Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Mandated Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Plummer v. Apfel

Mandated Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Plummer v. Apfel

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Mandated Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Plummer v. Apfel Introduction Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security (186...
Trademark Priority Requires Substantial Use in Commerce: Third Circuit Upholds LTI's Rights over LIM

Trademark Priority Requires Substantial Use in Commerce: Third Circuit Upholds LTI's Rights over LIM

Date: Aug 4, 1999
Trademark Priority Requires Substantial Use in Commerce: Third Circuit Upholds LTI's Rights over LIM Introduction The legal landscape surrounding trademark rights is pivotal in determining the...
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Proper Procedure in Excluding Expert Evidence in Products Liability Claims

Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Proper Procedure in Excluding Expert Evidence in Products Liability Claims

Date: Aug 3, 1999
Third Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment: Proper Procedure in Excluding Expert Evidence in Products Liability Claims Introduction The case of Daniel G. Padillas v. Stork-Gamco, Inc. (186 F.3d 412)...
Public Disclosures and the Qui Tam Jurisdictional Bar: An Analysis of Mistick PBT v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh

Public Disclosures and the Qui Tam Jurisdictional Bar: An Analysis of Mistick PBT v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh

Date: Jul 31, 1999
Public Disclosures and the Qui Tam Jurisdictional Bar: An Analysis of Mistick PBT v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh Introduction The case of United States of America ex rel. Mistick PBT and Mistick...
Affirmation of No Protected Liberty Interest in Community Release Programs under Due Process: Asquith v. Department of Corrections

Affirmation of No Protected Liberty Interest in Community Release Programs under Due Process: Asquith v. Department of Corrections

Date: Jul 31, 1999
Affirmation of No Protected Liberty Interest in Community Release Programs under Due Process: Asquith v. Department of Corrections Introduction The case of William Eugene Asquith v. Department of...
Reevaluation of Excessive Force Standards in Fourth Amendment Claims: Vanessa Abraham v. Kimberly Raso

Reevaluation of Excessive Force Standards in Fourth Amendment Claims: Vanessa Abraham v. Kimberly Raso

Date: Jul 27, 1999
Reevaluation of Excessive Force Standards in Fourth Amendment Claims: Vanessa Abraham v. Kimberly Raso Introduction In the case of Vanessa Abraham, et al. v. Kimberly Raso, et al., the United States...
Establishing Standards for Break-Up Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc.

Establishing Standards for Break-Up Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc.

Date: Jul 20, 1999
Establishing Standards for Break-Up Fees in Bankruptcy Proceedings: In Re O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc. Introduction The case of Calpine Corporation v. O'Brien Environmental Energy, Inc. serves...
Defining the Scope of Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering: Insights from United States v. Vincent R. Davis

Defining the Scope of Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering: Insights from United States v. Vincent R. Davis

Date: Jul 20, 1999
Defining the Scope of Obstruction of Justice and Witness Tampering: Insights from United States of America v. Vincent R. Davis Introduction United States of America v. Vincent R. Davis, 183 F.3d 231...
Third Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in Securities Fraud Claims: Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.

Third Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in Securities Fraud Claims: Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc.

Date: Jul 20, 1999
Third Circuit Clarifies Materiality Standards in Securities Fraud Claims: Re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Rockefeller Center Properties, Inc. Securities...
Direct Forfeiture of Commingled Funds in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from United States v. Allen W. Stewart

Direct Forfeiture of Commingled Funds in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from United States v. Allen W. Stewart

Date: Jul 17, 1999
Direct Forfeiture of Commingled Funds in Money Laundering Cases: Insights from United States v. Allen W. Stewart Introduction In United States of America v. Allen W. Stewart, 185 F.3d 112 (3d Cir....
Establishing Antitrust Standing for Competitors: Insights from Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital

Establishing Antitrust Standing for Competitors: Insights from Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital

Date: Jul 17, 1999
Establishing Antitrust Standing for Competitors: Insights from Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital Introduction Angelico v. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Inc., 184 F.3d 268 (3d Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case...
Judicial Estoppel: Proper Application Reinforced in Klein v. Stahl GmbH

Judicial Estoppel: Proper Application Reinforced in Klein v. Stahl GmbH

Date: Jul 16, 1999
Judicial Estoppel: Proper Application Reinforced in Klein v. Stahl GmbH Introduction The case of Janet Martin Klein v. Stahl GMBH Co. Maschinefabrik and Heidelberg USA, decided by the United States...
Tourscher v. McCullough: Defining Thirteenth Amendment Protections for Pretrial Detainees and FLSA Applicability in Prisons

Tourscher v. McCullough: Defining Thirteenth Amendment Protections for Pretrial Detainees and FLSA Applicability in Prisons

Date: Jul 13, 1999
Tourscher v. McCullough: Defining Thirteenth Amendment Protections for Pretrial Detainees and FLSA Applicability in Prisons Introduction Tourscher v. McCullough is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Third Circuit Affirms Pension Offset Policy in Leheny v. City of Pittsburgh

Third Circuit Affirms Pension Offset Policy in Leheny v. City of Pittsburgh

Date: Jul 8, 1999
Third Circuit Affirms Pension Offset Policy in Leheny v. City of Pittsburgh Introduction The case of Thomas E. Leheny, James R. Ramsey, and Arthur Marunich v. City of Pittsburgh addressed significant...
Upholding Public Indecency Ordinance: Analysis of D'Angio v. Borough of Nescopeck

Upholding Public Indecency Ordinance: Analysis of D'Angio v. Borough of Nescopeck

Date: Jul 7, 1999
Upholding Public Indecency Ordinance: Analysis of D'Angio v. Borough of Nescopeck Introduction The case of Decio D'Angio v. Borough of Nescopeck, decided on July 6, 1999, by the United States...
Third Circuit Affirms Enforcement of Unilateral Arbitration Clauses: Mutuality Not a Prerequisite

Third Circuit Affirms Enforcement of Unilateral Arbitration Clauses: Mutuality Not a Prerequisite

Date: Jul 2, 1999
Third Circuit Affirms Enforcement of Unilateral Arbitration Clauses: Mutuality Not a Prerequisite Introduction In Harris v. Green Tree Financial Corporation, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Third Circuit Upholds Antitrust Claims in Beer Distribution RICO Case

Third Circuit Upholds Antitrust Claims in Beer Distribution RICO Case

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Third Circuit Upholds Antitrust Claims in Beer Distribution RICO Case Introduction In the landmark case of Callahan et al. v. A.E.V., Inc. et al. (182 F.3d 237, 3rd Cir. 1999), the United States...
Resorts International v. Lowenschuss: Clarifying Fraud and Mistake in Securities Transactions

Resorts International v. Lowenschuss: Clarifying Fraud and Mistake in Securities Transactions

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Resorts International v. Lowenschuss: Clarifying Fraud and Mistake in Securities Transactions Introduction The case of In re: Resorts International, Inc. (181 F.3d 505) adjudicated by the United...
Upholding Prison Regulations: Applying the Safley Test to N.J.S.A. 2C:47-10

Upholding Prison Regulations: Applying the Safley Test to N.J.S.A. 2C:47-10

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Upholding Prison Regulations: Applying the Safley Test to N.J.S.A. 2C:47-10 Introduction The case of Richard Waterman; Michael Curtis v. John Farmer, Jr., et al. revolves around the constitutionality...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Class Actions: Insights from Rouse v. Plantier

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Class Actions: Insights from Rouse v. Plantier

Date: Jun 30, 1999
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Eighth Amendment Class Actions: Insights from Rouse v. Plantier Introduction Darryl Leon Rouse v. William Plantier, et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert