Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stops and Pat-Downs: Insights from HOLEMAN v. CITY OF NEW LONDON

Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stops and Pat-Downs: Insights from HOLEMAN v. CITY OF NEW LONDON

Date: Oct 1, 2005
Qualified Immunity in Traffic Stops and Pat-Downs: Insights from HOLEMAN v. CITY OF NEW LONDON Introduction The case of Marion Holeman and Wallace Holeman, Administratrixes of the Estate of Darrel...
Aggregation of Employees Under Title VII: Insights from Arculeo v. On-Site Sales Marketing, LLC

Aggregation of Employees Under Title VII: Insights from Arculeo v. On-Site Sales Marketing, LLC

Date: Oct 1, 2005
Aggregation of Employees Under Title VII: Insights from Arculeo v. On-Site Sales Marketing, LLC Introduction In the landmark case of Jennifer Arculeo v. On-Site Sales Marketing, LLC and Sanford...
Grand River Enterprises v. Defendants: Second Circuit Affirms Rule 54(b) Certification and Upholds Personal Jurisdiction in Antitrust Challenge

Grand River Enterprises v. Defendants: Second Circuit Affirms Rule 54(b) Certification and Upholds Personal Jurisdiction in Antitrust Challenge

Date: Sep 29, 2005
Grand River Enterprises v. Defendants: Second Circuit Affirms Rule 54(b) Certification and Upholds Personal Jurisdiction in Antitrust Challenge 1. Introduction Grand River Enterprises Six Nations,...
Affirmation of Administrative Deference in IDEA Cases: Cerra v. Pawling Central School District

Affirmation of Administrative Deference in IDEA Cases: Cerra v. Pawling Central School District

Date: Sep 29, 2005
Affirmation of Administrative Deference in IDEA Cases: Cerra v. Pawling Central School District Introduction Cerra v. Pawling Central School District is a significant appellate court decision from...
SEC v. Kern et al.: Reinforcing Securities Registration Compliance and Penalty Enforcement

SEC v. Kern et al.: Reinforcing Securities Registration Compliance and Penalty Enforcement

Date: Sep 28, 2005
SEC v. Kern et al.: Reinforcing Securities Registration Compliance and Penalty Enforcement Introduction The case of SEC v. Richard S. Kern, Donald R. Kern, Charles Wilkins, and related entities (425...
Balancing Supervised Release Conditions with Parental Due Process Rights: Insights from United States v. Myers

Balancing Supervised Release Conditions with Parental Due Process Rights: Insights from United States v. Myers

Date: Sep 28, 2005
Balancing Supervised Release Conditions with Parental Due Process Rights: Insights from United States v. Myers Introduction The case of United States v. Duane Arthur Myers, 426 F.3d 117 (2d Cir....
Chen v. United States Department of Justice: Enhanced Standards for Asylum Eligibility under Coercive Population Control Policies

Chen v. United States Department of Justice: Enhanced Standards for Asylum Eligibility under Coercive Population Control Policies

Date: Sep 24, 2005
Chen v. United States Department of Justice: Enhanced Standards for Asylum Eligibility under Coercive Population Control Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Chen v. United States Department...
Amendment of Complaints for Attorney's Fees Under Title VII: Insights from Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System

Amendment of Complaints for Attorney's Fees Under Title VII: Insights from Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System

Date: Sep 24, 2005
Amendment of Complaints for Attorney's Fees Under Title VII: Insights from Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation System Introduction The case of Carol Aurecchione v. Schoolman Transportation...
Exclusive Distribution Rights and Third-Party Beneficiary Doctrine in Subaru Distributors Corp. v. Subaru of America, Inc.

Exclusive Distribution Rights and Third-Party Beneficiary Doctrine in Subaru Distributors Corp. v. Subaru of America, Inc.

Date: Sep 22, 2005
Exclusive Distribution Rights and Third-Party Beneficiary Doctrine in Subaru Distributors Corp. v. Subaru of America, Inc. Introduction The case of Subaru Distributors Corp. v. Subaru of America,...
Court Reverses SSA Disability Denial Due to Inadequate Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Assessment

Court Reverses SSA Disability Denial Due to Inadequate Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Assessment

Date: Sep 17, 2005
Court Reverses SSA Disability Denial Due to Inadequate Evaluation of Residual Functional Capacity and Credibility Assessment Introduction In the landmark case of Susan Matejka v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart,...
General Causation and Expert Testimony Standards Affirmed in Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Co.

General Causation and Expert Testimony Standards Affirmed in Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Co.

Date: Sep 17, 2005
General Causation and Expert Testimony Standards Affirmed in Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Co. Introduction Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Company is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Mandatory Judicial Reasoning in Sentencing Beyond Guidelines: Analysis of Lewis v. United States

Mandatory Judicial Reasoning in Sentencing Beyond Guidelines: Analysis of Lewis v. United States

Date: Sep 16, 2005
Mandatory Judicial Reasoning in Sentencing Beyond Guidelines: Analysis of Lewis v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Myrisa V. Lewis, 424 F.3d 239 (2d Cir. 2005), is a pivotal...
Reaffirmation of Jury Duties and Sentencing Protocols in Racketeering Cases: Insights from United States v. Sean Carr

Reaffirmation of Jury Duties and Sentencing Protocols in Racketeering Cases: Insights from United States v. Sean Carr

Date: Sep 15, 2005
Reaffirmation of Jury Duties and Sentencing Protocols in Racketeering Cases: Insights from United States v. Sean Carr Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Sean Carr, 424 F.3d 213...
Second Circuit Clarifies Distinct Roles of 'Eighty Percent' and 'Qualified Mortgage' Warranties in CMBS Transactions

Second Circuit Clarifies Distinct Roles of 'Eighty Percent' and 'Qualified Mortgage' Warranties in CMBS Transactions

Date: Sep 15, 2005
Second Circuit Clarifies Distinct Roles of 'Eighty Percent' and 'Qualified Mortgage' Warranties in CMBS Transactions Introduction In the landmark case LaSalle Bank National Association v. Nomura...
Absolute Immunity Reinforced in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Shmueli v. Fairstein & Mitchell

Absolute Immunity Reinforced in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Shmueli v. Fairstein & Mitchell

Date: Sep 15, 2005
Absolute Immunity Reinforced in Malicious Prosecution Claims: Shmueli v. Fairstein & Mitchell Introduction Case: Sarit Shmueli v. The City of New York, New York City Police Department, Martin...
Arbitration Agreements Remain Enforceable Despite Subsequent Merger and Forum Selection Clauses

Arbitration Agreements Remain Enforceable Despite Subsequent Merger and Forum Selection Clauses

Date: Sep 14, 2005
Arbitration Agreements Remain Enforceable Despite Subsequent Merger and Forum Selection Clauses Introduction The case of Bank Julius Baer Co., Ltd. v. Waxfield Ltd. (424 F.3d 278) adjudicated by the...
Limitations on RLA Preemption of State Defamation Claims: Sullivan v. American Airlines

Limitations on RLA Preemption of State Defamation Claims: Sullivan v. American Airlines

Date: Sep 14, 2005
Limitations on RLA Preemption of State Defamation Claims: Sullivan v. American Airlines Introduction In the landmark case of Sullivan, Kennedy, Virella, and Argentina v. American Airlines, Inc., the...
Reinforcing Standards in Anti-Structuring Prosecutions: United States v. MacPherson

Reinforcing Standards in Anti-Structuring Prosecutions: United States v. MacPherson

Date: Sep 14, 2005
Reinforcing Standards in Anti-Structuring Prosecutions: United States v. MacPherson Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. William MacPherson, 424 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2005), the United...
Second Circuit Establishes Exclusive Authority of Debtor-in-Possession to Settle Adversary Proceedings under Rule 9019

Second Circuit Establishes Exclusive Authority of Debtor-in-Possession to Settle Adversary Proceedings under Rule 9019

Date: Sep 13, 2005
Second Circuit Establishes Exclusive Authority of Debtor-in-Possession to Settle Adversary Proceedings under Rule 9019 Introduction In the case of In Re SMART WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Freewwweb, LLC,...
USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination

USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination

Date: Sep 13, 2005
USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination Introduction The case of Jacqueline J. Morris-Hayes v. Board of Education of the Chester Union...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert