Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Heller v. Shaw Industries Commentary

Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Heller v. Shaw Industries Commentary

Date: Feb 4, 1999
Reliability of Expert Testimony in Product Liability: Heller v. Shaw Industries, Inc. (167 F.3d 146) Commentary 1. Introduction In the case of Carol Heller et al. v. Shaw Industries, Inc., the United...
Balancing Interests in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Lazy Oil Co. v. Witco Corporation

Balancing Interests in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Lazy Oil Co. v. Witco Corporation

Date: Feb 3, 1999
Balancing Interests in Class Action Settlements: Insights from Lazy Oil Co. v. Witco Corporation Introduction The case of Lazy Oil Co. et al. v. Witco Corporation et al. (166 F.3d 581, 3d Cir. 1999)...
Finality of Criminal Convictions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Kapral v. United States

Finality of Criminal Convictions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Kapral v. United States

Date: Feb 3, 1999
Finality of Criminal Convictions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255: Kapral v. United States Introduction The case of Michael Kapral, Appellant v. United States of America (166 F.3d 565) represents a pivotal...
Expansion of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Over Post-Confirmation Trustee’s Fees

Expansion of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Over Post-Confirmation Trustee’s Fees

Date: Jan 29, 1999
Expansion of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction Over Post-Confirmation Trustee’s Fees Introduction The case of United States Trustee v. Gryphon at the Stone Mansion, Inc., decided by the United States...
Reynaldo Sandoval v. Reno: Affirming District Court Habeas Jurisdiction Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA Amendments

Reynaldo Sandoval v. Reno: Affirming District Court Habeas Jurisdiction Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA Amendments

Date: Jan 27, 1999
Reynaldo Sandoval v. Reno: Affirming District Court Habeas Jurisdiction Post-AEDPA and IIRIRA Amendments Introduction The case of Reynaldo Sandoval v. Janet Reno navigates the complex interplay...
Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.

Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 26, 1999
Limits on Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Cases: Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Meritcare Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company, the...
Expanding Federal Jurisdiction on Firearm Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders

Expanding Federal Jurisdiction on Firearm Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders

Date: Jan 22, 1999
Expanding Federal Jurisdiction on Firearm Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Cyrus R. Sanders Introduction United States of America v. Cyrus R. Sanders, Jr., 165 F.3d 248 (3d Cir. 1999), is...
Timely Reconsideration Requests Tolling Statute of Limitations for Federal Employees under Title VII

Timely Reconsideration Requests Tolling Statute of Limitations for Federal Employees under Title VII

Date: Jan 22, 1999
Timely Reconsideration Requests Tolling Statute of Limitations for Federal Employees under Title VII Introduction The case of Evelyn O. Holley v. Department of Veteran Affairs revolves around...
Buehl v. Vaughn: Affirmation of Conviction Amidst Ineffective Counsel Claims

Buehl v. Vaughn: Affirmation of Conviction Amidst Ineffective Counsel Claims

Date: Jan 21, 1999
Affirmation of Conviction in Buehl v. Vaughn: Upholding Due Process and Counsel Effectiveness Standards Introduction In the landmark appellate case of Roger Peter Buehl v. Donald Vaughn et al., the...
Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Faragher and Ellerth: The Durham Life Insurance Co. v. Dianne Evans Decision

Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Faragher and Ellerth: The Durham Life Insurance Co. v. Dianne Evans Decision

Date: Jan 16, 1999
Establishing Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Faragher and Ellerth: The Durham Life Insurance Co. v. Dianne Evans Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Durham Life...
Equitable Tolling in Title VII Cases: A New Precedent for Attorney Misconduct

Equitable Tolling in Title VII Cases: A New Precedent for Attorney Misconduct

Date: Jan 16, 1999
Equitable Tolling in Title VII Cases: A New Precedent for Attorney Misconduct Introduction The case of Sharyn L. Seitzinger v. The Reading Hospital and Medical Center (165 F.3d 236) serves as a...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Baby Food Antitrust Litigation: Standards for Proving Price-Fixing Conspiracy Under Sherman Act Section 1

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Baby Food Antitrust Litigation: Standards for Proving Price-Fixing Conspiracy Under Sherman Act Section 1

Date: Jan 13, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Baby Food Antitrust Litigation: Standards for Proving Price-Fixing Conspiracy Under Sherman Act Section 1 Introduction The case "IN RE: BABY FOOD ANTITRUST...
Separation of Core and Non-Core Proceedings in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Halper v. Halper

Separation of Core and Non-Core Proceedings in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Halper v. Halper

Date: Jan 7, 1999
Separation of Core and Non-Core Proceedings in Bankruptcy Jurisdiction: Halper v. Halper Introduction The case of Irwin Halper v. Barry Halper, reported at 164 F.3d 830 by the United States Court of...
Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Air Lines: Affirming Defamation Claims and Limiting AODA Preemption in State Tort Actions

Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Air Lines: Affirming Defamation Claims and Limiting AODA Preemption in State Tort Actions

Date: Dec 31, 1998
Taj Mahal Travel v. Delta Air Lines: Affirming Defamation Claims and Limiting AODA Preemption in State Tort Actions Introduction In the landmark case Taj Mahal Travel, Inc. v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.,...
Limitation of Standing under §43(a) of the Lanham Act for Retailers: Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc.

Limitation of Standing under §43(a) of the Lanham Act for Retailers: Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc.

Date: Dec 31, 1998
Limitation of Standing under §43(a) of the Lanham Act for Retailers: Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. v. Quaker State-Slick 50, Inc. Introduction Conte Bros. Automotive, Inc. and Hi/Tor Automotive,...
Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh

Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Dec 30, 1998
Strict Standards for Motions for Reconsideration Affirmed in Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction In the case of Wimbs v. City of Pittsburgh, decided on December 29, 1998, the United States...
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA

Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA

Date: Dec 24, 1998
Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores: Expanding Retaliation Claims Under the ADA Introduction The case of Joseph A. Mondzelewski and Rebecca Mondzelewski v. Pathmark Stores, Inc. and Supermarkets General...
Qualified Immunity in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Insights from Torres v. McLaughlin

Qualified Immunity in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Insights from Torres v. McLaughlin

Date: Dec 16, 1998
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal concerns or representation, please consult a qualified attorney. Qualified...
Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims

Date: Dec 12, 1998
Abbott v. Latshaw: Clarifying State Action and Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims Introduction In Mark Abbott v. Laurie J. Latshaw et al. (164 F.3d 141, 1998), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination

Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination

Date: Dec 8, 1998
Remand Affirmed Due to Insufficient Consideration of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Determination Introduction The case of Karen C. Oldrati v. Kenneth S. Apfel addresses crucial...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert