Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Walker v. Jones: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial and Procedural Defaults in Federal Appeals

Walker v. Jones: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial and Procedural Defaults in Federal Appeals

Date: Jan 8, 1994
Walker v. Jones: Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Denial and Procedural Defaults in Federal Appeals Introduction Walker v. Jones, 10 F.3d 1569 (11th Cir. 1994), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Successorship Doctrine in Labor Law – Independent Sprinkler Corp. v. Road Sprinkler Fitters Local No. 669

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Successorship Doctrine in Labor Law – Independent Sprinkler Corp. v. Road Sprinkler Fitters Local No. 669

Date: Jan 8, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scope of Successorship Doctrine in Labor Law – Independent Sprinkler Corp. v. Road Sprinkler Fitters Local No. 669 Introduction The case of Road Sprinkler Fitters Local...
Deliberate Indifference and Jail Suicides: Analyzing Tittle v. Jefferson County Comm'n

Deliberate Indifference and Jail Suicides: Analyzing Tittle v. Jefferson County Comm'n

Date: Jan 7, 1994
Deliberate Indifference and Jail Suicides: Analyzing Tittle v. Jefferson County Comm'n Introduction Tittle v. Jefferson County Comm'n is a significant case decided by the United States Court of...
Contra Proferentem Applied to ERISA Plan Ambiguities in Healthcare Coverage – Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama

Contra Proferentem Applied to ERISA Plan Ambiguities in Healthcare Coverage – Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama

Date: Jan 7, 1994
Contra Proferentem Applied to ERISA Plan Ambiguities in Healthcare Coverage – Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama Introduction Lee v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama is a pivotal case...
De Novo Review Standard Established for ERISA Disability Benefit Denials in Kirwan v. Marriott Corporation

De Novo Review Standard Established for ERISA Disability Benefit Denials in Kirwan v. Marriott Corporation

Date: Jan 5, 1994
De Novo Review Standard Established for ERISA Disability Benefit Denials in Kirwan v. Marriott Corporation Introduction The case of Gary Kirwan v. Marriott Corporation represents a pivotal moment in...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Attorney's Fees in Extensive Fee Applications

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Attorney's Fees in Extensive Fee Applications

Date: Jan 5, 1994
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Standards for Attorney's Fees in Extensive Fee Applications Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit issued a pivotal decision on January 4,...
Forney v. United States: Upholding Prosecutorial Discretion in Sentencing

Forney v. United States: Upholding Prosecutorial Discretion in Sentencing

Date: Dec 28, 1993
Forney v. United States: Upholding Prosecutorial Discretion in Sentencing Introduction In United States of America v. Mark Forney, 9 F.3d 1492 (11th Cir. 1993), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Deliberate Ignorance and Evidentiary Admissibility: Insights from United States v. James W. Stone

Deliberate Ignorance and Evidentiary Admissibility: Insights from United States v. James W. Stone

Date: Dec 23, 1993
Deliberate Ignorance and Evidentiary Admissibility: Insights from United States v. James W. Stone Introduction United States v. James W. Stone, 9 F.3d 934 (11th Cir. 1993), serves as a pivotal case...
Establishing Final Judgment Requirements for EAJA Applications in Social Security Cases: Insights from Newsome v. Shalala

Establishing Final Judgment Requirements for EAJA Applications in Social Security Cases: Insights from Newsome v. Shalala

Date: Dec 8, 1993
Establishing Final Judgment Requirements for EAJA Applications in Social Security Cases: Insights from Newsome v. Shalala Introduction Newsome v. Shalala, 8 F.3d 775 (11th Cir. 1993), is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Default Judgment Due to Lack of Diligence Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b): Florida Physician's Insurance Co. v. Ehlers

Affirmation of Default Judgment Due to Lack of Diligence Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b): Florida Physician's Insurance Co. v. Ehlers

Date: Dec 8, 1993
Affirmation of Default Judgment Due to Lack of Diligence Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b): Florida Physician's Insurance Co. v. Ehlers Introduction Florida Physician's Insurance Company,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Market Definition and Dangerous Probability in Antitrust: U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Market Definition and Dangerous Probability in Antitrust: U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc.

Date: Nov 24, 1993
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Market Definition and Dangerous Probability in Antitrust: U.S. Anchor Mfg., Inc. v. Rule Industries, Inc. (7 F.3d 986, 1993) Introduction In the landmark case U.S. Anchor...
Enforcement of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from TOWER v. PHILLIPS

Enforcement of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from TOWER v. PHILLIPS

Date: Nov 18, 1993
Enforcement of Procedural Bars in Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings: Insights from TOWER v. PHILLIPS Introduction Terry Brian Tower v. O.J. Phillips is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Equitable Tolling Limitations in Admiralty Law: Roger Justice v. United States

Equitable Tolling Limitations in Admiralty Law: Roger Justice v. United States

Date: Nov 16, 1993
Equitable Tolling Limitations in Admiralty Law: Roger Justice v. United States Introduction The case of Roger Justice v. United States addresses the contentious issue of whether the doctrine of...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale Introduction The case of Sandra Post and Abilio Lirio v. City of Fort Lauderdale presents a pivotal examination of...
Defining Public Concern in Retaliation Claims: Morgan v. Ford et al.

Defining Public Concern in Retaliation Claims: Morgan v. Ford et al.

Date: Nov 10, 1993
Defining Public Concern in Retaliation Claims: Morgan v. Ford et al. Introduction In Morgan v. Ford et al., the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed significant issues...
Establishing the Bounds of Sovereign Immunity: Kitchen v. CSX Transportation et al.

Establishing the Bounds of Sovereign Immunity: Kitchen v. CSX Transportation et al.

Date: Nov 9, 1993
Establishing the Bounds of Sovereign Immunity: Kitchen v. CSX Transportation et al. Introduction Kitchen v. CSX Transportation et al. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing State Action in Ballot Access: Analysis of DUKE v. CLELAND

Establishing State Action in Ballot Access: Analysis of DUKE v. CLELAND

Date: Oct 30, 1993
Establishing State Action in Ballot Access: Analysis of DUKE v. CLELAND Introduction DUKE v. CLELAND, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on October 29, 1993,...
Affirmation of Federal Redistricting Orders: Res Judicata and Injunctions under the Voting Rights Act in Wesch v. Alabama Democratic Party

Affirmation of Federal Redistricting Orders: Res Judicata and Injunctions under the Voting Rights Act in Wesch v. Alabama Democratic Party

Date: Oct 28, 1993
Affirmation of Federal Redistricting Orders: Res Judicata and Injunctions under the Voting Rights Act in Wesch v. Alabama Democratic Party Introduction Wesch v. Alabama Democratic Party is a pivotal...
Establishing Non-Dischargeability Through Statutory Fiduciary Duty: Quaif v. Johnson

Establishing Non-Dischargeability Through Statutory Fiduciary Duty: Quaif v. Johnson

Date: Oct 20, 1993
Establishing Non-Dischargeability Through Statutory Fiduciary Duty: Quaif v. Johnson Introduction The case Alan S. Quaif v. Jeffrey Johnson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Enforcing Mandatory Redemption and Reaffirmation in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Taylor v. AGE Federal Credit Union

Enforcing Mandatory Redemption and Reaffirmation in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Taylor v. AGE Federal Credit Union

Date: Oct 14, 1993
Enforcing Mandatory Redemption and Reaffirmation in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy: Taylor v. AGE Federal Credit Union Introduction The case of In re Warren L. Taylor, Jr., Cathy L. Taylor, Debtors vs. AGE...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert