Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Brady Compliance: First Circuit Upholds Habeas Relief in Norton v. Spencer

Enhancing Brady Compliance: First Circuit Upholds Habeas Relief in Norton v. Spencer

Date: Oct 31, 2003
Enhancing Brady Compliance: First Circuit Upholds Habeas Relief in Norton v. Spencer Introduction In Roger Norton v. Luis Spencer, 351 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2003), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: XYZ Corporation v. United States

Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: XYZ Corporation v. United States

Date: Oct 23, 2003
Implied Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege: XYZ Corporation v. United States Introduction Case: In re KEEPER OF THE RECORDS (GRAND JURY SUBPOENA ADDRESSED TO XYZ CORPORATION). XYZ Corporation,...
Strict Service Requirements and the Limited Scope of Rule 60(b): Analysis of CAISSE v. DUBOIS

Strict Service Requirements and the Limited Scope of Rule 60(b): Analysis of CAISSE v. DUBOIS

Date: Oct 7, 2003
Strict Service Requirements and the Limited Scope of Rule 60(b): Analysis of CAISSE v. DUBOIS Introduction CAISSE v. DUBOIS, 346 F.3d 213 (1st Cir. 2003), is a significant appellate decision...
Corporations Excluded from Section 362(h) Damages for Automatic Stay Violations: In re Spookyworld, Inc.

Corporations Excluded from Section 362(h) Damages for Automatic Stay Violations: In re Spookyworld, Inc.

Date: Sep 26, 2003
Corporations Excluded from Section 362(h) Damages for Automatic Stay Violations: In re Spookyworld, Inc. Introduction The case of In re: Spookyworld, Inc. (346 F.3d 1) revolves around the Town of...
First Circuit Upholds Non-Arbitration for Nonsignatory Parties under FAA Chapter 2

First Circuit Upholds Non-Arbitration for Nonsignatory Parties under FAA Chapter 2

Date: Sep 23, 2003
First Circuit Upholds Non-Arbitration for Nonsignatory Parties under FAA Chapter 2 Introduction In the landmark case of InterGen N.V. v. Eric F. Grina, Alstom (Switzerland) Limited, and Alstom Power...
Clarifying Property Interests in Transitory Public Employment under Law 52: Maria E. Gomez Candelaria v. Jose A. Rivera Rodriguez

Clarifying Property Interests in Transitory Public Employment under Law 52: Maria E. Gomez Candelaria v. Jose A. Rivera Rodriguez

Date: Sep 19, 2003
Clarifying Property Interests in Transitory Public Employment under Law 52: Maria E. Gomez Candelaria v. Jose A. Rivera Rodriguez Introduction The case of Maria E. Gomez Candelaria, et al. v. Jose A....
Expansion of the Discovery Rule in Federal Tort Claims Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Statia A. Skwira v. United States

Expansion of the Discovery Rule in Federal Tort Claims Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Statia A. Skwira v. United States

Date: Sep 16, 2003
Expansion of the Discovery Rule in Federal Tort Claims Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Statia A. Skwira v. United States Introduction In the landmark case Statia A. Skwira, as Administratrix of the...
Remand of Vega-Encarnación's Civil Rights Claim for Further Proceedings

Remand of Vega-Encarnación's Civil Rights Claim for Further Proceedings

Date: Sep 13, 2003
Remand of Vega-Encarnación's Civil Rights Claim for Further Proceedings Introduction The case of Víctor Vega-Encarnación v. Eustaquio Babilonia et al. involves a civil rights complaint filed by...
Arevalo v. Ashcroft: Standard for Stays of Removal and Retroactive Application of IIRIRA's Reinstatement Provision

Arevalo v. Ashcroft: Standard for Stays of Removal and Retroactive Application of IIRIRA's Reinstatement Provision

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Arevalo v. Ashcroft: Standard for Stays of Removal and Retroactive Application of IIRIRA's Reinstatement Provision Introduction Gloria Arevalo, the petitioner, challenged the United States...
Enhanced Standards for Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Retaliation Cases

Enhanced Standards for Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Retaliation Cases

Date: Aug 27, 2003
Enhanced Standards for Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Retaliation Cases Introduction The case of Chungchi Che v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) addressed critical...
Qualified Immunity and Property Interests in Public Employment: Insights from Santana v. Calderón

Qualified Immunity and Property Interests in Public Employment: Insights from Santana v. Calderón

Date: Aug 27, 2003
Qualified Immunity and Property Interests in Public Employment: Insights from Santana v. Calderón Introduction Santana et al. v. Calderón et al., 342 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court’s Discretion in Granting Discharge Amid Procedural and Fifth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on In re Joan E. Carp

Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court’s Discretion in Granting Discharge Amid Procedural and Fifth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on In re Joan E. Carp

Date: Aug 19, 2003
Affirmation of Bankruptcy Court’s Discretion in Granting Discharge Amid Procedural and Fifth Amendment Challenges: A Commentary on In re Joan E. Carp Introduction The case In re Joan E. Carp, Debtor,...
Balancing First Amendment Protections and Employer Interests: An Analysis of Guilloty Perez v. Pierluisi et al.

Balancing First Amendment Protections and Employer Interests: An Analysis of Guilloty Perez v. Pierluisi et al.

Date: Aug 8, 2003
Balancing First Amendment Protections and Employer Interests: An Analysis of Guilloty Perez v. Pierluisi et al. Introduction Guilloty Perez v. Pierluisi et al., 339 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 2003), is a...
Double Jeopardy Protections Under Scrutiny in Jackson v. Coalter

Double Jeopardy Protections Under Scrutiny in Jackson v. Coalter

Date: Jul 29, 2003
Double Jeopardy Protections Under Scrutiny in Jackson v. Coalter Introduction The case of Arthur Jackson, Petitioner, Appellant, v. William Coalter, Respondent, Appellee, reported at 337 F.3d 74,...
Insurer Discretion in ERISA Disability Benefit Terminations Upheld: Boardman v. Prudential

Insurer Discretion in ERISA Disability Benefit Terminations Upheld: Boardman v. Prudential

Date: Jul 24, 2003
Insurer Discretion in ERISA Disability Benefit Terminations Upheld: Boardman v. Prudential Introduction The case of Joyce A. Boardman v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al. (337 F.3d...
Application of the Discovery Rule Under 33 U.S.C. § 913(b)(2): First Circuit Upholds Timely Claim in Bath Iron Works Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

Application of the Discovery Rule Under 33 U.S.C. § 913(b)(2): First Circuit Upholds Timely Claim in Bath Iron Works Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of Labor

Date: Jul 18, 2003
Application of the Discovery Rule Under 33 U.S.C. § 913(b)(2): First Circuit Upholds Timely Claim in Bath Iron Works Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of Labor Introduction In the case of Bath Iron Works Corp.;...
Limits of Brady Obligations and Newly Discovered Evidence in §2255 Petitions: An Analysis of Moreno Morales v. United States

Limits of Brady Obligations and Newly Discovered Evidence in §2255 Petitions: An Analysis of Moreno Morales v. United States

Date: Jul 4, 2003
Limits of Brady Obligations and Newly Discovered Evidence in §2255 Petitions: An Analysis of Moreno Morales v. United States Introduction Moreno Morales v. United States, 334 F.3d 140 (1st Cir....
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat: Balancing First Amendment Rights and Employer Interests

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat: Balancing First Amendment Rights and Employer Interests

Date: Jul 3, 2003
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat: Balancing First Amendment Rights and Employer Interests Introduction Tort Torres-Rosado v. Rotger-Sabat, et al. is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Proper Cause in Hybrid Section 301 Actions Involving Sexual Harassment

Affirmation of Proper Cause in Hybrid Section 301 Actions Involving Sexual Harassment

Date: Jul 3, 2003
Affirmation of Proper Cause in Hybrid Section 301 Actions Involving Sexual Harassment Introduction The case of Martin J. Mulvihill v. The Top-Flite Golf Company, adjudicated by the United States...
ADA Discrimination Protection Affirmed: Failure to Prove Lack of Reasonable Accommodation and Waived Hostile Work Environment Claim

ADA Discrimination Protection Affirmed: Failure to Prove Lack of Reasonable Accommodation and Waived Hostile Work Environment Claim

Date: Jul 1, 2003
ADA Discrimination Protection Affirmed: Failure to Prove Lack of Reasonable Accommodation and Waived Hostile Work Environment Claim Introduction In Orville Rocafort v. IBM Corporation, 334 F.3d 115...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert