Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

4th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements

Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements

Date: Mar 30, 1993
Fourth Circuit Affirms Securities Fraud Conspiracy Convictions: Key Insights on Statute of Limitations and Plea Agreements Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. United Medical...
Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims

Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims

Date: Mar 27, 1993
Strickler v. Waters: Affirming the Necessity of Demonstrating Serious Deprivation in Eighth Amendment Prison Conditions Claims Introduction Strickler v. Waters (989 F.2d 1375, 4th Cir. 1993) presents...
Custis v. United States: Upholding Standards for New Trials and Limiting Challenges to Predicate Convictions

Custis v. United States: Upholding Standards for New Trials and Limiting Challenges to Predicate Convictions

Date: Mar 23, 1993
Custis v. United States: Upholding Standards for New Trials and Limiting Challenges to Predicate Convictions Introduction In United States of America v. Darren J. Custis, decided by the United States...
Interpreting Plea Agreements: Insights from United States v. Burns (990 F.2d 1426)

Interpreting Plea Agreements: Insights from United States v. Burns (990 F.2d 1426)

Date: Mar 20, 1993
Interpreting Plea Agreements: Insights from United States v. Burns (990 F.2d 1426) Introduction United States of America v. Donald Berry Burns is a significant appellate case decided by the United...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claims: Cook v. CSX Transportation

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claims: Cook v. CSX Transportation

Date: Mar 20, 1993
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Claims: Cook v. CSX Transportation Introduction The case of Curtiss L. Cook v. CSX Transportation Corporation (988 F.2d 507) was adjudicated...
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of Estrada v. Witkowski

Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of Estrada v. Witkowski

Date: Mar 11, 1993
Procedural Default and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: An Analysis of Estrada v. Witkowski Introduction Orlando Estrada v. Stanley Witkowski is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Baum v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Baum v. United States

Date: Feb 24, 1993
Discretionary Function Exception Reinforced in Baum v. United States Introduction Price A. Baum and Margaret Leedy filed a lawsuit against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims...
Carmack Amendment Preemption and Jurisdiction: Insights from Shao v. Link Cargo

Carmack Amendment Preemption and Jurisdiction: Insights from Shao v. Link Cargo

Date: Feb 23, 1993
Carmack Amendment Preemption and Jurisdiction: Insights from Shao v. Link Cargo Introduction In the seminal case of Shao v. Link Cargo (Taiwan) Limited et al., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Fourth Circuit Establishes Discretionary Scope for Evidence in ERISA De Novo Reviews and Refines Standards for Attorneys' Fees and Post-Judgment Interest in Quesinberry v. Life Insurance Co.

Fourth Circuit Establishes Discretionary Scope for Evidence in ERISA De Novo Reviews and Refines Standards for Attorneys' Fees and Post-Judgment Interest in Quesinberry v. Life Insurance Co.

Date: Feb 13, 1993
Fourth Circuit Establishes Discretionary Scope for Evidence in ERISA De Novo Reviews and Refines Standards for Attorneys' Fees and Post-Judgment Interest in Quesinberry v. Life Insurance Co....
Efficient Counsel and Plea Withdrawal Standards Established in Craig v. United States

Efficient Counsel and Plea Withdrawal Standards Established in Craig v. United States

Date: Feb 9, 1993
Efficient Counsel and Plea Withdrawal Standards Established in Craig v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Marc Steven Craig, 985 F.2d 175 (4th Cir. 1993), revolves...
Commerce Clause Precedence: Fourth Circuit Rules West Virginia's Certification Requirement Unconstitutional for Interstate Medical Waste Transporters

Commerce Clause Precedence: Fourth Circuit Rules West Virginia's Certification Requirement Unconstitutional for Interstate Medical Waste Transporters

Date: Feb 6, 1993
Commerce Clause Precedence: Fourth Circuit Rules West Virginia's Certification Requirement Unconstitutional for Interstate Medical Waste Transporters Introduction The case of Medigen of Kentucky,...
Affirmative Act Requirement in Inverse Condemnation: White v. County of Newberry

Affirmative Act Requirement in Inverse Condemnation: White v. County of Newberry

Date: Feb 6, 1993
Affirmative Act Requirement in Inverse Condemnation: White v. County of Newberry Introduction In White v. County of Newberry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit addressed...
Incorporation of Adult-Tried Juvenile Convictions as Predicate Offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act: United States v. Lender

Incorporation of Adult-Tried Juvenile Convictions as Predicate Offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act: United States v. Lender

Date: Feb 2, 1993
Incorporation of Adult-Tried Juvenile Convictions as Predicate Offenses under the Armed Career Criminal Act: United States v. Lender Introduction United States of America v. Calvin Edwin Lender, 985...
Federal Hazardous Substances Act Preempts State Failure to Warn Claims When Federal Labeling Requirements are Met

Federal Hazardous Substances Act Preempts State Failure to Warn Claims When Federal Labeling Requirements are Met

Date: Jan 29, 1993
Federal Hazardous Substances Act Preempts State Failure to Warn Claims When Federal Labeling Requirements are Met Introduction The case of MELVIN MOSS v. PARKS CORPORATION (985 F.2d 736, 4th Cir....
Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Drug-Related Investigations: United States v. Sinclair

Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Drug-Related Investigations: United States v. Sinclair

Date: Jan 13, 1993
Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Drug-Related Investigations: United States v. Sinclair Introduction The case of United States of America v. Raymond Franzwa Sinclair pertains to a...
Affirming Judicial Authority to Impose Pre-Filing Review Systems on Litigious Inmates: In re John Rogers Burnley

Affirming Judicial Authority to Impose Pre-Filing Review Systems on Litigious Inmates: In re John Rogers Burnley

Date: Dec 23, 1992
Affirming Judicial Authority to Impose Pre-Filing Review Systems on Litigious Inmates: In re John Rogers Burnley Introduction The case of In re John Rogers Burnley addresses the complex balance...
Clarifying Civil Conspiracy and Jury Verdict Procedures under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Hafner v. Brown et al.

Clarifying Civil Conspiracy and Jury Verdict Procedures under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Hafner v. Brown et al.

Date: Dec 23, 1992
Clarifying Civil Conspiracy and Jury Verdict Procedures under 42 U.S.C. §1983: Insights from Hafner v. Brown et al. Introduction The case of Mark R. Hafner v. David Brown, Gary Reininger, Jonathan...
Affirmation of SSI Denial Based on Substantial Evidence: Hunter v. Sullivan (1992)

Affirmation of SSI Denial Based on Substantial Evidence: Hunter v. Sullivan (1992)

Date: Dec 19, 1992
Affirmation of SSI Denial Based on Substantial Evidence: Hunter v. Sullivan (1992) Introduction Hunter v. Sullivan is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors, Judges, and Court Clerks in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clay v. Yates

Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors, Judges, and Court Clerks in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clay v. Yates

Date: Dec 16, 1992
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Prosecutors, Judges, and Court Clerks in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims: A Comprehensive Analysis of Clay v. Yates Introduction In the landmark case of Albert Russell...
M M Medical Supplies and Service, Inc. v. Pleasant Valley Hospital, Inc.: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Monopolization Claims

M M Medical Supplies and Service, Inc. v. Pleasant Valley Hospital, Inc.: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Monopolization Claims

Date: Dec 10, 1992
M M Medical Supplies and Service, Inc. v. Pleasant Valley Hospital, Inc.: Establishing Standards for Antitrust Monopolization Claims Introduction In the landmark case M M Medical Supplies and...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert