Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of FTAIA as a Barrier to Extraterritorial Sherman Act Claims: Turicentro, S.A. v. American Airlines Inc.

Affirmation of FTAIA as a Barrier to Extraterritorial Sherman Act Claims: Turicentro, S.A. v. American Airlines Inc.

Date: Sep 10, 2002
Affirmation of FTAIA as a Barrier to Extraterritorial Sherman Act Claims: Turicentro, S.A. v. American Airlines Inc. Introduction In the case of Turicentro, S.A. et al. v. American Airlines Inc. et...
Affirmation of Class Certification in Antitrust Litigation: Winoff Industries v. Stone Container Corporation

Affirmation of Class Certification in Antitrust Litigation: Winoff Industries v. Stone Container Corporation

Date: Sep 6, 2002
Affirmation of Class Certification in Antitrust Litigation: Winoff Industries v. Stone Container Corporation Introduction The case of Winoff Industries, Inc. v. Stone Container Corporation involves a...
Limitations on First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Ambrose v. Township of Robinson

Limitations on First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Ambrose v. Township of Robinson

Date: Sep 5, 2002
Limitations on First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Ambrose v. Township of Robinson Introduction Ambrose v. Township of Robinson is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC: Upholding Fiduciary Standards under the Investment Company Act

Affirmation of Dismissal in Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC: Upholding Fiduciary Standards under the Investment Company Act

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Affirmation of Dismissal in Krantz v. Prudential Investments Fund Management LLC: Upholding Fiduciary Standards under the Investment Company Act Introduction In the case of Sheldon KRANTZ, Appellant...
Reaffirming Due Process Protections: United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson

Reaffirming Due Process Protections: United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson

Date: Aug 27, 2002
Reaffirming Due Process Protections: United States v. Gene Barrett Johnson Introduction United States of America v. Gene Barrett Johnson, a/k/a Gexex Johnson, 302 F.3d 139, is a pivotal case...
Affidavit of Merit Timeliness in Amended Malpractice Suits: Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hospital Sets New Precedent

Affidavit of Merit Timeliness in Amended Malpractice Suits: Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hospital Sets New Precedent

Date: Aug 23, 2002
Affidavit of Merit Timeliness in Amended Malpractice Suits: Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hospital Sets New Precedent Introduction Snyder v. Pascack Valley Hospital, 303 F.3d 271 (3d Cir. 2002), is a...
Enhancing Defendant Protections: The Right to Self-Representation in United States v. Ronnie Peppers

Enhancing Defendant Protections: The Right to Self-Representation in United States v. Ronnie Peppers

Date: Aug 22, 2002
Enhancing Defendant Protections: The Right to Self-Representation in United States v. Ronnie Peppers Introduction United States v. Ronnie Peppers, 302 F.3d 120 (3d Cir. 2002), is a landmark decision...
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity under the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Waiver of Sovereign Immunity under the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Date: Aug 22, 2002
Waiver of Sovereign Immunity under the Rehabilitation Act: Insights from George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Introduction The case of George Koslow v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, decided...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in Trademark Infringement Cases: Insights from Betterbox Communications Ltd. v. Black Box Corporation

Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in Trademark Infringement Cases: Insights from Betterbox Communications Ltd. v. Black Box Corporation

Date: Aug 14, 2002
Admissibility of Expert Testimony and Newly Discovered Evidence in Trademark Infringement Cases: Insights from Betterbox Communications Ltd. v. Black Box Corporation Introduction Betterbox...
One-Year Limitation Period in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Woods v. Kearney

One-Year Limitation Period in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Woods v. Kearney

Date: Aug 10, 2002
One-Year Limitation Period in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Woods v. Kearney Introduction Woods v. Kearney, 215 F. Supp.2d 458 (D. Del. 2002), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Third Circuit Upholds NLRB's Finding of Anti-Union Animus in Hiring Decisions

Third Circuit Upholds NLRB's Finding of Anti-Union Animus in Hiring Decisions

Date: Aug 9, 2002
Third Circuit Upholds NLRB's Finding of Anti-Union Animus in Hiring Decisions Introduction The case of NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. FES (301 F.3d 83) centers on allegations that FES, a division...
Assessing Credibility and Documentary Corroboration in Asylum Proceedings: Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft

Assessing Credibility and Documentary Corroboration in Asylum Proceedings: Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft

Date: Aug 8, 2002
Assessing Credibility and Documentary Corroboration in Asylum Proceedings: Chen Yun Gao v. Ashcroft Introduction Chen Yun Gao v. John Ashcroft, 299 F.3d 266 (3d Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case in U.S....
Third Circuit Court Reiterates Necessity of Factual Resolution in Qualified Immunity Claims

Third Circuit Court Reiterates Necessity of Factual Resolution in Qualified Immunity Claims

Date: Aug 3, 2002
Third Circuit Court Reiterates Necessity of Factual Resolution in Qualified Immunity Claims Introduction The case of Cor v. Curley (298 F.3d 271, 2002) presents a pivotal examination of the qualified...
Clarifying 'Related To' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.

Clarifying 'Related To' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc.

Date: Aug 1, 2002
Clarifying 'Related To' Jurisdiction in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. Introduction In the complex landscape of bankruptcy law, determining the scope of...
Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials: Smathers v. Multi-Tool, Inc. Establishes New Standards

Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials: Smathers v. Multi-Tool, Inc. Establishes New Standards

Date: Aug 1, 2002
Heightened Scrutiny in ERISA Benefit Denials: Smathers v. Multi-Tool, Inc. Establishes New Standards Introduction In the landmark case of Smathers v. Multi-Tool, Inc., decided by the United States...
Substance Over Form in Employee Benefit Plans: Insights from Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Substance Over Form in Employee Benefit Plans: Insights from Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Date: Jul 30, 2002
Substance Over Form in Employee Benefit Plans: Insights from Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Introduction The case of Neonatology Associates, P.A. v. Commissioner of...
Administrative Expense Allocation in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Hechinger Investment Co.

Administrative Expense Allocation in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Hechinger Investment Co.

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Administrative Expense Allocation in Bankruptcy: Insights from In re Hechinger Investment Co. Introduction The case of In re Hechinger Investment Company of Delaware, Debtor. Former Employees of...
Routine Border Patdowns Remain Constitutional; Equal Protection Claims Require Substantial Evidence

Routine Border Patdowns Remain Constitutional; Equal Protection Claims Require Substantial Evidence

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Routine Border Patdowns Remain Constitutional; Equal Protection Claims Require Substantial Evidence Introduction In Yvette Bradley v. The United States of America et al., adjudicated by the United...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity for State Officials in Enforcing Federally Approved State Programs: The Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs Decision

Eleventh Amendment Immunity for State Officials in Enforcing Federally Approved State Programs: The Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs Decision

Date: Jul 25, 2002
Eleventh Amendment Immunity for State Officials in Enforcing Federally Approved State Programs: The Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs Decision Introduction The case of Pennsylvania...
Conrail v. Appellants: Emphasizing the Need for Demonstrating Retained Similarly Situated Younger Employees in ADEA RIF Claims

Conrail v. Appellants: Emphasizing the Need for Demonstrating Retained Similarly Situated Younger Employees in ADEA RIF Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2002
Conrail v. Appellants: Emphasizing the Need for Demonstrating Retained Similarly Situated Younger Employees in ADEA RIF Claims Introduction In the landmark decision of Consolidated Railroad...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert