Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of ADA Protections for Employees with Mental Disabilities in Leave Requests

Affirmation of ADA Protections for Employees with Mental Disabilities in Leave Requests

Date: Jun 6, 1998
Affirmation of ADA Protections for Employees with Mental Disabilities in Leave Requests Introduction The case of Elizabeth Criado v. IBM Corporation addresses significant issues under the Americans...
First Circuit Affirms Substantial Evidence Standard in ERISA Disability Disputes

First Circuit Affirms Substantial Evidence Standard in ERISA Disability Disputes

Date: Jun 3, 1998
First Circuit Affirms Substantial Evidence Standard in ERISA Disability Disputes Introduction The case of Robert Doyle v. The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, adjudicated by the United States...
Enforcing Capital Contribution Obligations in Real Estate Partnerships: Insights from Bank v. IBM

Enforcing Capital Contribution Obligations in Real Estate Partnerships: Insights from Bank v. IBM

Date: May 30, 1998
Enforcing Capital Contribution Obligations in Real Estate Partnerships: Insights from Bank v. IBM Introduction The case of BANK v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPoration (IBM), decided by the...
Terry v. Bayer Corporation: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Termination under ERISA Standards

Terry v. Bayer Corporation: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Termination under ERISA Standards

Date: May 28, 1998
Terry v. Bayer Corporation: Affirmation of Disability Benefits Termination under ERISA Standards Introduction Terry v. Bayer Corporation, 145 F.3d 28 (1st Cir. 1998), presents a significant appellate...
Interpreting AEDPA § 2254(d)(1): Establishing a Two-Step Framework in O'Brien v. Dubois

Interpreting AEDPA § 2254(d)(1): Establishing a Two-Step Framework in O'Brien v. Dubois

Date: May 27, 1998
Interpreting AEDPA § 2254(d)(1): Establishing a Two-Step Framework in O'Brien v. Dubois Introduction Robert O'Brien v. Larry E. Dubois, a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Retaliation in Employment Law: Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy Establishes Clarified Standards

Retaliation in Employment Law: Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy Establishes Clarified Standards

Date: May 27, 1998
Retaliation in Employment Law: Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy Establishes Clarified Standards Introduction Provencher v. CVS Pharmacy is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Negligence and Evidence Destruction: Insights from Testa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Negligence and Evidence Destruction: Insights from Testa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Date: May 22, 1998
Negligence and Evidence Destruction: Insights from Testa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of Louis R. Testa v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., decided on May 21, 1998, the United...
Broad Interpretation of FMLA Protections Affirmed in Hodgens v. General Dynamics

Broad Interpretation of FMLA Protections Affirmed in Hodgens v. General Dynamics

Date: May 22, 1998
Broad Interpretation of FMLA Protections Affirmed in Hodgens v. General Dynamics Introduction In the landmark case of John M. Hodgens v. General Dynamics Corporation (144 F.3d 151, First Circuit, May...
Limitations on Contractual and Estoppel Claims in At-Will Employment: Hinchey v. NYNEX

Limitations on Contractual and Estoppel Claims in At-Will Employment: Hinchey v. NYNEX

Date: May 21, 1998
Limitations on Contractual and Estoppel Claims in At-Will Employment: Hinchey v. NYNEX Introduction The case of John A. Hinchey v. NYNEX Corporation, and Telesector Resources Group, Inc. (144 F.3d...
Miranda Violations and the Suppression of Self-Incriminating Testimony: An Analysis of United States v. Byram

Miranda Violations and the Suppression of Self-Incriminating Testimony: An Analysis of United States v. Byram

Date: May 21, 1998
Miranda Violations and the Suppression of Self-Incriminating Testimony: An Analysis of United States v. Byram Introduction United States of America v. Herman Joseph Byram, Jr. is a pivotal case...
Non-Retroactivity of AEDPA § 440(d) in Deportation Cases: Goncalves v. Reno

Non-Retroactivity of AEDPA § 440(d) in Deportation Cases: Goncalves v. Reno

Date: May 16, 1998
Non-Retroactivity of AEDPA § 440(d) in Deportation Cases: Goncalves v. Reno Introduction The case of Raul Percira Goncalves v. Janet Reno addresses a critical issue in immigration law concerning the...
Expansion of 'Arising Out Of' Clause in Additional Insured Endorsements: First Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend and Indemnify

Expansion of 'Arising Out Of' Clause in Additional Insured Endorsements: First Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend and Indemnify

Date: May 2, 1998
Expansion of 'Arising Out Of' Clause in Additional Insured Endorsements: First Circuit Affirms Duty to Defend and Indemnify Introduction The case Merchants Insurance Company of New Hampshire, Inc. v....
Strict Enforcement of Insurance Policy Limitations and Rejection of Equitable Estoppel in LaChapelle v. Berkshire Life Insurance

Strict Enforcement of Insurance Policy Limitations and Rejection of Equitable Estoppel in LaChapelle v. Berkshire Life Insurance

Date: Apr 30, 1998
Strict Enforcement of Insurance Policy Limitations and Rejection of Equitable Estoppel in LaChapelle v. Berkshire Life Insurance Introduction The case of RONALD R. LaChapelle v. BERKSHIRE LIFE...
Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Association: Redefining Accreditation and Jurisdiction Standards

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Association: Redefining Accreditation and Jurisdiction Standards

Date: Apr 25, 1998
Massachusetts School of Law at Andover v. American Bar Association: Redefining Accreditation and Jurisdiction Standards Introduction In Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc. v. American Bar...
Solidary Liability of Insurers and Insured in Statute of Limitations Interruption

Solidary Liability of Insurers and Insured in Statute of Limitations Interruption

Date: Apr 22, 1998
Solidary Liability of Insurers and Insured in Statute of Limitations Interruption Introduction The case of TOKYO MARINE AND FIRE INSURANCE CO., LTD. v. PEREZ CIA., DE PUERTO RICO, INC. rendered by...
Gender Discrimination and Jury Verdicts: Insights from Troy v. Bay State Computer Group

Gender Discrimination and Jury Verdicts: Insights from Troy v. Bay State Computer Group

Date: Apr 15, 1998
Gender Discrimination and Jury Verdicts: Insights from Troy v. Bay State Computer Group Introduction The case of Alexandra Troy v. Bay State Computer Group, Inc. addresses critical issues surrounding...
Enforcement of Case-Management Orders and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Rosario-Diaz v. Gonzalez

Enforcement of Case-Management Orders and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Rosario-Diaz v. Gonzalez

Date: Apr 2, 1998
Enforcement of Case-Management Orders and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Rosario-Diaz v. Gonzalez Introduction The case of Maria M. Rosario-Diaz, et al. v. Jose Gonzalez addresses critical issues...
Conversion from Federal to State Charter Disqualifies Federal Court Jurisdiction in Banking Disputes

Conversion from Federal to State Charter Disqualifies Federal Court Jurisdiction in Banking Disputes

Date: Mar 31, 1998
Conversion from Federal to State Charter Disqualifies Federal Court Jurisdiction in Banking Disputes Introduction The case of Dr. Jaime Viqueira, A/K/A Jaime Viqueira Mariani, et al., Plaintiffs,...
Negligence in Medical Malpractice: United States v. Mitchell Establishes Precedents Under Federal Tort Claims Act

Negligence in Medical Malpractice: United States v. Mitchell Establishes Precedents Under Federal Tort Claims Act

Date: Mar 26, 1998
Negligence in Medical Malpractice: United States v. Mitchell Establishes Precedents Under Federal Tort Claims Act Introduction The case of Jean Mitchell et al. v. United States of America (141 F.3d...
Pretext and Punitive Damages in Pay Discrimination under Massachusetts Law: McMillan v. MSPCA

Pretext and Punitive Damages in Pay Discrimination under Massachusetts Law: McMillan v. MSPCA

Date: Mar 19, 1998
Pretext and Punitive Damages in Pay Discrimination under Massachusetts Law: McMillan v. MSPCA Introduction McMillan v. Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (MSPCA), 140 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert