Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

DEA Expert Testimony Admissible and Limits on Cumulative Errors Affirmed in Drug Distribution Conviction

DEA Expert Testimony Admissible and Limits on Cumulative Errors Affirmed in Drug Distribution Conviction

Date: Jan 13, 2025
DEA Expert Testimony Admissible and Limits on Cumulative Errors Affirmed in Drug Distribution Conviction Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Reginald Anderson, the United States...
Reaffirming § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Defining “Crime of Violence” for Attempted Bank Robbery

Reaffirming § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Defining “Crime of Violence” for Attempted Bank Robbery

Date: Jan 11, 2025
Reaffirming § 922(g)(1) Post-Bruen and Defining “Crime of Violence” for Attempted Bank Robbery Introduction United States v. James Anthony Brian Morelock (11th Cir. Jan. 10, 2025) addresses three...
Federal Jurisdictional Boundaries for COVID-19 Nursing Home Tort Claims Under the PREP Act

Federal Jurisdictional Boundaries for COVID-19 Nursing Home Tort Claims Under the PREP Act

Date: Jan 11, 2025
Federal Jurisdictional Boundaries for COVID-19 Nursing Home Tort Claims Under the PREP Act Introduction In Matt Holman v. Knollwood Nursing Home, LLC, et al., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Reaffirmation of Specific Acquiescence Standard for CAT Relief and Prejudice Requirement in Motions to Reopen

Reaffirmation of Specific Acquiescence Standard for CAT Relief and Prejudice Requirement in Motions to Reopen

Date: Jan 11, 2025
Reaffirmation of Specific Acquiescence Standard for CAT Relief and Prejudice Requirement in Motions to Reopen Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Nicolas Manbru-Encarnacion v. U.S....
Establishing All Writs Act Injunctions Requires Identical Factual Predicate: Genworth v. TVPX ARS, Inc.

Establishing All Writs Act Injunctions Requires Identical Factual Predicate: Genworth v. TVPX ARS, Inc.

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Establishing All Writs Act Injunctions Requires Identical Factual Predicate: Genworth v. TVPX ARS, Inc. 1. Introduction Genworth Life & Annuity Insurance Company v. TVPX ARS, Inc., 22-11185 (11th...
Circumstantial Possession and 600-Image Enhancement Affirmed: United States v. Snow

Circumstantial Possession and 600-Image Enhancement Affirmed: United States v. Snow

Date: Jan 9, 2025
Circumstantial Possession and 600-Image Enhancement Affirmed: United States v. Snow Introduction United States v. Christopher Snow is a January 8, 2025 decision of the United States Court of Appeals...
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement: Familial Threats Motivated by Financial and Informational Goals Are Insufficient for Asylum Eligibility

Clarifying the Nexus Requirement: Familial Threats Motivated by Financial and Informational Goals Are Insufficient for Asylum Eligibility

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Clarifying the Nexus Requirement: Familial Threats Motivated by Financial and Informational Goals Are Insufficient for Asylum Eligibility Introduction In Maykon De Borba Oliveira v. U.S. Attorney...
Limitations on Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) Enticement Cases

Limitations on Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) Enticement Cases

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Limitations on Expert Testimony Under Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b) in 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) Enticement Cases Introduction United States v. Joshua Herrera is a published Eleventh Circuit decision...
Limits on Reconsideration of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)

Limits on Reconsideration of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d)

Date: Jan 8, 2025
Limits on Reconsideration of Remand Orders under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) Introduction Case: Gregory Brian Myers v. Naples Golf And Beach Club, Inc. Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Expert DEA Agent Testimony and Harmless-Error Standard in Drug Distribution Cases

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Expert DEA Agent Testimony and Harmless-Error Standard in Drug Distribution Cases

Date: Jan 7, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Expert DEA Agent Testimony and Harmless-Error Standard in Drug Distribution Cases Introduction United States v. Reginald Anderson (11th Cir. Jan. 6, 2025) involved the appeal...
Expanding Anti-Kickback Liability to Third-Party Marketers: United States v. Anderson

Expanding Anti-Kickback Liability to Third-Party Marketers: United States v. Anderson

Date: Jan 4, 2025
Expanding Anti-Kickback Liability to Third-Party Marketers: United States v. Anderson Introduction The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in United States v. Nelly Anderson (11th...
United States v. Nelly Anderson: Strengthening Anti-Kickback Enforcement in Medicare Referral Schemes

United States v. Nelly Anderson: Strengthening Anti-Kickback Enforcement in Medicare Referral Schemes

Date: Jan 4, 2025
United States v. Nelly Anderson: Strengthening Anti-Kickback Enforcement in Medicare Referral Schemes Introduction United States v. Nelly Anderson is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Ordinance Restricting Recording in Police Headquarters

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Ordinance Restricting Recording in Police Headquarters

Date: Jan 4, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Ordinance Restricting Recording in Police Headquarters Introduction In the case of Jerry L. Hoffman, Jr. v. Jose Delgado et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Hoffman v. Delgado: Upholding Reasonable Anti-Filming Regulations in Limited Public Forums and the De Minimis Force Doctrine

Hoffman v. Delgado: Upholding Reasonable Anti-Filming Regulations in Limited Public Forums and the De Minimis Force Doctrine

Date: Jan 4, 2025
Hoffman v. Delgado: Upholding Reasonable Anti-Filming Regulations in Limited Public Forums and the De Minimis Force Doctrine Introduction This commentary examines the Eleventh Circuit’s January 3,...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Joseph v. U.S. Attorney General

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Joseph v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jan 3, 2025
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Immigration Appeals: Insights from Joseph v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction The case of Marlissa Alexis Joseph v. U.S. Attorney General adjudicated by the...
Establishing Claim-Processing Exhaustion and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Removal Proceedings

Establishing Claim-Processing Exhaustion and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Removal Proceedings

Date: Jan 3, 2025
Establishing Claim-Processing Exhaustion and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Removal Proceedings Introduction Marlissa Alexis Joseph, a Haitian national and self-identified member of certain...
Affirmation of Plea Validity and Appeal Waiver in UNITED STATES v. Windham

Affirmation of Plea Validity and Appeal Waiver in UNITED STATES v. Windham

Date: Jan 3, 2025
Affirmation of Plea Validity and Appeal Waiver in UNITED STATES v. Windham Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eric Alonzo Windham (22-11622) presents significant deliberations on...
Broad Interpretation of Helms-Burton Act Expands Personal Jurisdiction

Broad Interpretation of Helms-Burton Act Expands Personal Jurisdiction

Date: Jan 3, 2025
Broad Interpretation of Helms-Burton Act Expands Personal Jurisdiction Introduction In the landmark case of North American Sugar Industries, Inc. v. Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd....
Exhaustion as a Claim-Processing Rule and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Withholding and CAT Relief

Exhaustion as a Claim-Processing Rule and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Withholding and CAT Relief

Date: Jan 3, 2025
Exhaustion as a Claim-Processing Rule and Competency Safeguards in Immigration Withholding and CAT Relief Introduction Marlissa Alexis Joseph, a Haitian national, petitioned for review of two Board...
United States v. Windham: Second Plea Hearing as Cure for Judicial Participation Errors and the Breadth of Sentence Appeal Waivers

United States v. Windham: Second Plea Hearing as Cure for Judicial Participation Errors and the Breadth of Sentence Appeal Waivers

Date: Jan 3, 2025
United States v. Windham: Second Plea Hearing as Cure for Judicial Participation Errors and the Breadth of Sentence Appeal Waivers Introduction United States v. Eric Alonzo Windham, No. 22-11622...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert