Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility and Credibility Assessments: Aguilar-Solis v. INS

Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility and Credibility Assessments: Aguilar-Solis v. INS

Date: Feb 27, 1999
Rigorous Standards for Asylum Eligibility and Credibility Assessments: Aguilar-Solis v. INS Introduction Reynaldo Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) is a pivotal case...
Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch: First Circuit Defines Appropriateness of Arbitration under 1991 CRA and OWBPA

Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch: First Circuit Defines Appropriateness of Arbitration under 1991 CRA and OWBPA

Date: Feb 25, 1999
Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch: First Circuit Defines Appropriateness of Arbitration under 1991 CRA and OWBPA Introduction In the landmark case Susan M. Rosenberg v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith...
Defining 'Disability' under the ADA: Insights from P. Tardie v. Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island

Defining 'Disability' under the ADA: Insights from P. Tardie v. Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island

Date: Feb 25, 1999
Defining 'Disability' under the ADA: Insights from P. Tardie v. Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island Introduction P. Tardie v. Rehabilitation Hospital of Rhode Island, et al. (168 F.3d 538) is a...
Color of Law Doctrine Reinforced in Barreto-Rivera v. Medina-Vargas

Color of Law Doctrine Reinforced in Barreto-Rivera v. Medina-Vargas

Date: Feb 19, 1999
Color of Law Doctrine Reinforced in Barreto-Rivera v. Medina-Vargas Introduction The case of Amelia Barreto-Rivera, et al. v. Luis R. Medina-Vargas, et al., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Breach of Employment Contract over Variable Incentives: Michelson v. Digital Financial Services

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Breach of Employment Contract over Variable Incentives: Michelson v. Digital Financial Services

Date: Feb 17, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Breach of Employment Contract over Variable Incentive Compensation: Michelson v. Digital Financial Services Introduction The case of Bruce Michelson v. Digital...
Defining the Scope and Particularity of Search Warrants in Digital Investigations: United States v. Upham

Defining the Scope and Particularity of Search Warrants in Digital Investigations: United States v. Upham

Date: Feb 13, 1999
Defining the Scope and Particularity of Search Warrants in Digital Investigations: United States v. Upham Introduction United States v. Troy Upham, 168 F.3d 532 (1st Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case...
Enforceability of Settlement Agreements under ERISA: Morais v. Central Beverage

Enforceability of Settlement Agreements under ERISA: Morais v. Central Beverage

Date: Feb 12, 1999
Enforceability of Settlement Agreements under ERISA: Morais v. Central Beverage Introduction In Fabio T. Morais v. Central Beverage Corporation Union Employees' Supplemental Retirement Plan, Abacus...
Defining Single Conspiracy in Narcotics Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Portela

Defining Single Conspiracy in Narcotics Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Portela

Date: Feb 10, 1999
Defining Single Conspiracy in Narcotics Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Portela Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rafael Portela, Francisco Villamán-Rodríguez, and Juán...
Proper Use of Administrative Closings and Third-Party Impleader: First Circuit in Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLC

Proper Use of Administrative Closings and Third-Party Impleader: First Circuit in Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLC

Date: Jan 28, 1999
Proper Use of Administrative Closings and Third-Party Impleader: First Circuit in Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLC Introduction The case of Barry Lehman v. Revolution Portfolio LLC (166 F.3d 389)...
Reaffirming the Reasonableness Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Doe v. Travelers Insurance Company

Reaffirming the Reasonableness Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Doe v. Travelers Insurance Company

Date: Jan 28, 1999
Reaffirming the Reasonableness Standard in ERISA Benefit Denials: Doe v. Travelers Insurance Company Introduction Doe v. Travelers Insurance Company, 167 F.3d 53 (1999), is a pivotal case decided by...
First Circuit Upholds Standards for Jury Selection and Forfeiture in Drug Conspiracy Case

First Circuit Upholds Standards for Jury Selection and Forfeiture in Drug Conspiracy Case

Date: Jan 23, 1999
First Circuit Upholds Standards for Jury Selection and Forfeiture in Drug Conspiracy Case Introduction In United States v. Candelaria-Silva et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
FAA's Authority to Dismiss Unsubstantiated Aviation Complaints without Evidentiary Hearings Upheld

FAA's Authority to Dismiss Unsubstantiated Aviation Complaints without Evidentiary Hearings Upheld

Date: Jan 20, 1999
FAA's Authority to Dismiss Unsubstantiated Aviation Complaints without Evidentiary Hearings Upheld Introduction In the case of Penobscot Air Services, Ltd. v. Federal Aviation Administration (164...
Discretionary Function Exception Under FTCA: Analysis of Shansky v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Under FTCA: Analysis of Shansky v. United States

Date: Jan 9, 1999
Discretionary Function Exception Under FTCA: Analysis of Shansky v. United States Introduction Nettie Shansky v. United States of America, 164 F.3d 688 (1st Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that...
Bankruptcy Code §522 Preempts Massachusetts Homestead Exemption Exceptions

Bankruptcy Code §522 Preempts Massachusetts Homestead Exemption Exceptions

Date: Jan 8, 1999
Bankruptcy Code §522 Preempts Massachusetts Homestead Exemption Exceptions Introduction In the case of Patriot Portfolio, LLC v. Harry W. Weinstein, the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Defining Employer Status and Personal Liability Under FLSA: Insights from Baystate Staffing v. Herman

Defining Employer Status and Personal Liability Under FLSA: Insights from Baystate Staffing v. Herman

Date: Dec 31, 1998
Defining Employer Status and Personal Liability Under FLSA: Insights from Baystate Alternative Staffing, Inc. et al. v. Herman Introduction The case of Baystate Alternative Staffing, Inc., Able Temps...
Federal Trademark Dilution Act: I.P. Lund Trading APS v. Kohler Co.

Federal Trademark Dilution Act: I.P. Lund Trading APS v. Kohler Co.

Date: Dec 23, 1998
Federal Trademark Dilution Act: I.P. Lund Trading APS v. Kohler Co. Introduction The case of I.P. Lund Trading APS and Kroin Inc. v. Kohler Co. and Robern, Inc., adjudicated by the United States...
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Workplace Inspection Negligence – Irving v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Workplace Inspection Negligence – Irving v. United States

Date: Dec 19, 1998
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Workplace Inspection Negligence – Irving v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Irving v. United States, decided by the...
Protection of Academic Research Materials from Subpoena in Antitrust Litigation

Protection of Academic Research Materials from Subpoena in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Dec 16, 1998
Protection of Academic Research Materials from Subpoena in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of United States v. Microsoft Corporation revolves around Microsoft's attempt to compel the...
Defendant's Entitlement to Attorney's Fees in Frivolous Civil Rights Claims: Analysis of Tang v. State of Rhode Island

Defendant's Entitlement to Attorney's Fees in Frivolous Civil Rights Claims: Analysis of Tang v. State of Rhode Island

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Defendant's Entitlement to Attorney's Fees in Frivolous Civil Rights Claims: Analysis of Tang v. State of Rhode Island Introduction Tang v. State of Rhode Island, Department of Elderly Affairs, 163...
Limitations on Trial Court's Authority to Exclude Scientific Evidence: Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico

Limitations on Trial Court's Authority to Exclude Scientific Evidence: Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico

Date: Dec 2, 1998
Limitations on Trial Court's Authority to Exclude Scientific Evidence: Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Introduction The case of Ruiz-Troche v. Pepsi Cola of Puerto Rico Bottling Company, et...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert