Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of RICO Dismissal Based on Standing in Lerner v. Fleet Bank

Affirmation of RICO Dismissal Based on Standing in Lerner v. Fleet Bank

Date: Jan 23, 2003
Affirmation of District Court's Dismissal of RICO Claims for Lack of Standing in Lerner v. Fleet Bank Introduction In the case of Isaac Lerner et al. v. Fleet Bank, N.A., decided on January 22, 2003,...
Timeliness of Title VII Claims for Rejected Religious Accommodations: Elmenayer v. ABF Freight Systems

Timeliness of Title VII Claims for Rejected Religious Accommodations: Elmenayer v. ABF Freight Systems

Date: Jan 23, 2003
Timeliness of Title VII Claims for Rejected Religious Accommodations: Elmenayer v. ABF Freight Systems Introduction In the landmark case Amr F. Elmenayer v. ABF Freight System, Inc., decided by the...
Conversion of Mutual Insurance Companies Does Not Constitute State Action Under §1983: Tancredi v. MetLife

Conversion of Mutual Insurance Companies Does Not Constitute State Action Under §1983: Tancredi v. MetLife

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Conversion of Mutual Insurance Companies Does Not Constitute State Action Under §1983: Tancredi v. MetLife Introduction Tancredi and Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Mutual to Stock Conversion: Cranley v. National Life Insurance Co. of Vermont

Affirmation of Dismissal in Mutual to Stock Conversion: Cranley v. National Life Insurance Co. of Vermont

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Affirmation of Dismissal in Mutual to Stock Conversion: Cranley v. National Life Insurance Co. of Vermont Introduction In the landmark case John J. Cranley, III, Julius Grad, and Walter J. Birdsall,...
Second Circuit Holds 42 U.S.C. § 1981’s Equal Benefit Clause Does Not Require State Action

Second Circuit Holds 42 U.S.C. § 1981’s Equal Benefit Clause Does Not Require State Action

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Second Circuit Holds 42 U.S.C. § 1981’s Equal Benefit Clause Does Not Require State Action Introduction In Phillip et al. v. University of Rochester et al. (316 F.3d 291, Second Circuit, 2003), the...
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Municipal Liability: Insights from Valencia v. Lee

Supplemental Jurisdiction and Municipal Liability: Insights from Valencia v. Lee

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Municipal Liability: Insights from Valencia v. Lee Introduction Christian R. Valencia, an Infant by his Mother and Natural Guardian, Teresa Franco, Plaintiff-Appellee,...
Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Disparate Impact Fair Housing Case in Huntington

Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Disparate Impact Fair Housing Case in Huntington

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Preliminary Injunction in Disparate Impact Fair Housing Case in Huntington Introduction The case of Fair Housing in Huntington Committee Inc. v. Town of Huntington...
Second Circuit Affirms Employer Liability in Religious Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Second Circuit Affirms Employer Liability in Religious Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Second Circuit Affirms Employer Liability in Religious Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Mandell v. County of Suffolk Introduction In the landmark case of Howard E. Mandell v. The County of...
Ford v. s-Cinque: Implications for Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity

Ford v. s-Cinque: Implications for Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity

Date: Jan 18, 2003
Ford v. s-Cinque: Implications for Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity Introduction In Ford, Plata, Walcott, Rivas-Cinque, Plummer, and Clay v. s-Cinque et al., the United States Court of...
PATSY'S BRAND, INC. v. I.O.B. REALTY, INC.: Establishing Precedents in Trademark Infringement and Legal Sanctions

PATSY'S BRAND, INC. v. I.O.B. REALTY, INC.: Establishing Precedents in Trademark Infringement and Legal Sanctions

Date: Jan 17, 2003
PATSY'S BRAND, INC. v. I.O.B. REALTY, INC.: Establishing Precedents in Trademark Infringement and Legal Sanctions Introduction The case of Patsy's Brand, Inc. v. I.O.B. Realty, Inc. (317 F.3d 209)...
Curry v. City of Syracuse: Clarifying Excessive Force and False Arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Curry v. City of Syracuse: Clarifying Excessive Force and False Arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Curry v. City of Syracuse: Clarifying Excessive Force and False Arrest under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction Benny Curry, the plaintiff-appellant, filed a lawsuit against the City of Syracuse and...
Refining Prejudice Analysis in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under 28 U.S.C § 2255 – Pham v. United States

Refining Prejudice Analysis in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under 28 U.S.C § 2255 – Pham v. United States

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Refining Prejudice Analysis in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims under 28 U.S.C § 2255 – Pham v. United States 1. Introduction Pham v. United States, 317 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2003), is a notable...
Reaffirming Due Process Protections for Temporary Release Revocations: Anderson v. Recore

Reaffirming Due Process Protections for Temporary Release Revocations: Anderson v. Recore

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Reaffirming Due Process Protections for Temporary Release Revocations: Anderson v. Recore Introduction Simon Anderson v. James F. Recore, Director, Temporary Release Programs, Department of...
Defining Infertility Discrimination under Title VII and PDA: Comprehensive Insights from Saks v. Franklin Covey Co.

Defining Infertility Discrimination under Title VII and PDA: Comprehensive Insights from Saks v. Franklin Covey Co.

Date: Jan 16, 2003
Defining Infertility Discrimination under Title VII and PDA: Comprehensive Insights from Saks v. Franklin Covey Co. Introduction The case of Rochelle SAKS v. FRANKLIN COVEY CO. addressed pivotal...
Enforcement of Prevailing Wages and Overtime under DBA and FLSA: Limited Private Remedies Affirmed

Enforcement of Prevailing Wages and Overtime under DBA and FLSA: Limited Private Remedies Affirmed

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Enforcement of Prevailing Wages and Overtime under DBA and FLSA: Limited Private Remedies Affirmed Introduction In Jan Grochowski et al. v. Phoenix Construction et al. (318 F.3d 80, 2d Cir. 2003),...
Serious Medical Need in Eighth Amendment Claims: Analysis of Smith v. Carpenter

Serious Medical Need in Eighth Amendment Claims: Analysis of Smith v. Carpenter

Date: Jan 15, 2003
Serious Medical Need in Eighth Amendment Claims: Analysis of Smith v. Carpenter Introduction Smith v. Carpenter, 316 F.3d 178 (2d Cir. 2003) is a significant appellate decision addressing the...
Arbitrability in NASD Rule Disputes: The BENSADOUN v. JOBE-RIAT Decision

Arbitrability in NASD Rule Disputes: The BENSADOUN v. JOBE-RIAT Decision

Date: Jan 14, 2003
Arbitrability in NASD Rule Disputes: The BENSADOUN v. JOBE-RIAT Decision Introduction The case of Jean Bensadoun v. Marie Therese Jobe-Riat et al. adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Policymaker Exception in First Amendment Retaliation: Camacho v. Brandon

Policymaker Exception in First Amendment Retaliation: Camacho v. Brandon

Date: Jan 11, 2003
Policymaker Exception in First Amendment Retaliation: Camacho v. Brandon Introduction Martin Camacho v. Symra D. Brandon and City of Yonkers is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions and AEDPA's Authorization Requirement: Torres v. Senkowski Commentary

Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions and AEDPA's Authorization Requirement: Torres v. Senkowski Commentary

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions and AEDPA's Authorization Requirement: Torres v. Senkowski Commentary Introduction Torres v. Senkowski is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for DMV Investigators in Malicious Prosecution Claims

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for DMV Investigators in Malicious Prosecution Claims

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for DMV Investigators in Malicious Prosecution Claims Introduction In Da v. d KINZER, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert