Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett

Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett

Date: Feb 27, 2003
Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett Introduction Miguel Miranda v. Floyd Bennett is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on...
Cook v. New York State Board of Parole: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction and Statute of Limitations for State Prisoners

Cook v. New York State Board of Parole: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction and Statute of Limitations for State Prisoners

Date: Feb 26, 2003
Cook v. New York State Board of Parole: Clarifying Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction and Statute of Limitations for State Prisoners 1. Introduction In the landmark case of Alonzo Cook v. New York State...
Meaningful Attorney Involvement Required for Debt Collection Communications under FDCPA

Meaningful Attorney Involvement Required for Debt Collection Communications under FDCPA

Date: Feb 26, 2003
Meaningful Attorney Involvement Required for Debt Collection Communications under FDCPA Introduction Arthur Miller v. Wolpoff Abramson, L.L.P., Upton, Cohen Slamowitz, and National Attorney Network,...
Forfeiture of Punitive Damages Defense in Bifurcated Claims and Limitations of Automatic Bankruptcy Stay in Co-defendant Cases: Queenie, Ltd. v. Nygard International

Forfeiture of Punitive Damages Defense in Bifurcated Claims and Limitations of Automatic Bankruptcy Stay in Co-defendant Cases: Queenie, Ltd. v. Nygard International

Date: Feb 26, 2003
Forfeiture of Punitive Damages Defense in Bifurcated Claims and Limitations of Automatic Bankruptcy Stay in Co-defendant Cases: Queenie, Ltd. v. Nygard International Introduction The case of Queenie,...
Arbitration Agreement Enforceability and Signature Authenticity: Opals on Ice Lingerie v. Body Lines Inc.

Arbitration Agreement Enforceability and Signature Authenticity: Opals on Ice Lingerie v. Body Lines Inc.

Date: Feb 25, 2003
Arbitration Agreement Enforceability and Signature Authenticity: Opals on Ice Lingerie v. Body Lines Inc. Introduction The case of Opals on Ice Lingerie, Designs by Bernadette, Inc. v. Body Lines...
Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Fiduciary Duty Claims: Official Committee v. Coopers Lybrand

Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Fiduciary Duty Claims: Official Committee v. Coopers Lybrand

Date: Feb 21, 2003
Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Fiduciary Duty Claims: Official Committee v. Coopers Lybrand Introduction In the landmark case of Official Committee of the Unsecured Creditors of Color...
Federal Jurisdiction over Medal of Honor Presentation: Lunney v. United States

Federal Jurisdiction over Medal of Honor Presentation: Lunney v. United States

Date: Feb 14, 2003
Federal Jurisdiction over Medal of Honor Presentation: Lunney v. United States Introduction Lunney v. United States, 319 F.3d 550 (2d Cir. 2003), is a pivotal appellate court decision addressing the...
Eze v. Senkowski: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Eze v. Senkowski: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Feb 13, 2003
Eze v. Senkowski: Upholding AEDPA Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction Eze v. Senkowski (321 F.3d 110) is a landmark decision by the United...
Contemporaneous Ownership Requirement Affirmed in Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Contemporaneous Ownership Requirement Affirmed in Shareholder Derivative Litigation

Date: Feb 13, 2003
Contemporaneous Ownership Requirement Affirmed in Shareholder Derivative Litigation Introduction In the landmark case In re: Bank of New York Derivative Litigation, the United States Court of Appeals...
Expansion of Disability Protection under the Rehabilitation Act: Peters v. Baldwin Union Free School District

Expansion of Disability Protection under the Rehabilitation Act: Peters v. Baldwin Union Free School District

Date: Feb 13, 2003
Expansion of Disability Protection under the Rehabilitation Act: Peters v. Baldwin Union Free School District Introduction Peters v. Baldwin Union Free School District, 320 F.3d 164 (2d Cir. 2003),...
Clarifying ERISA-Based Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from Carlson v. Principal Financial Group

Clarifying ERISA-Based Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from Carlson v. Principal Financial Group

Date: Feb 13, 2003
Clarifying ERISA-Based Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Insights from Carlson v. Principal Financial Group Introduction In the landmark case of Mary W. Carlson v. Principal Financial Group, decided by...
Davis v. Goord: Enhanced Scrutiny on Prisoners' Retaliation Claims

Davis v. Goord: Enhanced Scrutiny on Prisoners' Retaliation Claims

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Davis v. Goord: Enhanced Scrutiny on Prisoners' Retaliation Claims Introduction Davis v. Goord, 320 F.3d 346 (2d Cir. 2003), is a significant appellate decision addressing the complexities...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Over CAT Claims Under FARRA: Mu-Xing WANG v. INS

Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Over CAT Claims Under FARRA: Mu-Xing WANG v. INS

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Over CAT Claims Under FARRA: Mu-Xing WANG v. INS Introduction Mu-Xing WANG v. INS is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Remand for Discovery in Habeas Corpus Petition: Drake v. Portuondo

Remand for Discovery in Habeas Corpus Petition: Drake v. Portuondo

Date: Feb 1, 2003
Remand for Discovery in Habeas Corpus Petition: Drake v. Portuondo Introduction Robie J. Drake appealed a judgment from the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, which...
Affirming the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Federal Attempt Crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Crowley

Affirming the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Federal Attempt Crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Crowley

Date: Feb 1, 2003
Affirming the 'Substantial Step' Standard in Federal Attempt Crimes under 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Crowley Introduction United States of America v. Francis...
Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: LC Capital Partners v. Frontier Insurance Group

Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: LC Capital Partners v. Frontier Insurance Group

Date: Jan 29, 2003
Inquiry Notice and Statute of Limitations in Securities Fraud: LC Capital Partners v. Frontier Insurance Group Introduction The appellate case of LC Capital Partners, LP v. Frontier Insurance Group,...
Affirmation of Securities Regulation Standards in DeMaria v. Andersen

Affirmation of Securities Regulation Standards in DeMaria v. Andersen

Date: Jan 29, 2003
Affirmation of Securities Regulation Standards in DeMaria v. Andersen Introduction DeMaria v. Andersen is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on...
United States Lines v. Asbestosis Claimants: Enforcing Statute of Limitations and the Necessity of Diligent Claim Documentation in Bankruptcy Proceedings

United States Lines v. Asbestosis Claimants: Enforcing Statute of Limitations and the Necessity of Diligent Claim Documentation in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Jan 29, 2003
United States Lines v. Asbestosis Claimants: Enforcing Statute of Limitations and the Necessity of Diligent Claim Documentation in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of United States Lines,...
Second Circuit Affirms Deference to ERISA Plan Administrators in Benefit Denial Based on Policy Interpretation

Second Circuit Affirms Deference to ERISA Plan Administrators in Benefit Denial Based on Policy Interpretation

Date: Jan 28, 2003
Second Circuit Affirms Deference to ERISA Plan Administrators in Benefit Denial Based on Policy Interpretation Introduction In the case of Anthony Celardo v. GNY Automobile Dealers Health Welfare...
Second Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for § 1915A Dismissals in Prisoner Civil Actions: Larkin v. Savage

Second Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for § 1915A Dismissals in Prisoner Civil Actions: Larkin v. Savage

Date: Jan 24, 2003
Second Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for § 1915A Dismissals in Prisoner Civil Actions: Larkin v. Savage Introduction The case of John Stephen Larkin v. Patrick Savage et al. (318 F.3d 138)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert