Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Kamagate v. Ashcroft: Defining Aggravated Felonies in Immigration Law

Kamagate v. Ashcroft: Defining Aggravated Felonies in Immigration Law

Date: Sep 22, 2004
Kamagate v. Ashcroft: Defining Aggravated Felonies in Immigration Law Introduction Karamokotie Kamagate, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, was convicted in 1998 for conspiracy to...
Second Circuit Affirms HUD’s Prohibition on Mark-Ups under RESPA §8(b)

Second Circuit Affirms HUD’s Prohibition on Mark-Ups under RESPA §8(b)

Date: Sep 11, 2004
Second Circuit Affirms HUD’s Prohibition on Mark-Ups under RESPA §8(b) Introduction In the appellate case Kruse et al. v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Qualified Immunity Under the "Stigma Plus" Doctrine: Insights from El v. ra Sadallah

Qualified Immunity Under the "Stigma Plus" Doctrine: Insights from El v. ra Sadallah

Date: Sep 4, 2004
Qualified Immunity Under the "Stigma Plus" Doctrine: Insights from El v. ra Sadallah Introduction The case of Elvera Sadallah and Valley View Country Club, Inc. v. City of Utica and Edward Hanna,...
Voluntary Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in McMahon v. Hodges

Voluntary Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in McMahon v. Hodges

Date: Sep 1, 2004
Voluntary Waiver of Jury Trial Rights in McMahon v. Hodges Introduction McMahon v. Hodges, 382 F.3d 284 (2d Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Limits on Altering Verdicts and Juror Affidavits in Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Limits on Altering Verdicts and Juror Affidavits in Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Date: Aug 25, 2004
Limits on Altering Verdicts and Juror Affidavits in Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority Introduction Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Conflict of Interest and Attorney Disqualification in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Jones

Conflict of Interest and Attorney Disqualification in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Jones

Date: Aug 24, 2004
Conflict of Interest and Attorney Disqualification in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases: Analysis of United States v. Jones Introduction United States of America v. Lance Jones and Lonnie Jones is a pivotal...
Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Lawrence Johnson v. Testman and James

Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Lawrence Johnson v. Testman and James

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Exhaustion Requirements under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Insights from Lawrence Johnson v. Testman and James Introduction The case of Lawrence Johnson v. Ronald Testman, Lonnie James,...
Estoppel and Special Circumstances in Compliance with PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Insights from Hemphill v. State of New York

Estoppel and Special Circumstances in Compliance with PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Insights from Hemphill v. State of New York

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Estoppel and Special Circumstances in Compliance with PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Insights from Hemphill v. State of New York Introduction In the landmark case of John Hemphill v. State of New...
Partial Exhaustion Doctrine Established under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: ORTIZ v. McBRIDE

Partial Exhaustion Doctrine Established under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: ORTIZ v. McBRIDE

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Partial Exhaustion Doctrine Established under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: ORTIZ v. McBRIDE Introduction ORTIZ v. McBRIDE, 380 F.3d 649 (2d Cir. 2004), is a landmark decision by the United...
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Drug Conspiracy Case: United States v. Alfonso

Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Drug Conspiracy Case: United States v. Alfonso

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Drug Conspiracy Case: United States v. Alfonso Introduction The case of United States of America v. Elbio Espaillet, Martin Calderon, and Gerald Alfonso presents a...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: The Abney v. McGinnis Decision

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: The Abney v. McGinnis Decision

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Prison Litigation: The Abney v. McGinnis Decision Introduction Horace Abney v. McGinnis et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Exhaustion Requirements Under the PLRA for Retaliation Claims: Insights from GIANO v. GOORD

Exhaustion Requirements Under the PLRA for Retaliation Claims: Insights from GIANO v. GOORD

Date: Aug 19, 2004
Exhaustion Requirements Under the PLRA for Retaliation Claims: Insights from GIANO v. GOORD Introduction GIANO v. GOORD, 380 F.3d 670 (2d Cir. 2004), represents a pivotal case in the interpretation...
Causation in Jones Act Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Rejects The Pennsylvania Rule

Causation in Jones Act Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Rejects The Pennsylvania Rule

Date: Aug 12, 2004
Causation in Jones Act Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment and Rejects The Pennsylvania Rule Introduction The legal landscape surrounding personal injury claims under the Jones Act has...
Second Circuit Affirms Breach of Duty of Fair Representation Against IAM for Discriminatory Seniority Practices

Second Circuit Affirms Breach of Duty of Fair Representation Against IAM for Discriminatory Seniority Practices

Date: Aug 11, 2004
Second Circuit Affirms Breach of Duty of Fair Representation Against IAM for Discriminatory Seniority Practices Introduction The case of Ramey et al. v. International Association of Machinists and...
Non-Frivolous Meritless Claims Do Not Entitle to Attorneys' Fees Under §1988

Non-Frivolous Meritless Claims Do Not Entitle to Attorneys' Fees Under §1988

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Non-Frivolous Meritless Claims Do Not Entitle to Attorneys' Fees Under §1988 Introduction The case of Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife, Inc. (378...
Reversal of Exclusion for Intentionally Self-Inflicted Injuries in Accidental Death Insurance Claims: Critchlow v. First Unum Life Insurance

Reversal of Exclusion for Intentionally Self-Inflicted Injuries in Accidental Death Insurance Claims: Critchlow v. First Unum Life Insurance

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Reversal of Exclusion for Intentionally Self-Inflicted Injuries in Accidental Death Insurance Claims: Critchlow v. First Unum Life Insurance Introduction The case of Shirley M. Critchlow v. First...
Second Circuit Reaffirms High Deference to Arbitral Awards in Control Person Liability Cases

Second Circuit Reaffirms High Deference to Arbitral Awards in Control Person Liability Cases

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Second Circuit Reaffirms High Deference to Arbitral Awards in Control Person Liability Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Wallace, Jacaruso, and Scotti v. Buttar and Winston, decided on...
Inclusion of State Larceny in INA's Aggravated Felony: Insights from ABIMBOLA v. ASHCROFT

Inclusion of State Larceny in INA's Aggravated Felony: Insights from ABIMBOLA v. ASHCROFT

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Inclusion of State Larceny in INA's Aggravated Felony: Insights from ABIMBOLA v. ASHCROFT Introduction The case of ABIMBOLA v. ASHCROFT, decided on August 5, 2004, by the United States Court of...
Continuing Conduct and Venue in 18 U.S.C. § 894 Crimes: An Analysis of United States v. Chen and Sun

Continuing Conduct and Venue in 18 U.S.C. § 894 Crimes: An Analysis of United States v. Chen and Sun

Date: Aug 6, 2004
Continuing Conduct and Venue in 18 U.S.C. § 894 Crimes: An Analysis of United States v. Chen and Sun Introduction In United States of America v. Steven Chen and Gong Chai Sun, 378 F.3d 151 (2d Cir....
Nonpublic Fora Designation for Welfare Office Waiting Rooms: Implications for Advocacy Access

Nonpublic Fora Designation for Welfare Office Waiting Rooms: Implications for Advocacy Access

Date: Aug 5, 2004
Nonpublic Fora Designation for Welfare Office Waiting Rooms: Implications for Advocacy Access Comprehensive Commentary on Make the Road by Walking, Inc. v. Turner, Second Circuit, 378 F.3d 133 (2004)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert