Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Enforcing ADA Title III: Flexible Service Mandates for Disabled Patrons – Dudley v. Hannaford Bros.

Enforcing ADA Title III: Flexible Service Mandates for Disabled Patrons – Dudley v. Hannaford Bros.

Date: Jun 25, 2003
Enforcing ADA Title III: Flexible Service Mandates for Disabled Patrons – Dudley v. Hannaford Bros. Introduction The case of David Dudley v. Hannaford Bros. Co. represents a pivotal moment in the...
Adequate Consideration of Medication Side Effects in Social Security Disability Determinations: Insights from Wells v. Barnhart

Adequate Consideration of Medication Side Effects in Social Security Disability Determinations: Insights from Wells v. Barnhart

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Adequate Consideration of Medication Side Effects in Social Security Disability Determinations: Insights from Wells v. Barnhart Introduction Wells v. Barnhart is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmative Defense in Sexual Harassment Claims: Reed v. MBNA Establishes Crucial Precedents

Affirmative Defense in Sexual Harassment Claims: Reed v. MBNA Establishes Crucial Precedents

Date: Jun 20, 2003
Affirmative Defense in Sexual Harassment Claims: Reed v. MBNA Establishes Crucial Precedents Introduction In the landmark case of Reed v. MBNA Marketing Systems, Inc., the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Anti-Competitive Practices Against Podiatrists

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Anti-Competitive Practices Against Podiatrists

Date: Jun 13, 2003
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Anti-Competitive Practices Against Podiatrists Introduction The case The Podiatrist Association, Inc., et al. v. La Cruz Azul de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Triple-S,...
Kosereis v. State of Rhode Island: Res Judicata and the Litigability of Title VII Discrimination Claims

Kosereis v. State of Rhode Island: Res Judicata and the Litigability of Title VII Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 13, 2003
Kosereis v. State of Rhode Island: Res Judicata and the Litigability of Title VII Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Kosereis v. State of Rhode Island addresses critical issues...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Religious Harassment Case: Rivera v. PRASA

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Religious Harassment Case: Rivera v. PRASA

Date: Jun 10, 2003
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Religious Harassment Case: Rivera v. PRASA Introduction In the landmark case Mayra Rosario Rivera v. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewers Authority (PRASA), decided by...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Benoit v. Technical Manufacturing Corp.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Benoit v. Technical Manufacturing Corp.

Date: Jun 10, 2003
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Benoit v. Technical Manufacturing Corp. Introduction Benoit v. Technical Manufacturing Corporation (331 F.3d 166) is a...
Enforcing Judicial Authority and Ensuring Timely Appeals: Insights from Da v. Young

Enforcing Judicial Authority and Ensuring Timely Appeals: Insights from Da v. Young

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Enforcing Judicial Authority and Ensuring Timely Appeals: Insights from Da v. Young Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. Young, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Apprendi Rule Not Retroactive Under Teague Doctrine in Sepulveda v. United States

Apprendi Rule Not Retroactive Under Teague Doctrine in Sepulveda v. United States

Date: May 30, 2003
Apprendi Rule Not Retroactive Under Teague Doctrine in Sepulveda v. United States Introduction In the landmark case George Sepulveda v. United States of America, decided by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Plan Administrator’s Discretion and Discovery Limits in ERISA Change-in-Control Disputes: Liston v. Unum Corp.

Affirmation of Plan Administrator’s Discretion and Discovery Limits in ERISA Change-in-Control Disputes: Liston v. Unum Corp.

Date: May 28, 2003
Affirmation of Plan Administrator’s Discretion and Discovery Limits in ERISA Change-in-Control Disputes: Liston v. Unum Corp. Introduction In Liston v. Unum Corporation Officer Severance Plan, the...
Nonassumption of Prepetition Executory Agreements and Administrative Priority: In re FBI Distribution Corp.

Nonassumption of Prepetition Executory Agreements and Administrative Priority: In re FBI Distribution Corp.

Date: May 28, 2003
Nonassumption of Prepetition Executory Agreements and Administrative Priority: In re FBI Distribution Corp. Introduction The case of In re: FBI Distribution Corp., 330 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2003), delves...
Rescission of Contracts and Director Liability for Fraudulent Inducement: Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues Sets New Precedents

Rescission of Contracts and Director Liability for Fraudulent Inducement: Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues Sets New Precedents

Date: May 20, 2003
Rescission of Contracts and Director Liability for Fraudulent Inducement: Kenda Corp. v. Pot O'Gold Money Leagues Sets New Precedents Introduction The case of Kenda Corporation, Inc. d/b/a Pot O'Gold...
Establishing Disgorgement Precedents in Insider Trading: SEC v. Sargent and Shepard

Establishing Disgorgement Precedents in Insider Trading: SEC v. Sargent and Shepard

Date: May 16, 2003
Establishing Disgorgement Precedents in Insider Trading: SEC v. Sargent and Shepard Introduction The case of SEC v. Michael G. Sargent and Dennis J. Shepard, decided by the United States Court of...
First Circuit Clarifies Consent and Interception under ECPA in Pharmatrak Privacy Litigation

First Circuit Clarifies Consent and Interception under ECPA in Pharmatrak Privacy Litigation

Date: May 10, 2003
First Circuit Clarifies Consent and Interception under ECPA in Pharmatrak Privacy Litigation Introduction The case of In re Pharmatrak, Inc. Privacy Litigation revolves around significant questions...
Enforcing Strict Compliance with Safety Valve Statute and Supervisory Release Procedures: Insights from U.S. v. Matos and Ovalles-Torres

Enforcing Strict Compliance with Safety Valve Statute and Supervisory Release Procedures: Insights from U.S. v. Matos and Ovalles-Torres

Date: May 8, 2003
Enforcing Strict Compliance with Safety Valve Statute and Supervisory Release Procedures: Insights from U.S. v. Matos and Ovalles-Torres Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America...
Cochran v. Quest Software: Affirming At-Will Employment and Stock Option Terms

Cochran v. Quest Software: Affirming At-Will Employment and Stock Option Terms

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Cochran v. Quest Software: Affirming At-Will Employment and Stock Option Terms Introduction In the landmark case Brian Cochran v. Quest Software, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Mandel v. Town of Orleans: Establishing Limits on Federal Court Injunctive Relief in Custody Disputes

Mandel v. Town of Orleans: Establishing Limits on Federal Court Injunctive Relief in Custody Disputes

Date: Apr 16, 2003
Mandel v. Town of Orleans: Establishing Limits on Federal Court Injunctive Relief in Custody Disputes Introduction Mandel v. Town of Orleans is a pivotal decision by the United States Court of...
Standing Requirements in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger

Standing Requirements in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger

Date: Apr 15, 2003
Standing Requirements in Civil Forfeiture: United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger Introduction United States v. One-Sixth Share of James J. Bulger is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Resurrection of Dismissed Habeas Petitions: The Rodwell Decision

Resurrection of Dismissed Habeas Petitions: The Rodwell Decision

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Resurrection of Dismissed Habeas Petitions: The Rodwell Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Rodwell v. Pepe, 324 F.3d 66 (1st Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Waiver of Arbitration Rights in International Commercial Disputes: Analysis of Restoration Preservation Masonry v. Grove Europe

Waiver of Arbitration Rights in International Commercial Disputes: Analysis of Restoration Preservation Masonry v. Grove Europe

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Waiver of Arbitration Rights in International Commercial Disputes: Analysis of Restoration Preservation Masonry v. Grove Europe Introduction Restoration Preservation Masonry, Inc. v. Grove Europe...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert