Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarification on Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Immunity for Administrative Screening Committees: Mitchell v. Har

Clarification on Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Immunity for Administrative Screening Committees: Mitchell v. Har

Date: Aug 4, 2004
Clarification on Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Immunity for Administrative Screening Committees: Mitchell v. Har Introduction Stephen T. Mitchell v. Har (377 F.3d 157, 2d Cir. 2004) is a pivotal case...
Preservation of Judicial Records’ Confidentiality Post-Settlement: Analysis of Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG

Preservation of Judicial Records’ Confidentiality Post-Settlement: Analysis of Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG

Date: Aug 3, 2004
Preservation of Judicial Records’ Confidentiality Post-Settlement: Analysis of Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG Introduction The case Virginia Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004),...
Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge: Enhancing Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings

Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge: Enhancing Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Aug 3, 2004
Reena Raggi, Circuit Judge: Enhancing Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Proceedings Introduction In the case of Rubin Sira v. R. Morton, C. Artuz, D. Selsky, and G. Goord, the United States Court of...
Strengthening Confrontation Rights: The Impact of CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON on Money Laundering Convictions

Strengthening Confrontation Rights: The Impact of CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON on Money Laundering Convictions

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Strengthening Confrontation Rights: The Impact of CRAWFORD v. WASHINGTON on Money Laundering Convictions Introduction The case of United States of America v. Robert Martins and Antonio Guastella (377...
Admissibility of Non-Testimonial Co-Conspirator Statements Under the Confrontation Clause: Insights from United States v. Saget

Admissibility of Non-Testimonial Co-Conspirator Statements Under the Confrontation Clause: Insights from United States v. Saget

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Admissibility of Non-Testimonial Co-Conspirator Statements Under the Confrontation Clause: Insights from United States v. Saget Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. James Saget, 377...
Affirmation of §2314: Inducing Travel of an Agent in Interstate Fraud

Affirmation of §2314: Inducing Travel of an Agent in Interstate Fraud

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Affirmation of §2314: Inducing Travel of an Agent in Interstate Fraud 1. Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Wade Thomas presents a pivotal examination of the application of 18...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Vargas v. City of New York

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Vargas v. City of New York

Date: Jul 28, 2004
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Clarified in Vargas v. City of New York Introduction Robert Vargas v. The City of New York and The New York City Police Department is a seminal case decided by the United...
Constructive Trusts and Contractual Agreements: Upholding Written Tax Allocations in Bankruptcy

Constructive Trusts and Contractual Agreements: Upholding Written Tax Allocations in Bankruptcy

Date: Jul 28, 2004
Constructive Trusts and Contractual Agreements: Upholding Written Tax Allocations in Bankruptcy Introduction The legal landscape surrounding bankruptcy and equitable remedies often presents complex...
Disclosure of Anonymity in P2P Copyright Infringement: Sony Music v. Doe Defendants

Disclosure of Anonymity in P2P Copyright Infringement: Sony Music v. Doe Defendants

Date: Jul 27, 2004
Disclosure of Anonymity in P2P Copyright Infringement: Sony Music v. Doe Defendants Introduction In Sony Music Entertainment Inc. et al. v. Doe Defendants (326 F. Supp. 2d 556, S.D. N.Y., 2004),...
Second Circuit Establishes Final SSA Rules Primacy in Judicial Review of Childhood Disability Claims

Second Circuit Establishes Final SSA Rules Primacy in Judicial Review of Childhood Disability Claims

Date: Jul 24, 2004
Second Circuit Establishes Final SSA Rules Primacy in Judicial Review of Childhood Disability Claims Introduction In the case of Detra Pollard v. William Halter, Commissioner of Social Security, the...
Affirming Discretion Under 28 U.S.C. §1782 in International Litigation Assistance

Affirming Discretion Under 28 U.S.C. §1782 in International Litigation Assistance

Date: Jul 21, 2004
Affirming Discretion Under 28 U.S.C. §1782 in International Litigation Assistance Introduction In the landmark case of Schmitz et al. v. Bernstein Liebhard Lifshitz, LLP, Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Deportation Proceedings: Foster v. INS

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Deportation Proceedings: Foster v. INS

Date: Jul 17, 2004
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Deportation Proceedings: Foster v. INS Introduction Foster v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), 376 F.3d 75 (2d Cir....
Clarifying Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Fundamental Fairness in Deportation Proceedings: United States v. Copeland

Clarifying Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Fundamental Fairness in Deportation Proceedings: United States v. Copeland

Date: Jul 17, 2004
Clarifying Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Fundamental Fairness in Deportation Proceedings: United States v. Copeland Introduction In United States of America v. Richard Copeland, 376 F.3d...
Patterson v. Oneida County: Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Claims under §§1981 and §1983

Patterson v. Oneida County: Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Claims under §§1981 and §1983

Date: Jul 16, 2004
Patterson v. Oneida County: Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Claims under §§1981 and §1983 Introduction In the case of Michael Antonio Patterson v. County of Oneida, the United States Court of...
Balancing Delay and Fairness: Involuntary Dismissal in False Claims Act Litigation

Balancing Delay and Fairness: Involuntary Dismissal in False Claims Act Litigation

Date: Jul 15, 2004
Balancing Delay and Fairness: Involuntary Dismissal in False Claims Act Litigation Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America, ex rel., Walter M. Drake v. Norden Systems, Inc., and United...
FDIC's Authority to Collect Post-Insolvency Interest Upheld in Golden Pacific Bancorp v. FDIC

FDIC's Authority to Collect Post-Insolvency Interest Upheld in Golden Pacific Bancorp v. FDIC

Date: Jul 15, 2004
FDIC's Authority to Collect Post-Insolvency Interest Upheld in Golden Pacific Bancorp v. FDIC Introduction Golden Pacific Bancorp v. FDIC is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Minimal Creativity in Copyright for Online Product Descriptions: MyWebGrocer v. Hometown Info

Minimal Creativity in Copyright for Online Product Descriptions: MyWebGrocer v. Hometown Info

Date: Jul 14, 2004
Minimal Creativity in Copyright for Online Product Descriptions: MyWebGrocer, LLC v. Hometown Info, Inc. Introduction The legal landscape surrounding copyright protection for factual compilations,...
Ambiguity in Credit Default Swap Contracts and Restructuring Credit Events: Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.

Ambiguity in Credit Default Swap Contracts and Restructuring Credit Events: Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.

Date: Jul 10, 2004
Ambiguity in Credit Default Swap Contracts and Restructuring Credit Events Eternity Global Master Fund Ltd. v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co., 375 F.3d 168 (2d Cir. 2004) Introduction In the landmark case...
Second Circuit Establishes 'Regularity' Standard for Debt Collectors under FDCPA

Second Circuit Establishes 'Regularity' Standard for Debt Collectors under FDCPA

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Second Circuit Establishes 'Regularity' Standard for Debt Collectors under FDCPA Introduction In Sarah GOLDSTEIN v. HUTTON, Ingram, Yuzek, Gainen, Carroll Bertolotti, the United States Court of...
No Automatic Summary Judgment in Unopposed Motions: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule Under Fed.R.C.P. 56

No Automatic Summary Judgment in Unopposed Motions: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule Under Fed.R.C.P. 56

Date: Jul 2, 2004
No Automatic Summary Judgment in Unopposed Motions: Second Circuit Clarifies Rule Under Fed.R.C.P. 56 Introduction The case of Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. v. 1-800 Beargram Company vs. Robert M....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert