Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Res Judicata in Bankruptcy Litigation: Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Lopez-Stubbe

Res Judicata in Bankruptcy Litigation: Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Lopez-Stubbe

Date: Mar 27, 2003
Res Judicata in Bankruptcy Litigation: Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Lopez-Stubbe Introduction The case of Banco Santander De Puerto Rico v. Hans Lopez-Stubbe addresses the intricate application...
BOGOSIAN v. WOLOOHOJIAN Realty: Defining Simple vs. Compound Prejudgment Interest under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.1-90.1

BOGOSIAN v. WOLOOHOJIAN Realty: Defining Simple vs. Compound Prejudgment Interest under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.1-90.1

Date: Mar 20, 2003
BOGOSIAN v. WOLOOHOJIAN Realty: Defining Simple vs. Compound Prejudgment Interest under R.I. Gen. Laws § 7-1.1-90.1 Introduction In Elizabeth V. BOGOSIAN v. WOLOOHOJIAN Realty Corporation, 323 F.3d...
Puerto Rico's Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Maysonet-Robles v. Cabrero

Puerto Rico's Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Maysonet-Robles v. Cabrero

Date: Mar 15, 2003
Puerto Rico's Sovereign Immunity Upheld in Maysonet-Robles v. Cabrero Introduction In the landmark case of Maysonet-Robles et al. v. Cabrero, 323 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 2003), the United States Court of...
Affirming Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect under Rule 60(b)(1): Analysis of Stonkus v. City of Brockton School Department

Affirming Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect under Rule 60(b)(1): Analysis of Stonkus v. City of Brockton School Department

Date: Mar 15, 2003
Affirming Strict Standards for Excusable Neglect under Rule 60(b)(1): Analysis of Stonkus v. City of Brockton School Department Introduction The case of Frances Stonkus, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. City...
Reversal of Class Decertification: Enhancing Rule 23(b)(3) Predominance in Consumer Contract Disputes

Reversal of Class Decertification: Enhancing Rule 23(b)(3) Predominance in Consumer Contract Disputes

Date: Mar 8, 2003
Reversal of Class Decertification: Enhancing Rule 23(b)(3) Predominance in Consumer Contract Disputes Introduction In Smilow v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc., the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Copyright Infringement Verdict in Danielson v. Winchester-Conant Properties

Affirmation of Copyright Infringement Verdict in Danielson v. Winchester-Conant Properties

Date: Mar 7, 2003
Affirmation of Copyright Infringement Verdict in Danielson v. Winchester-Conant Properties Introduction The case of John G. Danielson, Inc. v. Winchester-Conant Properties, Inc. (322 F.3d 26)...
First Circuit Clarifies Arm-of-the-State Test for Eleventh Amendment Immunity in PRCCCC v. FMC

First Circuit Clarifies Arm-of-the-State Test for Eleventh Amendment Immunity in PRCCCC v. FMC

Date: Mar 7, 2003
First Circuit Clarifies Arm-of-the-State Test for Eleventh Amendment Immunity in PRCCCC v. FMC Introduction The case of Fresenius Medical Care Cardiovascular Resources, Inc. (FMC) v. Puerto Rico and...
First Circuit Clarifies Res Judicata and Affirmative Defense Standards in Emotional Distress and Assault Cases

First Circuit Clarifies Res Judicata and Affirmative Defense Standards in Emotional Distress and Assault Cases

Date: Mar 5, 2003
First Circuit Clarifies Res Judicata and Affirmative Defense Standards in Emotional Distress and Assault Cases Introduction In the case of Neal Davignon and Patricia Kelley...
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Discretion in Medical Malpractice Cases: Macaulay v. Anas

Appellate Deference to Trial Court Discretion in Medical Malpractice Cases: Macaulay v. Anas

Date: Mar 1, 2003
Appellate Deference to Trial Court Discretion in Medical Malpractice Cases: Macaulay v. Anas Introduction In the case of Katherine Macaulay, et al. v. Peter P. Anas, M.D., the United States Court of...
First Circuit Reaffirms Presumption Against Permanence in Appropriations Bill Provisions

First Circuit Reaffirms Presumption Against Permanence in Appropriations Bill Provisions

Date: Feb 26, 2003
First Circuit Reaffirms Presumption Against Permanence in Appropriations Bill Provisions Introduction The case of Atlantic Fish Spotters Association v. Donald L. Evans addressed a pivotal issue...
Affirming the Sealing of CJA Eligibility Documents: No First Amendment or Common Law Right of Access

Affirming the Sealing of CJA Eligibility Documents: No First Amendment or Common Law Right of Access

Date: Feb 26, 2003
No Right of Access to CJA Eligibility Documents Under First Amendment or Common Law: A Comprehensive Analysis of In re Boston Herald, Inc. v. Connolly Introduction In the case of In re Boston Herald,...
Prevailing Party Status under IDEA: Insights from Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. and Mrs. R.

Prevailing Party Status under IDEA: Insights from Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. and Mrs. R.

Date: Feb 25, 2003
Prevailing Party Status under IDEA: Insights from Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. and Mrs. R. Introduction The case of Maine School Administrative District No. 35 v. Mr. and Mrs....
Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Sentencing Limitations in U.S. v. Henderson

Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Sentencing Limitations in U.S. v. Henderson

Date: Feb 15, 2003
Reliability of Eyewitness Identification and Sentencing Limitations in United States v. Chamond Henderson Introduction United States v. Chamond Henderson is a significant appellate decision from the...
Standing and Ripeness under the ADA: Insights from McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical Center

Standing and Ripeness under the ADA: Insights from McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical Center

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Standing and Ripeness under the ADA: Insights from McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical Center Introduction In the landmark case of McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical Center, the United States Court of...
Comprehensive Legal Commentary on United States v. Nelson-Rodriguez et al.

Comprehensive Legal Commentary on United States v. Nelson-Rodriguez et al.

Date: Feb 8, 2003
Legal Implications of Wiretap Validity and Sentencing Considerations in United States v. Nelson-Rodriguez et al. Introduction In the case of United States v. Milton A. Nelson-Rodriguez; Luis A....
Affirmance Without Opinion Procedure Under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7): Insights from Albathani v. INS

Affirmance Without Opinion Procedure Under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7): Insights from Albathani v. INS

Date: Feb 7, 2003
Affirmance Without Opinion Procedure Under 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7): Insights from Albathani v. INS Introduction Marwan Youssef Albathani v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), 318 F.3d 365...
Reaffirming the Arbitrary and Capricious Standard under ERISA for Terminating Disability Benefits: Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

Reaffirming the Arbitrary and Capricious Standard under ERISA for Terminating Disability Benefits: Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co.

Date: Feb 6, 2003
Reaffirming the Arbitrary and Capricious Standard under ERISA for Terminating Disability Benefits: Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Co. Introduction Cook v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston,...
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA Time Limits: No Equitable Tolling for Attorney Error in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Strict Enforcement of AEDPA Time Limits: No Equitable Tolling for Attorney Error in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Feb 6, 2003
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA Time Limits: No Equitable Tolling for Attorney Error in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of Stephen David v. Timothy Hall, adjudicated by the United States...
Federal Jurisdiction and Immunity in Telecommunications Regulations: DESTEK GROUP, INC. v. New Hampshire PUC

Federal Jurisdiction and Immunity in Telecommunications Regulations: DESTEK GROUP, INC. v. New Hampshire PUC

Date: Jan 29, 2003
Federal Jurisdiction and Immunity in Telecommunications Regulations: DESTEK GROUP, INC. v. New Hampshire PUC Introduction Case: The DESTEK GROUP, INC., d/b/a The Destek Networking Group, Plaintiff,...
Clarifying the "Sum Certain" Standard under FRCP 55(b)(2): KPS Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc.

Clarifying the "Sum Certain" Standard under FRCP 55(b)(2): KPS Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc.

Date: Jan 29, 2003
Clarifying the "Sum Certain" Standard under FRCP 55(b)(2): KPS Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case KPS Associates, Inc. v. Designs by FMC, Inc., 318 F.3d 1 (1st...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert