Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Claim Preclusion in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Churchill v. Star Enterprises

Claim Preclusion in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Churchill v. Star Enterprises

Date: Jun 29, 1999
Claim Preclusion in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Churchill v. Star Enterprises Introduction Mary Churchill initiated multiple lawsuits against Star Enterprises, a/k/a Star Staff...
Bel-Ray v. Chemrite: Arbitration Clauses Enforceable Against Successor Corporations, Not Individually to Directors and Officers

Bel-Ray v. Chemrite: Arbitration Clauses Enforceable Against Successor Corporations, Not Individually to Directors and Officers

Date: Jun 29, 1999
Bel-Ray Co. v. Chemrite: Arbitration Clauses Enforceable Against Successor Corporations, Not Individually to Directors and Officers Introduction In the landmark case of Bel-Ray Company, Inc. v....
Defamation in Labor Relations: Beverly Enterprises v. Rosemary Trump

Defamation in Labor Relations: Beverly Enterprises v. Rosemary Trump

Date: Jun 29, 1999
Defamation in Labor Relations: Beverly Enterprises v. Rosemary Trump Introduction The case Beverly Enterprises, Inc.; Donald L. Dotson v. Rosemary Trump; Service Employees International Union Local...
Establishing Alienage Jurisdiction Over Hong Kong Corporations: Insights from Southern Cross Overseas Agencies v. Wah Kwong Shipping

Establishing Alienage Jurisdiction Over Hong Kong Corporations: Insights from Southern Cross Overseas Agencies v. Wah Kwong Shipping

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Establishing Alienage Jurisdiction Over Hong Kong Corporations: Insights from Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd. Introduction The case of Southern Cross Overseas...
Interpreting "Controlled By" in Disability Claims: Schaudeck v. SSA

Interpreting "Controlled By" in Disability Claims: Schaudeck v. SSA

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Interpreting "Controlled By" in Disability Claims: Schaudeck v. SSA Introduction LISA SCHAUDECK, APPELLANT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Implied Federal Preemption of Aviation Safety Standards While Preserving State Damage Remedies

Implied Federal Preemption of Aviation Safety Standards While Preserving State Damage Remedies

Date: Jun 24, 1999
Implied Federal Preemption of Aviation Safety Standards While Preserving State Damage Remedies Introduction The case of Khaled Abdullah; Khitham Abdullah; Audrey James; Eardley James; Velma George;...
Enhancing Pleading Standards in Securities Litigation: Insights from In Re Advanta Corp. Securities Litigation

Enhancing Pleading Standards in Securities Litigation: Insights from In Re Advanta Corp. Securities Litigation

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Enhancing Pleading Standards in Securities Litigation: Insights from In Re Advanta Corp. Securities Litigation Introduction The case of In Re Advanta Corp. Securities Litigation (180 F.3d 525, 3d...
Preferential Transfers and Counsel Disqualification: An Analysis of In Re First Jersey Securities, Inc.

Preferential Transfers and Counsel Disqualification: An Analysis of In Re First Jersey Securities, Inc.

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Preferential Transfers and Counsel Disqualification: An Analysis of In Re First Jersey Securities, Inc. Introduction The case of In Re First Jersey Securities, Inc., Debtor, United States Trustee;...
CEPA Retaliation and Pretext Evidence: UPS v. Blackburn Affirms Summary Judgment

CEPA Retaliation and Pretext Evidence: UPS v. Blackburn Affirms Summary Judgment

Date: Jun 8, 1999
CEPA Retaliation and Pretext Evidence: UPS v. Blackburn Affirms Summary Judgment Introduction In the landmark case of Benjamin Blackburn v. United Parcel Service, Inc., adjudicated by the United...
Indemnification and Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Indemnification and Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Date: May 26, 1999
Indemnification and Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Introduction Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty and...
Affirming Employer Liability for Innocent Misperceptions Under the ADA: Insights from Taylor v. Pathmark Stores

Affirming Employer Liability for Innocent Misperceptions Under the ADA: Insights from Taylor v. Pathmark Stores

Date: May 20, 1999
Affirming Employer Liability for Innocent Misperceptions Under the ADA: Insights from Taylor v. Pathmark Stores Introduction Joseph B. Taylor filed a lawsuit against Pathmark Stores, Inc. under the...
Custodial Interrogation Redefined: Insights from U.S. v. Leese

Custodial Interrogation Redefined: Insights from U.S. v. Leese

Date: May 19, 1999
Custodial Interrogation Redefined: Insights from U.S. v. Leese Introduction The case of United States of America v. Vicki S. Leese (176 F.3d 740) serves as a pivotal judicial decision in the realm of...
Substantial Evidence Upholding DIB Denial and Limited Weight to Chiropractor Opinions

Substantial Evidence Upholding DIB Denial and Limited Weight to Chiropractor Opinions

Date: May 19, 1999
Substantial Evidence Upholding DIB Denial and Limited Weight to Chiropractor Opinions Introduction The case of Wayne R. Hartranft v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration...
Collateral Estoppel in Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Witkowski v. Welch

Collateral Estoppel in Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Witkowski v. Welch

Date: May 18, 1999
Collateral Estoppel in Fraudulent Conveyance Claims: Witkowski v. Welch Introduction The case of Joseph A. Witkowski, M.D.; Grace Witkowski; Joseph A. Witkowski, M.D., P.C. Defined Benefit Pension...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process in Sentencing: Baker v. Barbo Commentary

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process in Sentencing: Baker v. Barbo Commentary

Date: May 14, 1999
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process in Sentencing: Baker v. Barbo Introduction The appellate case of James Baker v. James F. Barbo, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey (177 F.3d...
Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Date: May 14, 1999
Federal Courts Reject New Jersey's Entire Controversy Doctrine in Diversity Jurisdiction Cases Introduction The case of Paramount Aviation Corporation v. Gruppo Agusta adjudicated by the United...
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America

Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America

Date: May 12, 1999
Claim Preclusion in Bankruptcy Reorganization: CoreStates Bank v. Huls America Introduction The case CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. Huls America, Inc. (176 F.3d 187) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros

Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros

Date: May 6, 1999
Contempt Liability Limited to Direct Violations or Aiding and Abetting: Max's Seafood Cafe v. Quinteros Introduction In the case of Max's Seafood Cafe, by Lou-Ann, Inc., Successor to Max's Seafood...
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation

Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation

Date: May 1, 1999
Preservation of Attorney-Client Privilege for Attorneys Acting as Consultants: A Third Circuit Analysis in Montgomery County v. MicroVote Corporation Introduction The case of Montgomery County,...
Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions

Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions

Date: Apr 29, 1999
Carter v. City of Philadelphia: Limiting Eleventh Amendment Immunity for Administrative Functions Introduction In Carter v. City of Philadelphia, 181 F.3d 339 (3d Cir. 1999), Raymond Carter appealed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert