Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination

USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination

Date: Sep 13, 2005
USERRA's Exclusive Enforcement Mechanism Limits 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Claims in Employment Discrimination Introduction The case of Jacqueline J. Morris-Hayes v. Board of Education of the Chester Union...
Second Circuit Holds Disclaimers Must Effectively Prevent Consumer Confusion in Trademark Infringement

Second Circuit Holds Disclaimers Must Effectively Prevent Consumer Confusion in Trademark Infringement

Date: Sep 13, 2005
Second Circuit Holds Disclaimers Must Effectively Prevent Consumer Confusion in Trademark Infringement Introduction In the landmark case of Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Luigino's, Inc., the...
Karedes v. Ackerley Group: Appellate Insights on Defamation Standards

Karedes v. Ackerley Group: Appellate Insights on Defamation Standards

Date: Sep 10, 2005
Karedes v. Ackerley Group: Appellate Insights on Defamation Standards Introduction In the case of John L. Karedes v. The Ackerley Group, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Imputed Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: Insights from Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales

Imputed Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: Insights from Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales

Date: Sep 10, 2005
Imputed Political Opinion in Asylum Claims: Insights from Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales Introduction Chun Gao v. Alberto R. Gonzales, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Second Circuit Establishes Broad Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under CERCLA Section 107(a) Post-Cooper Industries

Second Circuit Establishes Broad Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under CERCLA Section 107(a) Post-Cooper Industries

Date: Sep 10, 2005
Second Circuit Establishes Broad Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under CERCLA Section 107(a) Post-Cooper Industries Introduction In the landmark case Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. UGI...
Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Privity in Election Litigation: Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections

Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Privity in Election Litigation: Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections

Date: Sep 3, 2005
Clarifying Rooker-Feldman Doctrine and Privity in Election Litigation: Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections Introduction The case of Hoblock v. Albany County Board of Elections presents a...
Capobianco v. City of New York: Expanding ADA Protections for Employees with Night Blindness

Capobianco v. City of New York: Expanding ADA Protections for Employees with Night Blindness

Date: Sep 2, 2005
Capobianco v. City of New York: Expanding ADA Protections for Employees with Night Blindness Introduction Anthony P. Capobianco, Jr. filed a lawsuit against the City of New York and the New York City...
Reaffirming Standards for Motion to Remand with New Evidence in Asylum Claims: Cao v. US Department of Justice

Reaffirming Standards for Motion to Remand with New Evidence in Asylum Claims: Cao v. US Department of Justice

Date: Sep 1, 2005
Reaffirming Standards for Motion to Remand with New Evidence in Asylum Claims: Cao v. US Department of Justice Introduction Li Yong Cao v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General...
De Novo Review Standard in Asylum Cases: Huang v. INS Analysis

De Novo Review Standard in Asylum Cases: Huang v. INS Analysis

Date: Aug 30, 2005
De Novo Review Standard in Asylum Cases: Huang v. INS Analysis Introduction The case of Jian Xing Huang v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), 421 F.3d 125 (2d Cir. 2005),...
Affirmation of Dismissal in ERISA Claims: Nechis & Mady v. Oxford Health Plans and Triad Healthcare

Affirmation of Dismissal in ERISA Claims: Nechis & Mady v. Oxford Health Plans and Triad Healthcare

Date: Aug 25, 2005
Affirmation of Dismissal in ERISA Claims: Nechis & Mady v. Oxford Health Plans and Triad Healthcare Introduction In the case of Nechis and Mady v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc. and Triad Healthcare,...
Expansion of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Protections in Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

Expansion of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Protections in Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp.

Date: Aug 24, 2005
Expansion of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Protections in Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp. Introduction Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp., 420 F.3d 166 (2d Cir. 2005), marks a significant development...
Second Circuit Establishes Drug Quantity Must Be Proven to Jury or Admitted by Defendant for Aggravated §841 Offenses

Second Circuit Establishes Drug Quantity Must Be Proven to Jury or Admitted by Defendant for Aggravated §841 Offenses

Date: Aug 23, 2005
Second Circuit Establishes Drug Quantity Must Be Proven to Jury or Admitted by Defendant for Aggravated §841 Offenses Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Manuel Gonzalez,...
Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: United States v. Coreas

Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: United States v. Coreas

Date: Aug 19, 2005
Reaffirming Probable Cause Standards in Search Warrants: United States v. Coreas Introduction The case of United States v. Willie Coreas (419 F.3d 151) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Re-defining Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude: Insights from Shobinder Gill v. INS

Re-defining Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude: Insights from Shobinder Gill v. INS

Date: Aug 19, 2005
Re-defining Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude: Insights from Shobinder Gill v. INS Introduction The case of Shobinder Gill v. Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS), decided by the United...
Clarifying Default Judgment Standards: Appearance and Notice under Federal Rules in State of New York v. Green (2d Cir. 2005)

Clarifying Default Judgment Standards: Appearance and Notice under Federal Rules in State of New York v. Green (2d Cir. 2005)

Date: Aug 19, 2005
Clarifying Default Judgment Standards: Appearance and Notice under Federal Rules in State of New York v. Green (2d Cir. 2005) Introduction State of New York and Erin D. Crotty, serving as...
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Claims: Insights from IN RE ENRON CORP. Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Enron Corp.

Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Claims: Insights from IN RE ENRON CORP. Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Enron Corp.

Date: Aug 17, 2005
Excusable Neglect in Bankruptcy Claims: Insights from IN RE ENRON CORP. Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Enron Corp. Introduction The bankruptcy of Enron Corporation in 2001 marked...
Poradisova v. Gonzales: Emphasizing Cumulative Evidence and Bolstered Country Conditions in Asylum Decisions

Poradisova v. Gonzales: Emphasizing Cumulative Evidence and Bolstered Country Conditions in Asylum Decisions

Date: Aug 17, 2005
Poradisova v. Gonzales: Emphasizing Cumulative Evidence and Bolstered Country Conditions in Asylum Decisions Introduction In Tatiana Poradisova, et al. v. Alberto Gonzales, the United States Court of...
Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Extinguish Maritime Liens in In re Millenium Seacarriers, Inc.

Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Extinguish Maritime Liens in In re Millenium Seacarriers, Inc.

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Second Circuit Affirms Bankruptcy Court's Jurisdiction to Extinguish Maritime Liens in In re Millenium Seacarriers, Inc. Introduction The case of In re: Millenium Seacarriers, Inc. et al., heard by...
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Cable Rate Discrimination Claims Due to Lack of Private Right of Action under 47 U.S.C. §543(d) and New York's PSL §224-a(4)

Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Cable Rate Discrimination Claims Due to Lack of Private Right of Action under 47 U.S.C. §543(d) and New York's PSL §224-a(4)

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Cable Rate Discrimination Claims Due to Lack of Private Right of Action under 47 U.S.C. §543(d) and New York's PSL §224-a(4) Introduction In the landmark case of...
Wells v. Greiner: Upholding Defense Counsel's Strategic Discretion Under Strickland Standard

Wells v. Greiner: Upholding Defense Counsel's Strategic Discretion Under Strickland Standard

Date: Aug 9, 2005
Wells v. Greiner: Upholding Defense Counsel's Strategic Discretion Under Strickland Standard Introduction Wells v. Greiner is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert