Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under FOIA: Insights from Taylor v. Appleton et al.

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under FOIA: Insights from Taylor v. Appleton et al.

Date: Sep 2, 1994
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under FOIA: Insights from Taylor v. Appleton et al. Introduction The case Charles R. Taylor v. Ed Appleton, Barbara Gutchin, Ken Bachman, Joseph B. Cimilluca,...
Enhancing Free Speech in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Blackston v. State of Alabama

Enhancing Free Speech in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Blackston v. State of Alabama

Date: Sep 1, 1994
Enhancing Free Speech in Judicial Proceedings: Insights from Blackston v. State of Alabama Introduction The case of James Blackston and Bradley Barber v. State of Alabama addressed critical issues...
United States v. Jones: Reassignment Obligations under NHSC Agreements Affirmed by Appellate Court

United States v. Jones: Reassignment Obligations under NHSC Agreements Affirmed by Appellate Court

Date: Aug 31, 1994
United States v. Jones: Reassignment Obligations under NHSC Agreements Affirmed by Appellate Court Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Marvin P. Jones, 29 F.3d 1549 (11th...
Cullen v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Reevaluating Attorney's Fee Calculations in Employment Discrimination Cases

Cullen v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Reevaluating Attorney's Fee Calculations in Employment Discrimination Cases

Date: Aug 26, 1994
Cullen v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Reevaluating Attorney's Fee Calculations in Employment Discrimination Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Bennie Cullens, James Gonder, Larry...
Qualified Immunity in Employment Terminations: The Lassiter v. Alabama A&M University Case

Qualified Immunity in Employment Terminations: The Lassiter v. Alabama A&M University Case

Date: Aug 18, 1994
Qualified Immunity in Employment Terminations: The Lassiter v. Alabama A&M University Precedent Introduction The case of Albert E. Lassiter v. Alabama A&M University addresses the intricate balance...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Bulk Distributor's Duty in Inherently Dangerous Product Cases Under Florida Law

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Bulk Distributor's Duty in Inherently Dangerous Product Cases Under Florida Law

Date: Aug 13, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Bulk Distributor's Duty in Inherently Dangerous Product Cases Under Florida Law 1. Introduction The case of John J. Hunnings, and Wife, Donna Hunnings, individually and as...
Limits of the Best Evidence Rule in Insurance Misrepresentation Claims: Allstate v. Swann

Limits of the Best Evidence Rule in Insurance Misrepresentation Claims: Allstate v. Swann

Date: Aug 10, 1994
Limits of the Best Evidence Rule in Insurance Misrepresentation Claims: Allstate v. Swann Introduction In the landmark case Allstate Insurance Company v. Swann, decided by the United States Court of...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing in Section 1983 Class Actions Against Municipal Policies Targeting the Homeless

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing in Section 1983 Class Actions Against Municipal Policies Targeting the Homeless

Date: Aug 6, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standing in Section 1983 Class Actions Against Municipal Policies Targeting the Homeless Introduction In the landmark case of Joe Church, Gregory Jacobs, Michael Dooly, and...
Duty of Care in Securities Brokerage: Twiss v. Kury Financial Planning Group

Duty of Care in Securities Brokerage: Twiss v. Kury Financial Planning Group

Date: Jul 21, 1994
Duty of Care in Securities Brokerage: Twiss v. Kury Financial Planning Group Introduction Twiss and Sanders v. Kury Financial Planning Group, Inc. and Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc. is a pivotal case...
Federal Rules of Evidence Do Not Apply in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Frazier

Federal Rules of Evidence Do Not Apply in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Frazier

Date: Jul 15, 1994
Federal Rules of Evidence Do Not Apply in Supervised Release Revocation Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Frazier Introduction The case of United States of America v. William Joseph...
Procedural Default and Brady/Giglio Claims in Habeas Corpus: Alderman v. Zant

Procedural Default and Brady/Giglio Claims in Habeas Corpus: Alderman v. Zant

Date: Jul 13, 1994
Procedural Default and Brady/Giglio Claims in Habeas Corpus: Alderman v. Zant Introduction Alderman v. Zant (22 F.3d 1541) is a significant judicial decision rendered by the United States Court of...
Reversal of Eighth Amendment Violation in Prison Cell Stripping Due to Failure to Monitor

Reversal of Eighth Amendment Violation in Prison Cell Stripping Due to Failure to Monitor

Date: Jul 13, 1994
Reversal of Eighth Amendment Violation in Prison Cell Stripping Due to Failure to Monitor Introduction The case of Hardie Vertain Sims, Jr. v. Mashburn et al. (25 F.3d 980) examines the...
Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Weeks v. Jones (11th Cir. 1994)

Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Weeks v. Jones (11th Cir. 1994)

Date: Jul 12, 1994
Affirmation on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Procedural Bar in Weeks v. Jones (11th Cir. 1994) Introduction Weeks v. Jones is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Probable Cause under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): United States v. Miller

Establishing Probable Cause under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): United States v. Miller

Date: Jul 7, 1994
Establishing Probable Cause under 18 U.S.C. § 844(i): United States v. Miller Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Tanfield C. Miller and Helen A. Miller, adjudicated by the...
Disproving Summary Judgment in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims: Insights from Batey v. Secretary of the Army

Disproving Summary Judgment in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims: Insights from Batey v. Secretary of the Army

Date: Jul 6, 1994
Disproving Summary Judgment in Title VII Disparate Treatment Claims: Insights from Batey v. Secretary of the Army Introduction Batey v. Secretary of the Army is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Law Enforcement Executives Reclassified as Non-Exempt Employees Under FLSA due to Improper Salary Deductions in Avery v. City of Talladega

Law Enforcement Executives Reclassified as Non-Exempt Employees Under FLSA due to Improper Salary Deductions in Avery v. City of Talladega

Date: Jul 6, 1994
Law Enforcement Executives Reclassified as Non-Exempt Employees Under FLSA due to Improper Salary Deductions in Avery et al. v. City of Talladega Introduction In the landmark case of Avery et al. v....
Due Process in Workers' Compensation Terminations: Upholding Georgia's Procedural Safeguards

Due Process in Workers' Compensation Terminations: Upholding Georgia's Procedural Safeguards

Date: Jun 30, 1994
Due Process in Workers' Compensation Terminations: Upholding Georgia's Procedural Safeguards Introduction The case of Denise Cryder and James Michael Long v. James Oxendine et al. addressed the...
Abuse of Discretion Standard Affirmed for Section 7430 Cost Awards in IRS Litigation

Abuse of Discretion Standard Affirmed for Section 7430 Cost Awards in IRS Litigation

Date: Jun 30, 1994
Abuse of Discretion Standard Affirmed for Section 7430 Cost Awards in IRS Litigation Introduction The case of In re Billie Vester Rasbury, Debtor involves Billie Vester Rasbury and Bill's Forestry...
International Abstention and Comity: An Analysis of Turner Entertainment Co. v. ARD

International Abstention and Comity: An Analysis of Turner Entertainment Co. v. ARD

Date: Jun 30, 1994
International Abstention and Comity: An Analysis of Turner Entertainment Co. v. ARD Introduction Turner Entertainment Co., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARD Defendants-Appellants is a landmark case...
Federal Civil Forfeiture Preempts State Homestead Protections: Analysis of United States v. Wims

Federal Civil Forfeiture Preempts State Homestead Protections: Analysis of United States v. Wims

Date: Jun 23, 1994
Federal Civil Forfeiture Preempts State Homestead Protections: Analysis of United States v. Wims Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Savanah Wims, decided by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert