Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

No Antitrust Violation for Contractually Defined Relevant Markets: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Pizza Franchisee Suit

No Antitrust Violation for Contractually Defined Relevant Markets: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Pizza Franchisee Suit

Date: Aug 28, 1997
No Antitrust Violation for Contractually Defined Relevant Markets: Third Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Pizza Franchisee Suit Introduction In the case of Queen City Pizza, Inc. et al. v. Domino's...
Upheld Surveillance Practices in Illegal Gambling Investigations: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Salvatore A. Williams et al.

Upheld Surveillance Practices in Illegal Gambling Investigations: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Salvatore A. Williams et al.

Date: Aug 27, 1997
Upheld Surveillance Practices in Illegal Gambling Investigations: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Salvatore A. Williams et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v....
Reversing Attorney's Fees Award in EEOC v. L.B. Foster Co.: A New Standard for Fee Determination under Title VII

Reversing Attorney's Fees Award in EEOC v. L.B. Foster Co.: A New Standard for Fee Determination under Title VII

Date: Aug 26, 1997
Reversing Attorney's Fees Award in EEOC v. L.B. Foster Co.: A New Standard for Fee Determination under Title VII Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v. L.B. Foster...
Extension of Time for Service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m): Insights from Boley v. Kaymark

Extension of Time for Service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m): Insights from Boley v. Kaymark

Date: Aug 26, 1997
Extension of Time for Service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m): Insights from Boley v. Kaymark Introduction The case of Wayne E. Boley v. Dale Kaymark (123 F.3d 756) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Federal Bankruptcy Law Does Not Preempt New Jersey's Restriction on Assigning Pre-Judgment Tort Claims

Federal Bankruptcy Law Does Not Preempt New Jersey's Restriction on Assigning Pre-Judgment Tort Claims

Date: Aug 23, 1997
Federal Bankruptcy Law Does Not Preempt New Jersey's Restriction on Assigning Pre-Judgment Tort Claims Introduction The case of Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc....
Schonewolf v. Callahan: Reinforcing the Importance of Substantial Evidence in Disability Determinations

Schonewolf v. Callahan: Reinforcing the Importance of Substantial Evidence in Disability Determinations

Date: Aug 23, 1997
Schonewolf v. Callahan: Reinforcing the Importance of Substantial Evidence in Disability Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of Schonewolf v. Callahan, the United States District Court...
Establishing New Precedents in Ex Post Facto and Due Process Protections under Megan's Law: A Comprehensive Analysis

Establishing New Precedents in Ex Post Facto and Due Process Protections under Megan's Law: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Aug 21, 1997
Establishing New Precedents in Ex Post Facto and Due Process Protections under Megan's Law: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of E.B. v. Peter Verniero, Attorney General of the State of...
Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Insights from Stephens v. Kerrigan

Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Insights from Stephens v. Kerrigan

Date: Aug 13, 1997
Political Discrimination in Public Employment: Insights from Stephens v. Kerrigan Introduction The case of Stephens et al. v. Kerrigan et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Rogers v. Pennsylvania State Police: Clarification on Qualified Immunity and Unlawful Arrest

Rogers v. Pennsylvania State Police: Clarification on Qualified Immunity and Unlawful Arrest

Date: Aug 12, 1997
Rogers v. Pennsylvania State Police: Clarification on Qualified Immunity and Unlawful Arrest Introduction Rogers v. Pennsylvania State Police, 120 F.3d 446 (3d Cir. 1997), is a significant case that...
Revisiting the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: Insights from Reliance Insurance Co. v. Moessner

Revisiting the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: Insights from Reliance Insurance Co. v. Moessner

Date: Aug 6, 1997
Revisiting the Reasonable Expectations Doctrine: Insights from Reliance Insurance Company v. Mark Moessner and Marcia Moessner Introduction The case of Reliance Insurance Company v. Mark Moessner and...
Standing Requirements under the Clean Water Act: PIRG v. Magnesium Elektron

Standing Requirements under the Clean Water Act: PIRG v. Magnesium Elektron

Date: Aug 6, 1997
Standing Requirements under the Clean Water Act: PIRG v. Magnesium Elektron Introduction In the landmark case Public Interest Research Group of New Jersey, Inc.; Friends of the Earth New Jersey...
Third Circuit Upholds Extended Ballot Access Deadlines to Protect Alternative Political Parties’ Constitutional Rights

Third Circuit Upholds Extended Ballot Access Deadlines to Protect Alternative Political Parties’ Constitutional Rights

Date: Aug 5, 1997
Third Circuit Upholds Extended Ballot Access Deadlines to Protect Alternative Political Parties’ Constitutional Rights Introduction In the landmark case Council of Alternative Political Parties et...
Deliberate Indifference Standards Affirmed in Wilson v. Horn

Deliberate Indifference Standards Affirmed in Wilson v. Horn

Date: Aug 2, 1997
Deliberate Indifference Standards Affirmed in Wilson v. Horn Introduction Richard Wilson, a general population inmate at SCI-Frackville, Pennsylvania, filed a § 1983 action against individual prison...
Stewart v. Rutgers: Establishing the Importance of Grievance Evidence in Racial Discrimination Tenure Claims

Stewart v. Rutgers: Establishing the Importance of Grievance Evidence in Racial Discrimination Tenure Claims

Date: Jul 26, 1997
Stewart v. Rutgers: Establishing the Importance of Grievance Evidence in Racial Discrimination Tenure Claims Introduction Janice P. Stewart, a black Assistant Professor at Rutgers University's...
Smith v. Horn (1997): Due Process and Jury Instruction Clarity in Accomplice Liability for First-Degree Murder

Smith v. Horn (1997): Due Process and Jury Instruction Clarity in Accomplice Liability for First-Degree Murder

Date: Jul 25, 1997
Smith v. Horn (1997): Due Process and Jury Instruction Clarity in Accomplice Liability for First-Degree Murder Introduction Smith v. Horn, 120 F.3d 400 (3d Cir. 1997), is a significant appellate...
Enforcement of Broad Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Wyeth v. CIGNA

Enforcement of Broad Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Wyeth v. CIGNA

Date: Jul 24, 1997
Enforcement of Broad Forum Selection Clauses: Insights from Wyeth v. CIGNA Introduction The case of John Wyeth & Brother Limited v. CIGNA International Corporation, decided by the United States Court...
Impact of AEDPA on Successive 2255 Motions: Analysis of IN RE: OCSULIS DORSAINVIL

Impact of AEDPA on Successive 2255 Motions: Analysis of IN RE: OCSULIS DORSAINVIL

Date: Jul 24, 1997
Impact of AEDPA on Successive 2255 Motions: Analysis of In Re: Ocsulis Dorsainvil Introduction Case Title: IN RE: OCSULIS DORSAINVIL, PETITIONER (119 F.3d 245) Court: United States Court of Appeals,...
Revisiting Qualified Immunity and the Knock-and-Announce Rule: Insights from Kornegay v. Wilmington Police

Revisiting Qualified Immunity and the Knock-and-Announce Rule: Insights from Kornegay v. Wilmington Police

Date: Jul 24, 1997
Revisiting Qualified Immunity and the Knock-and-Announce Rule: Insights from Kornegay v. City of Wilmington Introduction The case of Kornegay v. City of Wilmington (120 F.3d 392, United States Court...
Limits on Judicial Inherent Powers in Imposing Sanctions: Insights from In Re Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation

Limits on Judicial Inherent Powers in Imposing Sanctions: Insights from In Re Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation

Date: Jul 23, 1997
Limits on Judicial Inherent Powers in Imposing Sanctions: Insights from In Re Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation Introduction The case of In Re: Tutu Wells Contamination Litigation serves as a...
Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Insights from Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh

Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Insights from Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Jul 15, 1997
Supervisor Liability in Sexual Harassment: Insights from Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction In the seminal case Robinson v. City of Pittsburgh, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert