Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

3d Circuit Case Commentaries

Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Proceedings: Younger Abstention Affirmed

Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Proceedings: Younger Abstention Affirmed

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Proceedings: Younger Abstention Affirmed Introduction The case of Michael Anthony, Individually and on Behalf of all Persons Similarly Situated; Anne...
Defining 'Principal Place of Business' in Diversity Jurisdiction: The Grand Union Supermarkets Case

Defining 'Principal Place of Business' in Diversity Jurisdiction: The Grand Union Supermarkets Case

Date: Jan 17, 2003
Defining 'Principal Place of Business' in Diversity Jurisdiction: The Grand Union Supermarkets Case Introduction Grand Union Supermarkets of the Virgin Islands, Inc. v. H.E. Lockhart Management, Inc....
Section 230 Immunity Reinforced: AOL's Shield Against Third-Party Content Liability

Section 230 Immunity Reinforced: AOL's Shield Against Third-Party Content Liability

Date: Jan 17, 2003
Section 230 Immunity Reinforced: AOL's Shield Against Third-Party Content Liability Introduction The case of John Green v. America Online (AOL); John Does 1 & 2 presents a pivotal examination of the...
Adoption of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard Over 'Improper Motive' in Substantive Due Process Land-Use Claims

Adoption of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard Over 'Improper Motive' in Substantive Due Process Land-Use Claims

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Adoption of 'Shocks the Conscience' Standard Over 'Improper Motive' in Substantive Due Process Land-Use Claims Introduction United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township of Warrington, PA is a...
Issue Preclusion Affirmed in Sentinel Trust Co. v. Universal Bonding Insurance Co.

Issue Preclusion Affirmed in Sentinel Trust Co. v. Universal Bonding Insurance Co.

Date: Jan 9, 2003
Issue Preclusion Affirmed in Sentinel Trust Co. v. Universal Bonding Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Sentinel Trust Company v. Universal Bonding Insurance Company (316 F.3d 213, 3rd Cir. 2003)...
Expanding the Reach of 26 U.S.C. §7206(2): Insights from United States v. Gambone

Expanding the Reach of 26 U.S.C. §7206(2): Insights from United States v. Gambone

Date: Jan 4, 2003
Expanding the Reach of 26 U.S.C. §7206(2): Insights from United States v. Gambone Introduction United States of America v. John A. Gambone, Sr. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Equitable Tolling of Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations in Johnson v. Hendricks

Equitable Tolling of Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations in Johnson v. Hendricks

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Equitable Tolling of Habeas Corpus Statute of Limitations in Johnson v. Hendricks Introduction Wade Johnson, Appellant, v. Roy L. Hendricks, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, 314 F.3d 159...
Guardianship Appointment and Time-Bar Tolling for Injured Minors: Gibbs v. Carnival Cruise Lines

Guardianship Appointment and Time-Bar Tolling for Injured Minors: Gibbs v. Carnival Cruise Lines

Date: Dec 21, 2002
Guardianship Appointment and Time-Bar Tolling for Injured Minors: Gibbs v. Carnival Cruise Lines United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 2002 Introduction Gibbs v. Carnival Cruise Lines is a...
Racial Profiling and Qualified Immunity: Analysis of Carrasca v. Pomeroy (313 F.3d 828)

Racial Profiling and Qualified Immunity: Analysis of Carrasca v. Pomeroy (313 F.3d 828)

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Racial Profiling and Qualified Immunity: Analysis of Carrasca v. Pomeroy (313 F.3d 828) Introduction The case of Marco Antonio Carrasca; Fidel Figueroa; Abimael Figueroa; Rigoberto Vales Barreras,...
Establishing Supervisory Rules for Qualified Immunity Summary Judgments in the Third Circuit

Establishing Supervisory Rules for Qualified Immunity Summary Judgments in the Third Circuit

Date: Dec 12, 2002
Establishing Supervisory Rules for Qualified Immunity Summary Judgments in the Third Circuit Introduction The case of Lorenzo A. Forbes; Ella M. Forbes, in their Own Right and as Co-Administrators of...
Comprehensive Hypothetical Incorporation of Mental Impairments: Burns v. Barnhart

Comprehensive Hypothetical Incorporation of Mental Impairments: Burns v. Barnhart

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Comprehensive Hypothetical Incorporation of Mental Impairments: Burns v. Barnhart Introduction Burns v. Barnhart, 312 F.3d 113 (3rd Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case addressing the requirements for...
Reaffirming the Standards for Civil Contempt Under AEDPA: Chadwick v. Janecka

Reaffirming the Standards for Civil Contempt Under AEDPA: Chadwick v. Janecka

Date: Dec 5, 2002
Reaffirming the Standards for Civil Contempt Under AEDPA: Chadwick v. Janecka Introduction In the case of H. Beatty Chadwick v. James Janecka, Warden, Delaware County Prison; the District Attorney of...
Gagliardo v. Connaught Laboratories: Affirmation of ADA Disability Definition and Damages Apportionment

Gagliardo v. Connaught Laboratories: Affirmation of ADA Disability Definition and Damages Apportionment

Date: Nov 23, 2002
Gagliardo v. Connaught Laboratories: Affirmation of ADA Disability Definition and Damages Apportionment Introduction Jane A. Gagliardo and John Gagliardo filed a lawsuit against Connaught...
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 669: Strengthening Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause in Healthcare Fraud Cases

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 669: Strengthening Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause in Healthcare Fraud Cases

Date: Nov 20, 2002
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 669: Strengthening Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause in Healthcare Fraud Cases Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ruth Whited,...
Affirmation of Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Zayas v. INS

Affirmation of Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Zayas v. INS

Date: Nov 19, 2002
Affirmation of Abuse of the Writ Doctrine in Zayas v. INS Introduction In Raniel Perez Zayas v. Immigration Naturalization Service, 311 F.3d 247 (3rd Cir. 2002), the United States Court of Appeals...
State Waiver of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense and Affirmative Defense Timing: Robinson v. Johnson

State Waiver of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense and Affirmative Defense Timing: Robinson v. Johnson

Date: Nov 19, 2002
State Waiver of AEDPA's Statute of Limitations Defense and Affirmative Defense Timing: Robinson v. Johnson Introduction In Eric Robinson v. Philip L. Johnson; the District Attorney of the County of...
Affirming the Physical Loss Standard in First-Party 'All Risks' Insurance Policies: Insights from Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Defendants

Affirming the Physical Loss Standard in First-Party 'All Risks' Insurance Policies: Insights from Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Defendants

Date: Nov 15, 2002
Affirming the Physical Loss Standard in First-Party 'All Risks' Insurance Policies: Insights from Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Defendants Introduction The case of Port Authority of...
Reaffirming Stringent Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation: IN RE ROCKEFELLER CENTER PROPERTIES, Inc. Securities Litigation

Reaffirming Stringent Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation: IN RE ROCKEFELLER CENTER PROPERTIES, Inc. Securities Litigation

Date: Nov 9, 2002
Reaffirming Stringent Pleading Standards in Securities Fraud Litigation: IN RE ROCKEFELLER CENTER PROPERTIES, Inc. Securities Litigation Introduction The case of IN RE ROCKEFELLER CENTER PROPERTIES,...
Dismissal of Probation Revocation Appeal in United States v. Charles Kissinger

Dismissal of Probation Revocation Appeal in United States v. Charles Kissinger

Date: Oct 30, 2002
Dismissal of Probation Revocation Appeal in United States v. Charles Kissinger Introduction United States v. Charles Kissinger, 309 F.3d 179 (3d Cir. 2002), addresses the issue of mootness in the...
Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause

Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Selective Enforcement of Facially Neutral Ordinances Against Religious Practices Violates Free Exercise Clause Introduction In the landmark case of Tenafly Eruv Association, Inc. v. Borough of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert