Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Reevaluating Probable Cause and Legal Procedures in False Arrest Claims: Insights from Jocks v. Tavernier

Reevaluating Probable Cause and Legal Procedures in False Arrest Claims: Insights from Jocks v. Tavernier

Date: Jan 9, 2003
Reevaluating Probable Cause and Legal Procedures in False Arrest Claims: Insights from Jocks v. Tavernier Introduction The case of Thomas Jocks v. Augusto Tavernier et al., adjudicated by the United...
Strict Liability and Third-Party Defense under CERCLA: Insights from Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Jones Chemical, Inc.

Strict Liability and Third-Party Defense under CERCLA: Insights from Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Jones Chemical, Inc.

Date: Jan 8, 2003
Strict Liability and Third-Party Defense under CERCLA: Insights from Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Jones Chemical, Inc. Introduction The case of Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) v. Jones...
Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Brock v. Wright Establishes Critical Precedents

Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Brock v. Wright Establishes Critical Precedents

Date: Jan 4, 2003
Deliberate Indifference in Inmate Medical Care: Brock v. Wright Establishes Critical Precedents Introduction Vincent A. Brock, an inmate at the Collins Correctional Facility in New York, filed a...
Heightened Showing Required for Excluding Family Members in Courtroom Closures: Insights from Sevencan v. Herbert

Heightened Showing Required for Excluding Family Members in Courtroom Closures: Insights from Sevencan v. Herbert

Date: Dec 31, 2002
Heightened Showing Required for Excluding Family Members in Courtroom Closures: Insights from Sevencan v. Herbert Introduction Sevencan v. Herbert is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Balancing Expert Testimony and Constitutional Protections: Comprehensive Review of United States v. Griffin and McGee

Balancing Expert Testimony and Constitutional Protections: Comprehensive Review of United States v. Griffin and McGee

Date: Dec 28, 2002
Balancing Expert Testimony and Constitutional Protections: Comprehensive Review of United States v. Griffin and McGee Introduction The appellate case United States of America v. Leon Dukagjini, Halit...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims: PepsiCo v. Coca-Cola

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims: PepsiCo v. Coca-Cola

Date: Dec 25, 2002
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Antitrust Claims: PepsiCo v. Coca-Cola Introduction In the landmark case PEPSICO, INC. v. The COCA-COLA COMPANY, decided on December 24, 2002, the United States...
Acquiescence and Laches in Trademark Disputes: Pro Fitness v. Pro-Fit

Acquiescence and Laches in Trademark Disputes: Pro Fitness v. Pro-Fit

Date: Dec 25, 2002
Acquiescence and Laches in Trademark Disputes: Pro Fitness v. Pro-Fit Introduction Pro Fitness Physical Therapy Center ("Pro Fitness" or plaintiff) initiated a legal dispute against Pro-Fit...
Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Stiles: Second Circuit Highlights Need for Factual Determination in Legal Malpractice Damages

Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Stiles: Second Circuit Highlights Need for Factual Determination in Legal Malpractice Damages

Date: Dec 25, 2002
Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Stiles: Second Circuit Highlights Need for Factual Determination in Legal Malpractice Damages Introduction The case of Ocean Ships, Inc. v. Thomas E. Stiles and Stiles Wright,...
Defining "Commercial Advertising or Promotion" Under the Lanham Act: Insights from Fashion Boutique v. Fendi USA

Defining "Commercial Advertising or Promotion" Under the Lanham Act: Insights from Fashion Boutique v. Fendi USA

Date: Dec 24, 2002
Defining "Commercial Advertising or Promotion" Under the Lanham Act: Insights from Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi USA, Inc. Introduction The case of Fashion Boutique of Short Hills,...
Second Circuit Affirms 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Coverage Denial for Gender Reassignment Surgeries

Second Circuit Affirms 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Coverage Denial for Gender Reassignment Surgeries

Date: Dec 21, 2002
Second Circuit Affirms 'Arbitrary and Capricious' Standard in ERISA Coverage Denial for Gender Reassignment Surgeries Introduction In Marc Andrew Mario v. P C Food Markets, Inc., 313 F.3d 758 (2d...
Defining Parental Standing Under IDEA and FERPA: Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education

Defining Parental Standing Under IDEA and FERPA: Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education

Date: Dec 21, 2002
Defining Parental Standing Under IDEA and FERPA: Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education Introduction The case of Pam Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education pertains to the intricate...
Protecting Debtor-Tenants in Public Housing: Second Circuit Establishes Primacy of Bankruptcy Code Section 525(a) Over Section 365

Protecting Debtor-Tenants in Public Housing: Second Circuit Establishes Primacy of Bankruptcy Code Section 525(a) Over Section 365

Date: Dec 21, 2002
Protecting Debtor-Tenants in Public Housing: Second Circuit Establishes Primacy of Bankruptcy Code Section 525(a) Over Section 365 Introduction The case of In re Laura Stoltz, Debtor-Appellee, v....
Affirmation of Conviction in Eyman: Clarifying Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Sentencing Enhancements

Affirmation of Conviction in Eyman: Clarifying Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Dec 19, 2002
Affirmation of Conviction in Eyman: Clarifying Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Sentencing Enhancements Introduction United States of America v. Dale Eyman, 313 F.3d 741 (2d Cir....
Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Independent State Grounds: Dunham v. Travis

Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Independent State Grounds: Dunham v. Travis

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Clarifying Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Independent State Grounds: Dunham v. Travis Introduction Craig Dunham v. Brion Travis, 313 F.3d 724, is a pivotal decision by the United States Court...
Expanded Scope of Adverse Employment Actions in Retaliation Claims: Treglia v. Town of Manlius

Expanded Scope of Adverse Employment Actions in Retaliation Claims: Treglia v. Town of Manlius

Date: Dec 17, 2002
Expanded Scope of Adverse Employment Actions in Retaliation Claims: Treglia v. Town of Manlius Introduction The case of Joseph V. Treglia v. Town of Manlius, 313 F.3d 713 (2002), adjudicated by the...
State Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Duty Claims under Diversity Jurisdiction: Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. Lutnick et al.

State Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Duty Claims under Diversity Jurisdiction: Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. Lutnick et al.

Date: Dec 17, 2002
State Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Duty Claims under Diversity Jurisdiction: Cantor Fitzgerald Inc. v. Lutnick et al. Introduction The case Cantor Fitzgerald Incorporated, a Nevada...
Expanding Eighth Amendment Protections: Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Deliberate Indifference in Davis v. State of New York

Expanding Eighth Amendment Protections: Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Deliberate Indifference in Davis v. State of New York

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Expanding Eighth Amendment Protections: Second-Hand Smoke Exposure and Deliberate Indifference in Davis v. State of New York Introduction Samuel Davis, an inmate at the Attica Correctional Facility...
Second Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of Federal Death Penalty Act: Rejection of Due Process Claims in Quinones v. United States

Second Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of Federal Death Penalty Act: Rejection of Due Process Claims in Quinones v. United States

Date: Dec 11, 2002
Second Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of Federal Death Penalty Act: Rejection of Due Process Claims in Quinones v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v....
Second Circuit Establishes Standards for Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: The Gregory Gayle Decision

Second Circuit Establishes Standards for Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: The Gregory Gayle Decision

Date: Dec 11, 2002
Second Circuit Establishes Standards for Retaliation Claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983: The Gregory Gayle Decision Introduction The case of Gregory Gayle v. P. Gonyea et al. (313 F.3d 677, 2d Cir. 2002)...
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Upholds Limitation on Attaching Foreign Sovereign Funds: Karaha Bodas Company v. Pertamina

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Upholds Limitation on Attaching Foreign Sovereign Funds: Karaha Bodas Company v. Pertamina

Date: Dec 11, 2002
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Upholds Limitation on Attaching Foreign Sovereign Funds: Karaha Bodas Company v. Pertamina Introduction The legal landscape of international arbitration...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert