Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 56(c) Notice in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McBRIDE v. SHARPE

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 56(c) Notice in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McBRIDE v. SHARPE

Date: Jun 22, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 56(c) Notice in Habeas Corpus Petitions: McBRIDE v. SHARPE Introduction The case of Embry Jackson McBride v. Bob Sharpe, Warden, Dodge Correctional...
Reaffirming Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367: Insights from Palmer v. Hospital Authority of Randolph County

Reaffirming Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367: Insights from Palmer v. Hospital Authority of Randolph County

Date: Jun 22, 1994
Reaffirming Supplemental Jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1367: Insights from Palmer v. Hospital Authority of Randolph County Introduction The case of Palmer v. Hospital Authority of Randolph County,...
Admiralty Jurisdiction Affirmed for Vessels in Dry Dock Undergoing Routine Repairs

Admiralty Jurisdiction Affirmed for Vessels in Dry Dock Undergoing Routine Repairs

Date: Jun 21, 1994
Admiralty Jurisdiction Affirmed for Vessels in Dry Dock Undergoing Routine Repairs Introduction The case of In Re the Complaint of the Sea Vessel, Inc. addresses a pivotal issue in admiralty law:...
Early EEOC Right to Sue Letters Do Not Bar Immediate Federal Court Action: Analysis of Sims v. Trus Joist MacMillan

Early EEOC Right to Sue Letters Do Not Bar Immediate Federal Court Action: Analysis of Sims v. Trus Joist MacMillan

Date: Jun 10, 1994
Early EEOC Right to Sue Letters Do Not Bar Immediate Federal Court Action: Analysis of Sims v. Trus Joist MacMillan Introduction John Sims v. Trus Joist MacMillan, 22 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir. 1994), is a...
Affirmation of Neighborhood Standing under the Fair Housing Act in Jackson v. Okaloosa County

Affirmation of Neighborhood Standing under the Fair Housing Act in Jackson v. Okaloosa County

Date: Jun 9, 1994
Affirmation of Neighborhood Standing under the Fair Housing Act in Jackson v. Okaloosa County Introduction Jackson v. Okaloosa County is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Kelly v. Chatham County: Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Claims

Kelly v. Chatham County: Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Claims

Date: Jun 9, 1994
Kelly v. Chatham County: Establishing Limits on Qualified Immunity in False Imprisonment Claims Introduction The case of John Kelly, Jr. v. Chatham County, Georgia (21 F.3d 1544, 1994) presents a...
Jackson v. Veterans Administration: Clarifying 'Otherwise Qualified' Status under Section 504

Jackson v. Veterans Administration: Clarifying 'Otherwise Qualified' Status under Section 504

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Jackson v. Veterans Administration: Clarifying 'Otherwise Qualified' Status under Section 504 Introduction Jackson v. Veterans Administration is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Inclusion of Appeals Council Submitted Evidence in Administrative Record: Keeton v. Department of Health and Human Services

Inclusion of Appeals Council Submitted Evidence in Administrative Record: Keeton v. Department of Health and Human Services

Date: Jun 1, 1994
Inclusion of Appeals Council Submitted Evidence in Administrative Record: Keeton v. Department of Health and Human Services Introduction The case of Keeton v. Department of Health and Human Services,...
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Mandalay Shores: Reevaluating Attorneys' Fees in Interpleader Actions for Innocent Stakeholders

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Mandalay Shores: Reevaluating Attorneys' Fees in Interpleader Actions for Innocent Stakeholders

Date: May 24, 1994
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Mandalay Shores: Reevaluating Attorneys' Fees in Interpleader Actions for Innocent Stakeholders Introduction In Re Mandalay Shores Cooperative Housing Association, Inc.,...
Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference: An Analysis of HARRIS v. COWETA COUNTY

Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference: An Analysis of HARRIS v. COWETA COUNTY

Date: May 24, 1994
Qualified Immunity and Deliberate Indifference: An Analysis of HARRIS v. COWETA COUNTY Introduction The case of Willie G. HARRIS v. COWETA COUNTY serves as a pivotal judicial decision addressing the...
Actual Malice Standard Reinforced in Conditional Privilege Libel Cases: Hammer v. Jaffess

Actual Malice Standard Reinforced in Conditional Privilege Libel Cases: Hammer v. Jaffess

Date: May 19, 1994
Actual Malice Standard Reinforced in Conditional Privilege Libel Cases: Hammer v. Jaffess Introduction In the landmark case Hammer v. Jaffess, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Limiting Copyright Infringement to Protected Expression: Beal v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

Limiting Copyright Infringement to Protected Expression: Beal v. Paramount Pictures Corp.

Date: May 12, 1994
Limiting Copyright Infringement to Protected Expression: Beal v. Paramount Pictures Corporation Introduction The case of Alveda King Beal v. Paramount Pictures Corporation, et al., reported at 20...
Staleness of Affidavit and Sufficiency of Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Harris et al.

Staleness of Affidavit and Sufficiency of Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Harris et al.

Date: May 12, 1994
Staleness of Affidavit and Sufficiency of Evidence in Drug Conspiracy Cases: A Comprehensive Analysis of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Harris et al. Introduction The case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v....
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination Cases: McKINNEY v. PATE

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination Cases: McKINNEY v. PATE

Date: May 6, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Procedural Due Process in Employment Termination Cases: McKINNEY v. PATE Introduction In the landmark case MILLARD McKINNEY v. JOHN PATE, the United States Court of Appeals...
Administrative Expense Priority for Interest on Trade Debts in Bankruptcy: In Re Colortex Industries, Inc. Commentary

Administrative Expense Priority for Interest on Trade Debts in Bankruptcy: In Re Colortex Industries, Inc. Commentary

Date: May 3, 1994
Administrative Expense Priority for Interest on Trade Debts in Bankruptcy: In Re Colortex Industries, Inc. Commentary Introduction In the landmark case of In Re Colortex Industries, Inc., Debt....
United States v. Coy: Single vs. Multiple Conspiracies and the Application of Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Drug Importation

United States v. Coy: Single vs. Multiple Conspiracies and the Application of Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Drug Importation

Date: Apr 28, 1994
United States v. Coy: Single vs. Multiple Conspiracies and the Application of Mandatory Minimum Sentences in Drug Importation Introduction United States of America v. Mary Sue Coy, Joseph Reilly, and...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Continuing Violation Doctrine in FLSA Statute of Limitations

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Continuing Violation Doctrine in FLSA Statute of Limitations

Date: Apr 23, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Continuing Violation Doctrine in FLSA Statute of Limitations Introduction The case of Peter L. Knight, Dennis L. Wall, Michael D. Mulkey, et al. v. Columbus, Georgia...
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in Maritime Contracts: Francosteel Corp. v. M/V Charm

Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in Maritime Contracts: Francosteel Corp. v. M/V Charm

Date: Apr 23, 1994
Limits on Personal Jurisdiction in Maritime Contracts: Francosteel Corp. v. M/V Charm Introduction The case of Francosteel Corporation, Unimetal-Normandy v. M/V Charm, Her Engines, Boilers, Tackle,...
Mulhall v. Advance Security: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Establishment and Affirmative Defense under Equal Pay Act

Mulhall v. Advance Security: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Establishment and Affirmative Defense under Equal Pay Act

Date: Apr 23, 1994
Mulhall v. Advance Security: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Establishment and Affirmative Defense under Equal Pay Act Introduction Mulhall v. Advance Security, Inc., Figgie International, Inc. is...
Original Source Exception in FCA Qui Tam Suits: Cooper v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida

Original Source Exception in FCA Qui Tam Suits: Cooper v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida

Date: Apr 22, 1994
Original Source Exception in FCA Qui Tam Suits: Cooper v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Introduction In the landmark case Cooper v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert