Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

ADA Applicability to Correctional Facilities Established in Yeskey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

ADA Applicability to Correctional Facilities Established in Yeskey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Date: Jul 11, 1997
ADA Applicability to Correctional Facilities Established in Yeskey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Introduction The case of Ronald R. Yeskey v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections...
Third Circuit Affirms Actual Injury Requirement in §1983 Prisoners' Access to Courts Claims Following LEWIS v. CASEY

Third Circuit Affirms Actual Injury Requirement in §1983 Prisoners' Access to Courts Claims Following LEWIS v. CASEY

Date: Jul 11, 1997
Third Circuit Affirms Actual Injury Requirement in §1983 Prisoners' Access to Courts Claims Following LEWIS v. CASEY Introduction In the case of Lorenzo Oliver v. William Fauver et al., decided by...
Establishing Joint and Several Liability for Negligent Securities Fraud: SEC v. Hughes Capital Corporation

Establishing Joint and Several Liability for Negligent Securities Fraud: SEC v. Hughes Capital Corporation

Date: Jul 10, 1997
Establishing Joint and Several Liability for Negligent Securities Fraud: SEC v. Hughes Capital Corporation Introduction The case of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. Hughes Capital...
Dischargeability of Federal Tax Liabilities Under Section 523(a)(1)(C): Insights from In re Fegeley

Dischargeability of Federal Tax Liabilities Under Section 523(a)(1)(C): Insights from In re Fegeley

Date: Jul 9, 1997
Dischargeability of Federal Tax Liabilities Under Section 523(a)(1)(C): Insights from In re Fegeley Introduction The case In re: Henry Fegeley; Annmarie Fegeley, Debtors United States of America v....
Discovery Rule Applied to Lanham Act Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania Law

Discovery Rule Applied to Lanham Act Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania Law

Date: Jul 4, 1997
Discovery Rule Applied to Lanham Act Fraud Claims under Pennsylvania Law Introduction The case Beauty Time, Inc.; Beauty Makers, Inc.; R. Richard Riso, Appellants, v. VU Skin Systems, Inc.; BJV; DPM...
Hamilton v. Levy: Strengthening the Deliberate Indifference Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Prison Safety Claims

Hamilton v. Levy: Strengthening the Deliberate Indifference Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Prison Safety Claims

Date: Jul 1, 1997
Hamilton v. Levy: Strengthening the Deliberate Indifference Doctrine in Eighth Amendment Prison Safety Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Jerome K. Hamilton v. Faith Levy, Pamela Faulkner,...
Graves v. Lowery: County Government Recognized as Co-Employer under Title VII

Graves v. Lowery: County Government Recognized as Co-Employer under Title VII

Date: Jun 24, 1997
Graves v. Lowery: County Government Recognized as Co-Employer under Title VII Introduction In the landmark case Graves v. Lowery, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed a...
Establishing Fiduciary Duty Claims Under ERISA: Insights from Jordan v. Federal Express Corporation

Establishing Fiduciary Duty Claims Under ERISA: Insights from Jordan v. Federal Express Corporation

Date: Jun 20, 1997
Establishing Fiduciary Duty Claims Under ERISA: Insights from Jordan v. Federal Express Corporation Introduction Jordan v. Federal Express Corporation, 116 F.3d 1005 (3d Cir. 1997), is a seminal case...
Reevaluation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Baldino v. Wilson

Reevaluation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Baldino v. Wilson

Date: Jun 17, 1997
Reevaluation of Automatic Stay in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from Baldino v. Wilson Introduction The case of Lisa Baldino v. Robert Frank-Leonard Wilson serves as a pivotal example in...
Affirmation of State Court’s Interpretation in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Johnson v. Rosemeyer

Affirmation of State Court’s Interpretation in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Johnson v. Rosemeyer

Date: Jun 14, 1997
Affirmation of State Court’s Interpretation in Federal Habeas Corpus Review: Johnson v. Rosemeyer Introduction In Curtis Johnson v. Frederick Rosemeyer, a 1997 decision by the United States Court of...
Clarifying Employer and Employee Duties in Reasonable Accommodation: Mengine v. Runyon

Clarifying Employer and Employee Duties in Reasonable Accommodation: Mengine v. Runyon

Date: Jun 12, 1997
Clarifying Employer and Employee Duties in Reasonable Accommodation: Mengine v. Runyon Introduction The case of Michael A. Mengine v. Marvin Runyon, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service (114 F.3d...
Klinger and Neyer v. State Farm: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Insurer Good Faith Practices

Klinger and Neyer v. State Farm: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Insurer Good Faith Practices

Date: Jun 11, 1997
Klinger and Neyer v. State Farm: Establishing Enhanced Standards for Insurer Good Faith Practices Introduction The case Klinger and Neyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company,...
Reinforcing the Particularity Standard in Securities Fraud: Insights from In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation

Reinforcing the Particularity Standard in Securities Fraud: Insights from In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation

Date: Jun 11, 1997
Reinforcing the Particularity Standard in Securities Fraud: Insights from In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation Introduction The case of In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities...
Cushman v. Trans Union: Reinforcing FCRA Reinvestigation Obligations

Cushman v. Trans Union: Reinforcing FCRA Reinvestigation Obligations

Date: Jun 10, 1997
Cushman v. Trans Union: Reinforcing FCRA Reinvestigation Obligations Introduction Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union Corporation is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Third Circuit Reinstates Imminent Danger Exception in Section 1983 Suits Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Gibbs v. Roman

Third Circuit Reinstates Imminent Danger Exception in Section 1983 Suits Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Gibbs v. Roman

Date: Jun 7, 1997
Third Circuit Reinstates Imminent Danger Exception in Section 1983 Suits Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Gibbs v. Roman Introduction In the landmark case of Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Ms. Marcia...
Collateral Order Doctrine Affirmed in Christy v. Horn: A Landmark in Habeas Corpus Jurisprudence

Collateral Order Doctrine Affirmed in Christy v. Horn: A Landmark in Habeas Corpus Jurisprudence

Date: Jun 6, 1997
Collateral Order Doctrine Affirmed in Christy v. Horn: A Landmark in Habeas Corpus Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Lawrence Duane Christy v. Martin F. Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania...
Revisiting Colorado River Abstention: The Third Circuit's Decision in Ryan v. Johnson

Revisiting Colorado River Abstention: The Third Circuit's Decision in Ryan v. Johnson

Date: May 31, 1997
Revisiting Colorado River Abstention: The Third Circuit's Decision in Ryan v. Johnson Introduction In the landmark case Ryan v. Johnson, 115 F.3d 193 (3d Cir. 1997), the United States Court of...
Boury Corp. Affirms Adequate Remedial Action in Hostile Work Environment Case

Boury Corp. Affirms Adequate Remedial Action in Hostile Work Environment Case

Date: May 30, 1997
Boury Corp. Affirms Adequate Remedial Action in Hostile Work Environment Case Introduction The case of Karla J. Knabe v. The Boury Corp. d/b/a Big Boy East d/b/a Elby's Big Boy (114 F.3d 407) before...
Third Circuit Clarifies Scope of Discretionary Function Exception in Federal Tort Claims Act

Third Circuit Clarifies Scope of Discretionary Function Exception in Federal Tort Claims Act

Date: May 29, 1997
Third Circuit Clarifies Scope of Discretionary Function Exception in Federal Tort Claims Act Introduction In Sheila Gotha v. United States of America, 115 F.3d 176 (3d Cir. 1997), the United States...
Affirmation of New Jersey's Wrongful Death and Survival Action Acts Excluding Stillborn Fetuses under the Fourteenth Amendment

Affirmation of New Jersey's Wrongful Death and Survival Action Acts Excluding Stillborn Fetuses under the Fourteenth Amendment

Date: May 24, 1997
Affirmation of New Jersey's Wrongful Death and Survival Action Acts Excluding Stillborn Fetuses under the Fourteenth Amendment Introduction In the case of KAREN ALEXANDER; DENNIS DRAZIN, ESQ.; DRAZIN...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert