Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Disability Claim: Burden of Proof and Reasonable Accommodation Clarified

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Disability Claim: Burden of Proof and Reasonable Accommodation Clarified

Date: Nov 19, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ADA Disability Claim: Burden of Proof and Reasonable Accommodation Clarified Introduction The case of Rosemary Feliciano v. State of Rhode Island adjudicated before...
Reinforcing Pleading Standards in Equal Protection §1983 Claims: Judge v. City of Lowell

Reinforcing Pleading Standards in Equal Protection §1983 Claims: Judge v. City of Lowell

Date: Nov 19, 1998
Reinforcing Pleading Standards in Equal Protection §1983 Claims: Judge v. City of Lowell Introduction Judge v. City of Lowell, 160 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 1998), is a significant appellate court decision...
Enhancing Substantial Evidence Standards in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Rohrberg v. Apfel

Enhancing Substantial Evidence Standards in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Rohrberg v. Apfel

Date: Nov 13, 1998
Enhancing Substantial Evidence Standards in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Rohrberg v. Apfel Introduction The case of Jill Rohrberg v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Acting Commissioner, Social...
Affirming the Conversion of Rule 12(c) Motion to Summary Judgment: Collier v. City of Chicopee

Affirming the Conversion of Rule 12(c) Motion to Summary Judgment: Collier v. City of Chicopee

Date: Oct 21, 1998
Affirming the Conversion of Rule 12(c) Motion to Summary Judgment: Collier v. City of Chicopee Introduction In the landmark case of Collier v. City of Chicopee, heard by the United States Court of...
Reaffirming Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Standards under Title VII: Hernández-Torres v. Intercontinental Trading, Inc.

Reaffirming Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Standards under Title VII: Hernández-Torres v. Intercontinental Trading, Inc.

Date: Oct 14, 1998
Reaffirming Hostile Work Environment and Retaliation Standards under Title VII: Hernández-Torres v. Intercontinental Trading, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Hernández-Torres, et al. v....
De Facto Arrest in Airport Detention: Acosta-Colon v. United States

De Facto Arrest in Airport Detention: Acosta-Colon v. United States

Date: Oct 6, 1998
De Facto Arrest in Airport Detention: Acosta-Colon v. United States Introduction Acosta-Colon v. United States is a landmark judgment from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit,...
Strict Enforcement of Discovery Obligations: Trial by Ambush Disallowed in Klonoski v. Mahlab

Strict Enforcement of Discovery Obligations: Trial by Ambush Disallowed in Klonoski v. Mahlab

Date: Sep 24, 1998
Strict Enforcement of Discovery Obligations: Trial by Ambush Disallowed in Klonoski v. Mahlab Introduction The case of Richard F. Klonoski, M.D., et al. v. Benjamin Mahlab, M.D., et al. represents a...
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Permissive Counterclaims: Insights from Iglesias v. MONY

Supplemental Jurisdiction and Permissive Counterclaims: Insights from Iglesias v. MONY

Date: Sep 18, 1998
Supplemental Jurisdiction and Permissive Counterclaims: Insights from Iglesias v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York Introduction The case of Manuel A. Iglesias v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of...
Age Discrimination in Employment: Shorette v. Rite Aid Establishes Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Support

Age Discrimination in Employment: Shorette v. Rite Aid Establishes Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Support

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Age Discrimination in Employment: Shorette v. Rite Aid Establishes Rigorous Standards for Evidentiary Support Introduction The case of Peter W. Shorette, Sr. v. Rite Aid of Maine, Inc. (155 F.3d 8)...
Non-Assignability Clauses and ERISA: Establishing Boundaries in Health Insurance Benefit Assignments

Non-Assignability Clauses and ERISA: Establishing Boundaries in Health Insurance Benefit Assignments

Date: Sep 12, 1998
Non-Assignability Clauses and ERISA: Establishing Boundaries in Health Insurance Benefit Assignments Introduction The case of City of Hope National Medical Center v. HealthPlus, Inc., 156 F.3d 223...
Strict Products Liability Limitations for Hotel Operators: Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International

Strict Products Liability Limitations for Hotel Operators: Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International

Date: Aug 26, 1998
Strict Products Liability Limitations for Hotel Operators: Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International Introduction Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International of Puerto Rico, Inc. is a pivotal case decided by...
Alvarez-Fonseca v. Pepsi Cola: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Age Discrimination Claims

Alvarez-Fonseca v. Pepsi Cola: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Age Discrimination Claims

Date: Aug 6, 1998
Alvarez-Fonseca v. Pepsi Cola: Reinforcing Burden of Proof in Age Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Jose R. Alvarez-Fonseca v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Company addresses...
Affirming UCC §2-207: Limitations on Damages-Limitation Clauses in Merchant-to-Merchant Contracts - Chipco v. Adell Plastics

Affirming UCC §2-207: Limitations on Damages-Limitation Clauses in Merchant-to-Merchant Contracts - Chipco v. Adell Plastics

Date: Aug 5, 1998
Affirming UCC §2-207: Limitations on Damages-Limitation Clauses in Merchant-to-Merchant Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of JOM, Inc., d/b/a Chipco International, Ltd. v. Adell Plastics,...
Essential Job Functions and Collective Bargaining Agreements Under ADA: Laurin v. Providence Hospital

Essential Job Functions and Collective Bargaining Agreements Under ADA: Laurin v. Providence Hospital

Date: Jul 29, 1998
Essential Job Functions and Collective Bargaining Agreements Under ADA: Laurin v. Providence Hospital Introduction In the landmark case of Sharon Laurin v. The Providence Hospital and Massachusetts...
Clarifying Honest Services Fraud: First Circuit Upholds Convictions Under Revised Standards

Clarifying Honest Services Fraud: First Circuit Upholds Convictions Under Revised Standards

Date: Jul 21, 1998
Clarifying Honest Services Fraud: First Circuit Upholds Convictions Under Revised Standards Introduction In the case of United States v. Francis H. Woodward, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of HECK v. HUMPHREY in section 1983 Unconstitutional Conviction Claims

Affirmation of HECK v. HUMPHREY in section 1983 Unconstitutional Conviction Claims

Date: Jul 21, 1998
Affirmation of HECK v. HUMPHREY in section 1983 Unconstitutional Conviction Claims Introduction In the appellate case JUSTINA FIGUEROA, A/K/A JUSTINA FIGUEROA ECHEVARRIA, ET AL. v. MIGUEL RIVERA,...
Defining Employee Status for Medical Malpractice Immunity: First Circuit's Decision in Torres Vargas v. Cummings

Defining Employee Status for Medical Malpractice Immunity: First Circuit's Decision in Torres Vargas v. Cummings

Date: Jul 11, 1998
Defining Employee Status for Medical Malpractice Immunity: First Circuit's Decision in Torres Vargas v. Cummings Introduction In the landmark case Ines Torres Vargas, et al. v. Dr. Manuel Santiago...
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Defendants

Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Defendants

Date: Jun 30, 1998
Supervisory Liability and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Defendants Introduction In the landmark case Grancid Camilo-Robles v. Dr. Guillermo Hoyos et al., the United...
Establishing Chapter 93A Liability for Bad Faith Payment Practices: Dooyang Corp. v. Arthur D. Little

Establishing Chapter 93A Liability for Bad Faith Payment Practices: Dooyang Corp. v. Arthur D. Little

Date: Jun 26, 1998
Establishing Chapter 93A Liability for Bad Faith Payment Practices: Dooyang Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Introduction In the landmark case of Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Dooyang Corporation, decided on...
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege Over Public Access: Siedle v. Putnam Investments

Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege Over Public Access: Siedle v. Putnam Investments

Date: Jun 17, 1998
Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege Over Public Access: Siedle v. Putnam Investments Introduction Edward A.H. Siedle, a former in-house counsel for Putnam Investments, Inc., initiated legal action...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert