Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause

Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Tenafly Eruv Association, Inc. v. Borough of...
Third Circuit Reaffirms Direct Evidence Standards in ADEA Termination Claims: Fakete v. Aetna

Third Circuit Reaffirms Direct Evidence Standards in ADEA Termination Claims: Fakete v. Aetna

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Third Circuit Reaffirms Direct Evidence Standards in ADEA Termination Claims: Fakete v. Aetna Introduction Stephen Fakete filed a lawsuit against Aetna, Inc. under the Age Discrimination in...
Prejudicial Spillover and Ineffective Assistance in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Cross v. United States

Prejudicial Spillover and Ineffective Assistance in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Cross v. United States

Date: Oct 19, 2002
Prejudicial Spillover and Ineffective Assistance in Appellate Proceedings: Insights from Cross v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Walter V. Cross, a/k/a...
Reaffirming the 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Zoning Law: CONGREGATION KOL AMI v. ABINGTON TOWNSHIP

Reaffirming the 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Zoning Law: CONGREGATION KOL AMI v. ABINGTON TOWNSHIP

Date: Oct 17, 2002
Reaffirming the 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Zoning Law: CONGREGATION KOL AMI v. ABINGTON TOWNSHIP Introduction CONGREGATION KOL AMI v. ABINGTON TOWNSHIP is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Clarifying the Boundaries of Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases

Clarifying the Boundaries of Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases

Date: Oct 12, 2002
Clarifying the Boundaries of Probable Cause and Search Incident to Arrest in Domestic Violence Cases Introduction In United States of America v. Clifton Myers, 308 F.3d 251 (3d Cir. 2002), the United...
Limitations on Federal Habeas Review of Parole Revocation Decisions Under AEDPA: Insights from HUNTERSON v. DISABATO

Limitations on Federal Habeas Review of Parole Revocation Decisions Under AEDPA: Insights from HUNTERSON v. DISABATO

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Limitations on Federal Habeas Review of Parole Revocation Decisions Under AEDPA: Insights from HUNTERSON v. DISABATO Introduction In Neil Hunterson v. Mary Keating DiSabato, et al. (308 F.3d 236,...
Summary Judgment Upholds Strict Standards in Employment Discrimination Case: Shirley Ogden v. Keystone Residence

Summary Judgment Upholds Strict Standards in Employment Discrimination Case: Shirley Ogden v. Keystone Residence

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Summary Judgment Upholds Strict Standards in Employment Discrimination Case: Shirley Ogden v. Keystone Residence Introduction In Shirley Ogden v. Keystone Residence, Pamela Covert, Joe Bergen, Dottie...
Balancing Probative Value and Prejudice: Exclusion of EEOC Letter of Determination under Federal Rule of Evidence 403

Balancing Probative Value and Prejudice: Exclusion of EEOC Letter of Determination under Federal Rule of Evidence 403

Date: Oct 10, 2002
Balancing Probative Value and Prejudice: Exclusion of EEOC Letter of Determination under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 Introduction In the appellate case of Mary A. Coleman v. Home Depot, Inc., the...
Third Circuit Upholds Executive Authority to Close Special Interest Deportation Hearings in Ashcroft v. North Jersey Media Group

Third Circuit Upholds Executive Authority to Close Special Interest Deportation Hearings in Ashcroft v. North Jersey Media Group

Date: Oct 9, 2002
Third Circuit Upholds Executive Authority to Close Special Interest Deportation Hearings in Ashcroft v. North Jersey Media Group Introduction In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist...
Administrative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Under PLRA: Insights from Concepcion v. Morton

Administrative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Under PLRA: Insights from Concepcion v. Morton

Date: Oct 8, 2002
Administrative Remedies Must Be Exhausted Under PLRA: Insights from Concepcion v. Morton Introduction Concepcion v. Morton, 306 F.3d 1347 (3d Cir. 2002), is a landmark decision by the United States...
In re NAHC, Inc. Securities Litigation: Establishing Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims

In re NAHC, Inc. Securities Litigation: Establishing Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims

Date: Oct 4, 2002
In re NAHC, Inc. Securities Litigation: Establishing Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims Introduction In the appellate case In re NAHC, Inc. Securities Litigation (306 F.3d 1314), the...
Balancing Free Speech and School Safety: Insights from Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education

Balancing Free Speech and School Safety: Insights from Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education

Date: Oct 4, 2002
Balancing Free Speech and School Safety: Insights from Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education Introduction The case of Sypniewski v. Warren Hills Regional Board of Education (307 F.3d...
Strengthening Software Copyright Enforcement and Trade Secret Protections in Geac v. Grace

Strengthening Software Copyright Enforcement and Trade Secret Protections in Geac v. Grace

Date: Sep 25, 2002
Strengthening Software Copyright Enforcement and Trade Secret Protections in Geac Computer Systems v. Grace Consulting Introduction The case of Dun & Bradstreet Software Services, Inc.; Geac Computer...
Third Circuit Ruling on Reasonable Accommodations for "Regarded As" Disabled Employees Under ADA and PHRA

Third Circuit Ruling on Reasonable Accommodations for "Regarded As" Disabled Employees Under ADA and PHRA

Date: Sep 21, 2002
Third Circuit Ruling on Reasonable Accommodations for "Regarded As" Disabled Employees Under ADA and PHRA Introduction In the landmark case of Willard Buskirk v. Apollo Metals; PMA Insurance Group,...
Good Faith Exception and Particularity in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. Kim's Wholesale Distributors, Inc.

Good Faith Exception and Particularity in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. Kim's Wholesale Distributors, Inc.

Date: Sep 21, 2002
Good Faith Exception and Particularity in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. Kim's Wholesale Distributors, Inc. Introduction United States of America v. Ninety-Two Thousand Four Hundred Twenty-Two...
Federal Sentencing Adjustments for Concurrent State and Federal Sentences under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c): Ruggiano v. Reish

Federal Sentencing Adjustments for Concurrent State and Federal Sentences under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c): Ruggiano v. Reish

Date: Sep 20, 2002
Federal Sentencing Adjustments for Concurrent State and Federal Sentences under U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c): Ruggiano v. Reish Introduction The case of Anthony Ruggiano, Jr., Appellant, v. R.M. Reish, Warden...
Expert Testimony Challenges in Civil Rights Litigation: Walker v. Gordon and the Application of Daubert Standards

Expert Testimony Challenges in Civil Rights Litigation: Walker v. Gordon and the Application of Daubert Standards

Date: Sep 18, 2002
Expert Testimony Challenges in Civil Rights Litigation: Walker v. Gordon and the Application of Daubert Standards Introduction The case of Francis X. Walker v. William Gordon, Officer; Leo Sides,...
Reasonable Suspicion in Public Bus Stops: United States v. Robertson

Reasonable Suspicion in Public Bus Stops: United States v. Robertson

Date: Sep 14, 2002
Reasonable Suspicion in Public Bus Stops: United States v. Robertson Introduction United States of America v. Mitchell Robertson, 305 F.3d 164 (3rd Cir. 2002), presents a significant examination of...
Marshall v. Hendricks (Third Circuit, 2002): Affirmation of Guilt Phase and Remand for Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Marshall v. Hendricks (Third Circuit, 2002): Affirmation of Guilt Phase and Remand for Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Sep 12, 2002
Marshall v. Hendricks (Third Circuit, 2002): Affirmation of Guilt Phase and Remand for Penalty Phase Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Marshall v. Hendricks is a significant case...
Due Process Protections Against Coerced Statements: Insights from Choi Chun Lam v. Kelchner

Due Process Protections Against Coerced Statements: Insights from Choi Chun Lam v. Kelchner

Date: Sep 11, 2002
Due Process Protections Against Coerced Statements: Insights from Choi Chun Lam v. Kelchner Introduction In the landmark case of Choi Chun Lam v. Donald Kelchner, Superintendent; the District...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert