Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Hansen v. Sunrise: Implications for First Amendment Claims by Public Employees

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Hansen v. Sunrise: Implications for First Amendment Claims by Public Employees

Date: Apr 22, 1994
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Hansen v. Sunrise: Implications for First Amendment Claims by Public Employees Introduction In the landmark case of Hansen v. Sunrise, 19 F.3d 573 (11th Cir. 1994), the...
Affirmation of Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Executing Judicial Orders: Roland v. Phillips

Affirmation of Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Executing Judicial Orders: Roland v. Phillips

Date: Apr 16, 1994
Affirmation of Absolute Quasi-Judicial Immunity for Law Enforcement Officers in Executing Judicial Orders: Roland v. Phillips. Introduction In the landmark case of Roland v. Phillips, 19 F.3d 552...
Equal Treatment of Bondholders in Class Action Settlements: A Landmark Ruling

Equal Treatment of Bondholders in Class Action Settlements: A Landmark Ruling

Date: Apr 16, 1994
Equal Treatment of Bondholders in Class Action Settlements: A Landmark Ruling Introduction In the realm of financial litigation, the equitable distribution of settlement funds among bondholders is a...
11th Circuit Upholds Civil RICO Liability for Financial Fraud in Jones v. Childers

11th Circuit Upholds Civil RICO Liability for Financial Fraud in Jones v. Childers

Date: Apr 8, 1994
11th Circuit Upholds Civil RICO Liability for Financial Fraud in Jones v. Childers Introduction In the landmark case Gordon Jones and Laura Jones v. John H. Childers and Talent Services, Inc., the...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Union Liability under RICO for Covert Pension Negotiations

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Union Liability under RICO for Covert Pension Negotiations

Date: Apr 6, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Union Liability under RICO for Covert Pension Negotiations Introduction The case of LESLIE RAY COX et al. v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA et al. (17 F.3d 1386)...
Enhancing Defendant Confrontation Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Diaz et al.

Enhancing Defendant Confrontation Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Diaz et al.

Date: Apr 2, 1994
Enhancing Defendant Confrontation Rights in Criminal Proceedings: Insights from United States v. Diaz et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Juan Baptista-Rodriguez, Ramon Calvo,...
Affirmed: State's Voluntary Liability Insurance Trust Does Not Confer Eleventh Amendment Immunity on Individual Employees

Affirmed: State's Voluntary Liability Insurance Trust Does Not Confer Eleventh Amendment Immunity on Individual Employees

Date: Mar 26, 1994
Affirmed: State's Voluntary Liability Insurance Trust Does Not Confer Eleventh Amendment Immunity on Individual Employees Introduction In the landmark case of Gaye Jackson, Barbara Bowens v. Georgia...
Jurisdictional Boundaries on Rule 59(e) Motions in Multi-Defendant Cases: Hertz Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

Jurisdictional Boundaries on Rule 59(e) Motions in Multi-Defendant Cases: Hertz Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car

Date: Mar 22, 1994
Jurisdictional Boundaries on Rule 59(e) Motions in Multi-Defendant Cases: Hertz Corp. v. Alamo Rent-A-Car Introduction In the landmark case Hertz Corporation v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc., decided by the...
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Procedural Barriers and Effective Defense in Capital Habeas Corpus Review

Affirmation of Death Sentence: Procedural Barriers and Effective Defense in Capital Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Mar 12, 1994
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Procedural Barriers and Effective Defense in Capital Habeas Corpus Review Introduction The case of Bernard Bolender, also known as Bernard Bolandor, presents a...
Intentional Discrimination Required Under Title VII: Insights from Meeks v. Computer Associates

Intentional Discrimination Required Under Title VII: Insights from Meeks v. Computer Associates

Date: Mar 8, 1994
Intentional Discrimination Required Under Title VII: Insights from Meeks v. Computer Associates Introduction Meeks v. Computer Associates International, 15 F.3d 1013 (11th Cir. 1994), is a seminal...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Hairston v. Gainesville Sun

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Hairston v. Gainesville Sun

Date: Feb 17, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Summary Judgment in ADEA Retaliation Claims: Hairston v. Gainesville Sun Introduction Hairston v. Gainesville Sun Publishing Co. is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of Theft Convictions in Garcia and Chaves: Implications on Sentencing Enhancements and Evidence Admissibility

Affirmation of Theft Convictions in Garcia and Chaves: Implications on Sentencing Enhancements and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Feb 11, 1994
Affirmation of Theft Convictions in Garcia and Chaves: Implications on Sentencing Enhancements and Evidence Admissibility Introduction The appellate decision in United States of America v. Angel...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Constructive Trusts in Fraud Cases: Adequate Legal Remedies Limit Equitable Relief

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Constructive Trusts in Fraud Cases: Adequate Legal Remedies Limit Equitable Relief

Date: Feb 10, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Constructive Trusts in Fraud Cases: Adequate Legal Remedies Limit Equitable Relief Introduction The case of Mitsubishi International Corporation v. Cardinal Textile Sales,...
Balancing Intimate Association Rights Against Employer's Confidentiality Interests: McCabe v. Sharrett

Balancing Intimate Association Rights Against Employer's Confidentiality Interests: McCabe v. Sharrett

Date: Feb 8, 1994
Balancing Intimate Association Rights Against Employer's Confidentiality Interests: McCabe v. Sharrett Introduction McCabe v. Sharrett is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Rule 37 Sanctions Without Willfulness in BankAtlantic v. Paine Webber

Affirmation of Rule 37 Sanctions Without Willfulness in BankAtlantic v. Paine Webber

Date: Feb 1, 1994
Affirmation of Rule 37 Sanctions Without Willfulness in BankAtlantic v. Paine Webber Introduction The case of BankAtlantic, A Federal Savings Bank f/k/a Atlantic Federal Savings Loan Association of...
Rogers v. Zant: Upholding Defense Counsel’s Discretion in Strategic Defense Decisions

Rogers v. Zant: Upholding Defense Counsel’s Discretion in Strategic Defense Decisions

Date: Jan 22, 1994
Rogers v. Zant: Upholding Defense Counsel’s Discretion in Strategic Defense Decisions Introduction Rogers v. Zant, 13 F.3d 384 (11th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case in the realm of criminal defense...
Limits on Collateral Challenges to Prior Convictions under ACCA: Medlock v. United States

Limits on Collateral Challenges to Prior Convictions under ACCA: Medlock v. United States

Date: Jan 22, 1994
Limits on Collateral Challenges to Prior Convictions under ACCA: Medlock v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Robert Clay Medlock, 12 F.3d 185 (11th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case...
Reaffirmation of HCFA's Interpretation of Medicaid Income Eligibility: Inclusion of Withheld Social Security Benefits

Reaffirmation of HCFA's Interpretation of Medicaid Income Eligibility: Inclusion of Withheld Social Security Benefits

Date: Jan 22, 1994
Reaffirmation of HCFA's Interpretation of Medicaid Income Eligibility: Inclusion of Withheld Social Security Benefits Introduction In The State of Georgia, Department of Medical Assistance, by and...
Survival of Qui Tam Actions Under the False Claims Act: Insights from United States of America v. NEC Corporation

Survival of Qui Tam Actions Under the False Claims Act: Insights from United States of America v. NEC Corporation

Date: Jan 13, 1994
Survival of Qui Tam Actions Under the False Claims Act: Insights from United States of America v. NEC Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. NEC Corporation et...
Postconfirmation Default Cure Under Chapter 13: Green Tree Acceptance v. Hoggle et al.

Postconfirmation Default Cure Under Chapter 13: Green Tree Acceptance v. Hoggle et al.

Date: Jan 12, 1994
Postconfirmation Default Cure Under Chapter 13: Green Tree Acceptance v. Hoggle et al. Introduction The case Green Tree Acceptance, Inc. v. Teresa Jo Hoggle et al., decided by the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert