Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming the Automobile Exception: Analysis of United States v. Eric Gagnon (2d Cir. 2004)

Reaffirming the Automobile Exception: Analysis of United States v. Eric Gagnon (2d Cir. 2004)

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Reaffirming the Automobile Exception: Analysis of United States v. Eric Gagnon (2d Cir. 2004) Introduction United States of America v. Eric Gagnon, 373 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 2004), is a pivotal case...
Second Circuit Establishes Exception to Administrative Exhaustion in Immigration Deportation Cases

Second Circuit Establishes Exception to Administrative Exhaustion in Immigration Deportation Cases

Date: Jul 2, 2004
Second Circuit Establishes Exception to Administrative Exhaustion in Immigration Deportation Cases Introduction Ramon Antonio Marrero Pichardo v. John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney General, et al. is a...
Judicial Discretion in Rule 11 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Denial in Perez v. Sachem Quality of Life

Judicial Discretion in Rule 11 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Denial in Perez v. Sachem Quality of Life

Date: Jun 29, 2004
Judicial Discretion in Rule 11 Sanctions: Second Circuit Affirms Denial in Perez v. Sachem Quality of Life Introduction The case of Israel Perez and Magdaleno Estrada Escamilla v. Sachem Quality of...
KERMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK: Expanding Accountability and Clarifying Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Cases

KERMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK: Expanding Accountability and Clarifying Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Cases

Date: Jun 29, 2004
KERMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK: Expanding Accountability and Clarifying Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Cases Introduction In KERMAN v. CITY OF NEW YORK, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirming Limits of §1983 Claims in Civil Administrative Proceedings: Washington v. Rockland County

Affirming Limits of §1983 Claims in Civil Administrative Proceedings: Washington v. Rockland County

Date: Jun 26, 2004
Affirming Limits of §1983 Claims in Civil Administrative Proceedings: Washington v. Rockland County Introduction In the landmark case of Washington v. Rockland County, the United States Court of...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Applied to Copyright Claims in Briarpatch Limited v. Phoenix Pictures

Complete Preemption Doctrine Applied to Copyright Claims in Briarpatch Limited v. Phoenix Pictures

Date: Jun 26, 2004
Complete Preemption Doctrine Applied to Copyright Claims in Briarpatch Limited v. Phoenix Pictures Introduction Briarpatch Limited, L.P. v. Phoenix Pictures, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the...
Second Circuit Clarifies Probable Cause and Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: Carriere v. Rothstein

Second Circuit Clarifies Probable Cause and Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: Carriere v. Rothstein

Date: Jun 25, 2004
Second Circuit Clarifies Probable Cause and Favorable Termination in Malicious Prosecution: Carriere v. Rothstein Introduction In Carriere v. Rothstein, 373 F.3d 275 (2d Cir. 2004), the United States...
Remand for Adequate Consideration of Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Sutherland v. Barnhart

Remand for Adequate Consideration of Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Sutherland v. Barnhart

Date: Jun 24, 2004
Remand for Adequate Consideration of Medical Evidence in Disability Claims: Sutherland v. Barnhart Introduction In the case of BLOSSOM SUTHERLAND v. JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of Social...
Controlled Substance Analogue Clarified and Multiplicity in Conspiracy Charges Addressed: Ansaldi v. USA

Controlled Substance Analogue Clarified and Multiplicity in Conspiracy Charges Addressed: Ansaldi v. USA

Date: Jun 17, 2004
Controlled Substance Analogue Clarified and Multiplicity in Conspiracy Charges Addressed: Ansaldi v. USA Introduction United States of America v. Scott Ansaldi and Rodney Dean Gates, 372 F.3d 118 (2d...
Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petitions under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Adams v. United States

Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petitions under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Adams v. United States

Date: Jun 17, 2004
Clarifying Habeas Corpus Petitions under 28 U.S.C. §2241: Insights from Adams v. United States Introduction In the realm of federal habeas corpus petitions, the distinction between 28 U.S.C. §2241...
Second Circuit Upholds Default Judgment: Strict Standards for Vacating Defaults under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

Second Circuit Upholds Default Judgment: Strict Standards for Vacating Defaults under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

Date: Jun 16, 2004
Second Circuit Upholds Default Judgment: Strict Standards for Vacating Defaults under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) Introduction The case of State Street Bank and Trust Company v. Inversiones Errazuriz...
Second Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment on Hostile Work Environment Claims in Dawson v. County of Westchester

Second Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment on Hostile Work Environment Claims in Dawson v. County of Westchester

Date: Jun 15, 2004
Second Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment on Hostile Work Environment Claims in Dawson v. County of Westchester Introduction The case of Dawson et al. v. County of Westchester involves a group of...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Parole Officers in Warrantless Search Based on Mistaken Information

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Parole Officers in Warrantless Search Based on Mistaken Information

Date: Jun 11, 2004
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Parole Officers in Warrantless Search Based on Mistaken Information Introduction The case of Yvonne Moore v. Angela Vega and Alex Lavinio presents a significant...
Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. D'Urso: Establishing the Primacy of Contractual Post-Judgment Interest Rates Over Statutory Rates

Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. D'Urso: Establishing the Primacy of Contractual Post-Judgment Interest Rates Over Statutory Rates

Date: Jun 9, 2004
Westinghouse Credit Corporation v. D'Urso: Establishing the Primacy of Contractual Post-Judgment Interest Rates Over Statutory Rates Introduction In the landmark case of Westinghouse Credit...
Establishing the First Amendment Right to Access Docket Sheets: The HARTFORD COURANT CO. v. PELLEGRINO

Establishing the First Amendment Right to Access Docket Sheets: The HARTFORD COURANT CO. v. PELLEGRINO

Date: Jun 9, 2004
Establishing the First Amendment Right to Access Docket Sheets: The HARTFORD COURANT CO. v. PELLEGRINO Introduction In The Hartford Courant Company v. Pellegrino, the United States Court of Appeals...
Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: Overton v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs

Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: Overton v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs

Date: Jun 4, 2004
Feres Doctrine Reaffirmed: Overton v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs Introduction In the landmark case of William Overton v. New York State Division of Military and Naval...
Quantum Meruit Entitlement for Discharged Counsel Independent of Client Recovery: Analysis of Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino Schwartz, P.C.

Quantum Meruit Entitlement for Discharged Counsel Independent of Client Recovery: Analysis of Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino Schwartz, P.C.

Date: Jun 3, 2004
Quantum Meruit Entitlement for Discharged Counsel Independent of Client Recovery Introduction The case Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, Dipak Nandi,...
Stigma-Plus Claims and Due Process: Insights from Patterson v. City of Utica

Stigma-Plus Claims and Due Process: Insights from Patterson v. City of Utica

Date: Jun 3, 2004
Stigma-Plus Claims and Due Process: Insights from Patterson v. City of Utica Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen Patterson v. City of Utica, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Authentication of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Admissibility Standards: Insights from United States v. Tin Yat Chin

Authentication of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Admissibility Standards: Insights from United States v. Tin Yat Chin

Date: Jun 3, 2004
Authentication of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Admissibility Standards: Insights from United States v. Tin Yat Chin Introduction The case of United States of America v. Tin Yat Chin, adjudicated by the...
Affirming Involuntary Consent and Fourth Amendment Protections: Analysis of United States v. Romanus Isiofia

Affirming Involuntary Consent and Fourth Amendment Protections: Analysis of United States v. Romanus Isiofia

Date: Jun 2, 2004
Affirming Involuntary Consent and Fourth Amendment Protections: Analysis of United States v. Romanus Isiofia Introduction The case of United States v. Romanus Isiofia, decided by the United States...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert