Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Simmonds v. INS: Establishing Ripeness Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for State Prisoners with Final Removal Orders

Simmonds v. INS: Establishing Ripeness Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for State Prisoners with Final Removal Orders

Date: Apr 22, 2003
Simmonds v. INS: Establishing Ripeness Standards in Habeas Corpus Petitions for State Prisoners with Final Removal Orders Introduction In Anthony Simmonds v. Immigration and Naturalization Service...
Enhanced Standards for Corroborative Evidence in Asylum Claims: Qiu v. Ashcroft

Enhanced Standards for Corroborative Evidence in Asylum Claims: Qiu v. Ashcroft

Date: Apr 17, 2003
Enhanced Standards for Corroborative Evidence in Asylum Claims: Qin Shui Qiu v. Ashcroft Introduction The case of Jin Shui Qiu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General (329 F.3d 140) adjudicated by the...
Mack v. Otis Elevator Co.: Expanding the Definition of Supervisor for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Mack v. Otis Elevator Co.: Expanding the Definition of Supervisor for Hostile Work Environment Claims

Date: Apr 12, 2003
Mack v. Otis Elevator Co.: Expanding the Definition of Supervisor for Hostile Work Environment Claims Introduction MACK v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY and Local 1 International Union of Elevator...
McKinney v. Artuz: Affirming Deference to Trial Courts in Batson Analysis Under Habeas Corpus

McKinney v. Artuz: Affirming Deference to Trial Courts in Batson Analysis Under Habeas Corpus

Date: Apr 10, 2003
McKinney v. Artuz: Affirming Deference to Trial Courts in Batson Analysis Under Habeas Corpus Introduction In the landmark case Billy McKinney v. Christopher Artuz, the United States Court of Appeals...
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Terrorism Cases: Analysis of United States v. Yousef et al.

Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Terrorism Cases: Analysis of United States v. Yousef et al.

Date: Apr 5, 2003
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in Terrorism Cases: Analysis of United States v. Yousef et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, Eyad Ismoil, Abdul Hakim Murad,...
Assessing Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Insights from United States v. Perez

Assessing Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Insights from United States v. Perez

Date: Apr 5, 2003
Assessing Conflicts of Interest in Legal Representation: Insights from United States v. Perez Introduction In United States of America v. Guillermo Aliro Perez, 325 F.3d 115 (2d Cir. 2003), the...
Res Judicata and Claim Preclusion in Federal Court: AmBase Corp. v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust

Res Judicata and Claim Preclusion in Federal Court: AmBase Corp. v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust

Date: Apr 4, 2003
Res Judicata and Claim Preclusion in Federal Court: AmBase Corp. v. City Investing Co. Liquidating Trust 1. Introduction The case of AmBase Corporation v. City Investing Company Liquidating Trust...
Affirmation of Single Publication Rule for Internet Content and Defamation Threshold in Van Buskirk v. New York Times Co.

Affirmation of Single Publication Rule for Internet Content and Defamation Threshold in Van Buskirk v. New York Times Co.

Date: Apr 3, 2003
Affirmation of Single Publication Rule for Internet Content and Defamation Threshold in Van Buskirk v. The New York Times Co. Introduction The case of Robert Van Buskirk v. The New York Times Co.,...
Causal Link Requirement Strengthened in ADA Workplace Accommodation: Felix v. NYCTA

Causal Link Requirement Strengthened in ADA Workplace Accommodation: Felix v. NYCTA

Date: Apr 1, 2003
Causal Link Requirement Strengthened in ADA Workplace Accommodation: Felix v. NYCTA Introduction Denise Felix, represented by Naomi Felix and Irene Cooper as administrators of her estate, brought a...
Enhanced Due Process Standards for Reopening SSI Applications: Insights from Byam v. Barnhart

Enhanced Due Process Standards for Reopening SSI Applications: Insights from Byam v. Barnhart

Date: Apr 1, 2003
Enhanced Due Process Standards for Reopening SSI Applications: Insights from Byam v. Barnhart Introduction In Jean D. Byam v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, the...
Second Circuit Explores Exhaustion Requirements and the 'Total Exhaustion' Debate under the Prison Litigation Reform Act in Ortiz v. McBride

Second Circuit Explores Exhaustion Requirements and the 'Total Exhaustion' Debate under the Prison Litigation Reform Act in Ortiz v. McBride

Date: Mar 22, 2003
Second Circuit Explores Exhaustion Requirements and the 'Total Exhaustion' Debate under the Prison Litigation Reform Act in Ortiz v. McBride Introduction Jose Ortiz v. D. McBride, Sgt. R.O. Mara,...
Assessing Mental Capacity of Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Ferrelli v. River Manor Health Care Center

Assessing Mental Capacity of Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Ferrelli v. River Manor Health Care Center

Date: Mar 22, 2003
Assessing Mental Capacity of Pro Se Litigants: Insights from Ferrelli v. River Manor Health Care Center Introduction The case Isabella Ferrelli v. River Manor Health Care Center (323 F.3d 196) serves...
Harhay v. Town of Ellington: Defining Boundaries of Legislative and Qualified Immunity in Employment Reappointment

Harhay v. Town of Ellington: Defining Boundaries of Legislative and Qualified Immunity in Employment Reappointment

Date: Mar 22, 2003
Harhay v. Town of Ellington: Defining Boundaries of Legislative and Qualified Immunity in Employment Reappointment Introduction The case of Anne E. Harhay v. Town of Ellington Board of Education...
Establishing Subjective Bad Faith Standard for Sua Sponte Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from In re PENNIE EDMONDS LLP

Establishing Subjective Bad Faith Standard for Sua Sponte Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from In re PENNIE EDMONDS LLP

Date: Mar 15, 2003
Establishing Subjective Bad Faith Standard for Sua Sponte Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from In re PENNIE EDMONDS LLP Introduction The case of In re PENNIE EDMONDS LLP (323 F.3d 86) adjudicated by the...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Supported Assertions in Summary Judgment: Giannullo v. City of New York

Reaffirming the Necessity of Supported Assertions in Summary Judgment: Giannullo v. City of New York

Date: Mar 11, 2003
Reaffirming the Necessity of Supported Assertions in Summary Judgment: Giannullo v. City of New York Introduction The case of Mark Giannullo v. City of New York, decided by the United States Court of...
Arbitrability of Contractual Claims Under ICC Rules: Shaw Group Inc. v. Triplefine Int'l Corp. Establishes Key Precedent

Arbitrability of Contractual Claims Under ICC Rules: Shaw Group Inc. v. Triplefine Int'l Corp. Establishes Key Precedent

Date: Mar 5, 2003
Arbitrability of Contractual Claims Under ICC Rules: Shaw Group Inc. v. Triplefine Int'l Corp. Establishes Key Precedent Introduction Shaw Group Inc., Stone Webster, Inc., and Stone Webster Asia,...
Intentional Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations: Scutti Enterprises v. Park Place Entertainment

Intentional Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations: Scutti Enterprises v. Park Place Entertainment

Date: Mar 1, 2003
Intentional Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations: Scutti Enterprises v. Park Place Entertainment Introduction The case of Scutti Enterprises, LLC v. Park Place Entertainment...
Second Circuit Affirms EPA’s Discretion Under CAA Title V for NOD Issuance but Mandates Objections to Non-Compliant Draft Permits

Second Circuit Affirms EPA’s Discretion Under CAA Title V for NOD Issuance but Mandates Objections to Non-Compliant Draft Permits

Date: Feb 28, 2003
Second Circuit Affirms EPA’s Discretion Under CAA Title V for NOD Issuance but Mandates Objections to Non-Compliant Draft Permits Introduction In the landmark case of New York Public Interest...
Concurrent Supervised Release Terms: Affirmation of Separate Obligations in Gammarano v. United States

Concurrent Supervised Release Terms: Affirmation of Separate Obligations in Gammarano v. United States

Date: Feb 27, 2003
Concurrent Supervised Release Terms: Affirmation of Separate Obligations in Gammarano v. United States Introduction Gammarano v. United States, 321 F.3d 311 (2d Cir. 2003), is a pivotal appellate...
Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett

Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett

Date: Feb 27, 2003
Clarity in Grounds for Denial Under AEDPA: Miranda v. Bennett Introduction Miguel Miranda v. Floyd Bennett is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert