Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Wake of Affidavit Misrepresentation: Sherwood v. Mulvihill

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Wake of Affidavit Misrepresentation: Sherwood v. Mulvihill

Date: May 16, 1997
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Wake of Affidavit Misrepresentation: Sherwood v. Mulvihill Introduction The case of George Sherwood v. James F. Mulvihill et al. adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1) Post-AEDPA

Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1) Post-AEDPA

Date: May 15, 1997
Affirmation of District Courts' Authority to Issue Certificates of Appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(1) Post-AEDPA Introduction UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT G. EYER, 113 F.3d 470 (3d Cir....
Continuing Violation Theory and Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination: Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.

Continuing Violation Theory and Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination: Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc.

Date: May 15, 1997
Continuing Violation Theory and Limitation Periods in Employment Discrimination: Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. (113 F.3d 476) Introduction Rush v. Scott Specialty Gases, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Arbitrary and Capricious Review Standard Applied to Discretionary ERISA Plan Administrator Decisions: Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak

Arbitrary and Capricious Review Standard Applied to Discretionary ERISA Plan Administrator Decisions: Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak

Date: May 9, 1997
Arbitrary and Capricious Review Standard Applied to Discretionary ERISA Plan Administrator Decisions: Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Introduction Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Company, 113 F.3d 433 (3d Cir....
Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Limitation on State Law Claims under the Delaware Workmen's Compensation Act

Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Limitation on State Law Claims under the Delaware Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: May 7, 1997
Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Limitation on State Law Claims under the Delaware Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction In the case of Sherlyn Konstantopoulos and Dimos Konstantopoulos v....
Administrative Custody and Procedural Due Process: Griffin v. Defendants

Administrative Custody and Procedural Due Process: Griffin v. Defendants

Date: May 6, 1997
Administrative Custody and Procedural Due Process: Griffin v. Defendants Introduction The case of Jerome Griffin v. Don Vaughan et al. addresses critical questions regarding the constitutional rights...
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Antitrust Claims for Utility Curtailment Policies under PURPA

Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Antitrust Claims for Utility Curtailment Policies under PURPA

Date: May 6, 1997
Third Circuit Establishes Limits on Antitrust Claims for Utility Curtailment Policies under PURPA Introduction The case of Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power Light Company (113...
Third Circuit Clarifies Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Scenarios: Harold Love v. Morton

Third Circuit Clarifies Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Scenarios: Harold Love v. Morton

Date: May 6, 1997
Third Circuit Clarifies Double Jeopardy Protections in Mistrial Scenarios: Harold Love v. Morton Introduction In the landmark case of Harold Love v. Willis Morton, Administrator-NJSP; Peter Verniero,...
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Prolonged Temporary Restraining Orders: Insights from Nutrasweet Co. v. Vit-Mar Enterprises

Appellate Jurisdiction Over Prolonged Temporary Restraining Orders: Insights from Nutrasweet Co. v. Vit-Mar Enterprises

Date: May 6, 1997
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Prolonged Temporary Restraining Orders: Insights from Nutrasweet Co. v. Vit-Mar Enterprises Introduction Nutrasweet Company v. Vit-Mar Enterprises, Inc., 112 F.3d 689 (3d...
Expansion of Protected Classes under 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Affirming Protections for the Mentally Retarded

Expansion of Protected Classes under 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Affirming Protections for the Mentally Retarded

Date: May 3, 1997
Expansion of Protected Classes under 42 U.S.C. §1985(3): Affirming Protections for the Mentally Retarded Introduction In the landmark case of Lake v. Arnold et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Statute of Frauds Defense: Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

Statute of Frauds Defense: Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation

Date: Apr 30, 1997
Statute of Frauds Defense: Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation Introduction The case of Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation (112 F.3d 124) was...
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Establishing Pretext in Title VII Employment Discrimination

Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Establishing Pretext in Title VII Employment Discrimination

Date: Apr 12, 1997
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Establishing Pretext in Title VII Employment Discrimination Introduction In the landmark case of Beryl Bray v. Marriott Hotels, the United States Court of...
Protection of Public Concern Speech in Retaliatory Discharge: A Comprehensive Analysis of Azzaro v. Allegheny County

Protection of Public Concern Speech in Retaliatory Discharge: A Comprehensive Analysis of Azzaro v. Allegheny County

Date: Apr 12, 1997
Protection of Public Concern Speech in Retaliatory Discharge: A Comprehensive Analysis of Azzaro v. Allegheny County Introduction Azzaro v. Allegheny County is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Ford Motor Co. v. Kelly: Establishing Collateral Order Jurisdiction for Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Discovery Disputes

Ford Motor Co. v. Kelly: Establishing Collateral Order Jurisdiction for Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Discovery Disputes

Date: Apr 10, 1997
Ford Motor Co. v. Kelly: Establishing Collateral Order Jurisdiction for Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine in Discovery Disputes Introduction In In re: Ford Motor Company, Petitioner...
Third Circuit Upholds Police Authority in Traffic Stops: Moorefield v. United States

Third Circuit Upholds Police Authority in Traffic Stops: Moorefield v. United States

Date: Apr 5, 1997
Third Circuit Upholds Police Authority in Traffic Stops: Moorefield v. United States Introduction UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GARY MOOREFIELD AKA MAURICE GORDON (111 F.3d 10) is a significant...
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes: Great Western Mortgage Corp. v. Michele Peacock

Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes: Great Western Mortgage Corp. v. Michele Peacock

Date: Apr 4, 1997
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements in Employment Disputes: Great Western Mortgage Corp. v. Michele Peacock Introduction The case of Great Western Mortgage Corporation v. Michele Peacock (110 F.3d...
Determinative Effect Standard in Retaliation Claims and Strict Administrative Filing Requirements: Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., Third Circuit

Determinative Effect Standard in Retaliation Claims and Strict Administrative Filing Requirements: Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., Third Circuit

Date: Apr 4, 1997
Determinative Effect Standard in Retaliation Claims and Strict Administrative Filing Requirements: Woodson v. Scott Paper Co., Third Circuit Introduction In James W. Woodson v. Scott Paper Company,...
Rigorous Pre-Trial Investigation Duties for Defense Counsel: Analysis of United States v. Kourtney Kauffman

Rigorous Pre-Trial Investigation Duties for Defense Counsel: Analysis of United States v. Kourtney Kauffman

Date: Mar 29, 1997
Rigorous Pre-Trial Investigation Duties for Defense Counsel: Analysis of United States v. Kourtney Kauffman Introduction United States of America v. Kourtney Kauffman, 109 F.3d 186 (3d Cir. 1997),...
Enforceability of Release Clauses in RICO Actions: Insights from Williams v. Stone

Enforceability of Release Clauses in RICO Actions: Insights from Williams v. Stone

Date: Mar 27, 1997
Enforceability of Release Clauses in RICO Actions: Insights from Williams v. Stone Introduction In the case of MICHAEL WILLIAMS; MARILYN WILLIAMS v. ELLIOTT W. STONE et al., decided by the United...
Expanding Title VII Protections: Kachmar v. SunGard Data Systems

Expanding Title VII Protections: Kachmar v. SunGard Data Systems

Date: Mar 27, 1997
Expanding Title VII Protections: Kachmar v. SunGard Data Systems Introduction Lillian Kachmar, formerly the senior in-house counsel for SunGard Data Systems, Inc., filed a lawsuit following her...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert