroad Co. v. Forst

Date: Jul 16, 1993
Federal Courts Reinforce Railroad Protection Against Discriminatory Taxation: Richmond, Fredericksburg Potomac Railroad Co. v. Forst Introduction The case of Richmond, Fredericksburg Potomac Railroad...
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Applicability and Limitations of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act in Orsi v. Sbarbaro

Fourth Circuit Clarifies Applicability and Limitations of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act in Orsi v. Sbarbaro

Date: Jul 15, 1993
Fourth Circuit Clarifies Applicability and Limitations of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act in Orsi v. Sbarbaro Introduction The case of Orsi et al. v. Sbarbaro et al. (999 F.2d 86, 4th...
Private Entity Status Affirmed for Federal Home Loan Bank in Andrews v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta

Private Entity Status Affirmed for Federal Home Loan Bank in Andrews v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta

Date: Jun 29, 1993
Private Entity Status Affirmed for Federal Home Loan Bank in Andrews v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta Introduction The case of Harrel G. Andrews v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (998 F.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert