Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of the Constitutionality of New York's DNA Indexing Statute under the Special-Needs Test

Affirmation of the Constitutionality of New York's DNA Indexing Statute under the Special-Needs Test

Date: Nov 29, 2005
Affirmation of the Constitutionality of New York's DNA Indexing Statute under the Special-Needs Test Introduction In the landmark case of Jason B. Nicholas et al. v. Alvaro Sanchez et al., decided by...
Second Circuit Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction for NHPA Section 106 in Empowerment Zones

Second Circuit Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction for NHPA Section 106 in Empowerment Zones

Date: Nov 23, 2005
Second Circuit Clarifies Federal Jurisdiction for NHPA Section 106 in Empowerment Zones Introduction The case of Business and Residents Alliance of East Harlem et al. v. Jackson et al. (430 F.3d 584)...
Establishing the "More Likely Than Not" Standard for CAT Claims: Mu Xiang Lin v. U.S. Department of Justice

Establishing the "More Likely Than Not" Standard for CAT Claims: Mu Xiang Lin v. U.S. Department of Justice

Date: Nov 23, 2005
Establishing the "More Likely Than Not" Standard for CAT Claims: Mu Xiang Lin v. United States Department of Justice Introduction Mu Xiang Lin v. United States Department of Justice is a pivotal case...
Second Circuit Limits Application of Prison Mailbox Rule in WALKER v. JASTREMSKI

Second Circuit Limits Application of Prison Mailbox Rule in WALKER v. JASTREMSKI

Date: Nov 16, 2005
Second Circuit Limits Application of Prison Mailbox Rule in WALKER v. JASTREMSKI, 430 F.3d 560 (2d Cir. 2005) Introduction The case of Jeffrey A. Walker v. David Jastremski et al. brings to the...
Deference to Administrative Credibility Findings in Asylum Cases: Majidi v. Gonzales

Deference to Administrative Credibility Findings in Asylum Cases: Majidi v. Gonzales

Date: Nov 16, 2005
Deference to Administrative Credibility Findings in Asylum Cases: Majidi v. Gonzales Introduction Majidi v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 77 (2d Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case that underscores the deference...
Expansion of Section 804(c) Under the Fair Housing Act: Insights from United States v. Space Hunters, Inc.

Expansion of Section 804(c) Under the Fair Housing Act: Insights from United States v. Space Hunters, Inc.

Date: Nov 10, 2005
Expansion of Section 804(c) Under the Fair Housing Act: Insights from United States v. Space Hunters, Inc. Introduction In United States v. Space Hunters, Inc., John McDermott, the United States...
Licensing Obligations and Tortious Interference in Music Distribution: 24/7 Records v. Sony Music Entertainment

Licensing Obligations and Tortious Interference in Music Distribution: 24/7 Records v. Sony Music Entertainment

Date: Nov 9, 2005
Licensing Obligations and Tortious Interference in Music Distribution: 24/7 Records v. Sony Music Entertainment Introduction The case of 24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc. and...
Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Credibility Assessments in Asylum Claims

Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Credibility Assessments in Asylum Claims

Date: Nov 5, 2005
Cao He Lin v. United States Department of Justice: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Credibility Assessments in Asylum Claims Introduction The case of Cao He Lin, a/k/a Je Ling Chao v. United...
Defining Extortion Under the Hobbs Act: Insights from United States v. Chen and Wu

Defining Extortion Under the Hobbs Act: Insights from United States v. Chen and Wu

Date: Nov 2, 2005
Defining Extortion Under the Hobbs Act: Insights from United States v. Chen and Wu Introduction The case of United States v. Chen and Wu, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Affirmation of Extraterritorial Conspiracy Convictions and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims in United States v. Cohen

Affirmation of Extraterritorial Conspiracy Convictions and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims in United States v. Cohen

Date: Oct 21, 2005
Affirmation of Extraterritorial Conspiracy Convictions and Rejection of Ineffective Assistance Claims in United States v. Cohen Introduction In the case of United States v. Cohen, the United States...
Sentencing in the Alternative Post-Blakely: Insights from United States v. Fuller

Sentencing in the Alternative Post-Blakely: Insights from United States v. Fuller

Date: Oct 18, 2005
Sentencing in the Alternative Post-Blakely: Insights from United States v. Fuller Introduction The case of United States of America v. John Fuller (426 F.3d 556, 2005) presents a pivotal moment in...
Affirming Summary Judgment in §1983 Actions Based on Inconsistent Plaintiff Testimony: Jeffreys v. City of New York

Affirming Summary Judgment in §1983 Actions Based on Inconsistent Plaintiff Testimony: Jeffreys v. City of New York

Date: Oct 18, 2005
Affirming Summary Judgment in §1983 Actions Based on Inconsistent Plaintiff Testimony: Jeffreys v. City of New York Introduction The case of Percy Jeffreys v. The City of New York addresses crucial...
Gersten v. Senkowski: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Gersten v. Senkowski: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Oct 18, 2005
Gersten v. Senkowski: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Child Sexual Abuse Cases 1. Introduction Gersten v. Senkowski is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Recognition of Anti-Corruption as Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: An Analysis of Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales

Recognition of Anti-Corruption as Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: An Analysis of Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales

Date: Oct 14, 2005
Recognition of Anti-Corruption as Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: An Analysis of Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales Introduction The case of Yueqing Zhang v. Alberto Gonzales addresses critical...
Second Circuit Rules Shareholders of Failed Merger Cannot Sue as Third-Party Beneficiaries for Lost Premium

Second Circuit Rules Shareholders of Failed Merger Cannot Sue as Third-Party Beneficiaries for Lost Premium

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Second Circuit Rules Shareholders of Failed Merger Cannot Sue as Third-Party Beneficiaries for Lost Premium Introduction The case of Consolidated Edison, Inc. v. Northeast Utilities delves into the...
Louis Vuitton v. Burlington Coat Factory: Reevaluating Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement

Louis Vuitton v. Burlington Coat Factory: Reevaluating Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Louis Vuitton v. Burlington Coat Factory: Reevaluating Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Infringement Introduction The case of Louis Vuitton MALLETIER v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp....
Courts Determine Employer Status Under MPPAA, Not Arbitrators: Teamsters Conference Pension Fund v. Express Services

Courts Determine Employer Status Under MPPAA, Not Arbitrators: Teamsters Conference Pension Fund v. Express Services

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Courts Determine Employer Status Under MPPAA, Not Arbitrators: Teamsters Conference Pension Fund v. Express Services Introduction In the case of New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and...
O'Connor v. Wethersfield Board of Education: A Landmark Ruling on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Employment Law

O'Connor v. Wethersfield Board of Education: A Landmark Ruling on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Employment Law

Date: Oct 12, 2005
O'Connor v. Wethersfield Board of Education: A Landmark Ruling on Procedural and Substantive Due Process in Employment Law Introduction The case of Thomas O'Connor v. Wethersfield Board of Education,...
Personal Jurisdiction and Antitrust Standing under Clayton Act Section 12: Comprehensive Analysis of Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine

Personal Jurisdiction and Antitrust Standing under Clayton Act Section 12: Comprehensive Analysis of Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine

Date: Oct 8, 2005
Personal Jurisdiction and Antitrust Standing under Clayton Act Section 12: Comprehensive Analysis of Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine Introduction Daniel v. American Board of Emergency...
Twombly Reaffirmed: Notice Pleading Standards in Sherman Act Antitrust Conspiracies

Twombly Reaffirmed: Notice Pleading Standards in Sherman Act Antitrust Conspiracies

Date: Oct 4, 2005
Twombly Reaffirmed: Notice Pleading Standards in Sherman Act Antitrust Conspiracies Introduction The case of Twombly v. Dually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Lawrence Marcus, Indi...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert