Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc. (167 F.3d 146) Commentary 1. Introduction In the case of Carol Heller et al. v. Shaw Industries, Inc., the United...
Balancing Interests in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Lazy Oil Co. v. Witco Corporation Introduction The case of Lazy Oil Co. et al. v. Witco Corporation et al. (166 F.3d 581, 3d Cir. 1999)...
Finality of Criminal Convictions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Kapral v. United States Introduction The case of Michael Kapral, Appellant v. United States of America (166 F.3d 565) represents a pivotal...
Expansion of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Over Post-Confirmation Trustee’s Fees Introduction The case of United States Trustee v. Gryphon at the Stone Mansion, Inc., decided by the United States...
Reynaldo Sandoval v. Reno: Affirming District Court Habeas Jurisdiction Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA Amendments Introduction The case of Reynaldo Sandoval v. Janet Reno navigates the complex interplay...
Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, the...
Expanding Federal Jurisdiction on Firearm Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders Introduction United States of America v. Cyrus R. Sanders, Jr., 165 F.3d 248 (3d Cir. 1999), is...
Timely Reconsideration Requests Tolling Statute of Limitations for Federal Employees under Title VII Introduction The case of Evelyn O. Holley v. Department of Veteran Affairs revolves around...
Affirmation of Conviction in Buehl v. Vaughn: Upholding Due Process and Counsel Effectiveness Standards Introduction In the landmark appellate case of Roger Peter Buehl v. Donald Vaughn et al., the...
Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Faragher and Ellerth: The Durham Life Insurance Co. v. Dianne Evans Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Durham Life...
Equitable Tolling in Title VII Cases: A New Precedent for Attorney Misconduct Introduction The case of Sharyn L. Seitzinger v. The Reading Hospital and Medical Center (165 F.3d 236) serves as a...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Baby Food Antitrust Litigation: Standards for Proving Price-Fixing Conspiracy Under Sherman Act Section 1 Introduction The case "IN RE: BABY FOOD ANTITRUST...
Separation of Core and Non-Core Proceedings in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Halper v. Halper Introduction The case of Irwin Halper v. Barry Halper, reported at 164 F.3d 830 by the United States Court of...
Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Air Lines: Affirming Defamation Claims and Limiting AODA Preemption in State Tort Actions Introduction In the landmark case Taj Mahal Travel, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.,...
Limitation of Standing under §43(a) of the Lanham Act for Retailers: Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc. Introduction Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. and Hi/Tor Automotive,...
Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction In the case of Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh, decided on December 29, 1998, the United States...
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA Introduction The case of Joseph A. Mondzelewski and Rebecca Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores, Inc. and Supermarkets General...
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal concerns or representation, please consult a qualified attorney. Qualified...
Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims Introduction In Mark Abbott v. Laurie J. Latshaw et al. (164 F.3d 141, 1998), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination Introduction The case of Karen C. Oldrati v. Kenneth S. Apfel addresses crucial...