Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Waiver of Delivery Date Under UCC in BMC Industries v. Barth Industries

Waiver of Delivery Date Under UCC in BMC Industries v. Barth Industries

Date: Nov 19, 1998
Waiver of Delivery Date Under UCC in BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc. Introduction BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Equitable Tolling in Truth in Lending Act: Ellis v. GMAC

Equitable Tolling in Truth in Lending Act: Ellis v. GMAC

Date: Nov 14, 1998
Equitable Tolling in the Truth in Lending Act: An Analysis of Ellis v. GMAC Introduction Paul R. Ellis and Peggy Ann Ellis ("Ellises") filed a lawsuit against General Motors Acceptance Corporation...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Detailed Prior Convictions for Witness Impeachment: United States v. Burston

Clarifying the Admissibility of Detailed Prior Convictions for Witness Impeachment: United States v. Burston

Date: Nov 7, 1998
Clarifying the Admissibility of Detailed Prior Convictions for Witness Impeachment: United States v. Burston Introduction United States of America v. Terry Lewis Burston is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA: Analysis of Alexander v. Hawk

Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the PLRA: Analysis of Alexander v. Hawk

Date: Nov 6, 1998
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act: Analysis of Alexander v. Hawk Introduction The landmark case of Michael Alexander v. Kathleen Hawk, adjudicated...
Sanctions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927: An Analysis of Barnes v. Dalton

Sanctions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927: An Analysis of Barnes v. Dalton

Date: Oct 30, 1998
Sanctions Under 28 U.S.C. § 1927: An Analysis of Barnes v. Dalton Introduction The case of Sammy D. Barnes and Ray C. Dunlin, et al. v. John H. Dalton, Secretary, Department of the Navy serves as a...
Reaffirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Walker v. Mortham

Reaffirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Walker v. Mortham

Date: Oct 29, 1998
Reaffirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Walker v. Mortham Introduction In Walker v. Mortham, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Price-Fixing Conspiracy in the Chlorine Market: Comprehensive Analysis of City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.

Price-Fixing Conspiracy in the Chlorine Market: Comprehensive Analysis of City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.

Date: Oct 24, 1998
Price-Fixing Conspiracy in the Chlorine Market: Comprehensive Analysis of City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of City of Tuscaloosa; Municipal Utilities...
Ability to Pay Must Be Considered in Rule 11 Sanctions Awards: Analysis of Baker v. Dandar

Ability to Pay Must Be Considered in Rule 11 Sanctions Awards: Analysis of Baker v. Dandar

Date: Oct 20, 1998
Ability to Pay Must Be Considered in Rule 11 Sanctions Awards: Analysis of Baker v. Dandar Introduction Baker v. Dandar is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Harbert International v. Fob James

Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Harbert International v. Fob James

Date: Oct 15, 1998
Eleventh Amendment and Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Harbert International v. Fob James Introduction Harbert International, Inc., a construction company, filed a lawsuit against several Alabama...
Clarifying the Boundaries of Absolute Pollution Exclusions: Technical Coating Applicators v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Clarifying the Boundaries of Absolute Pollution Exclusions: Technical Coating Applicators v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co.

Date: Oct 10, 1998
Clarifying the Boundaries of Absolute Pollution Exclusions: Technical Coating Applicators v. U.S. Fidelity and Guaranty Co. Introduction The case of Technical Coating Applicators, Inc. v. United...
11th Circuit Reinforces Standards for Habeas Corpus Relief in Death Penalty Cases

11th Circuit Reinforces Standards for Habeas Corpus Relief in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Sep 23, 1998
11th Circuit Reinforces Standards for Habeas Corpus Relief in Death Penalty Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Terry Melvin Sims v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr., decided on September 22, 1998,...
Federal-Question Jurisdiction in ADA Discrimination Claims: Insights from Jairath v. Dyer

Federal-Question Jurisdiction in ADA Discrimination Claims: Insights from Jairath v. Dyer

Date: Sep 17, 1998
Federal-Question Jurisdiction in ADA Discrimination Claims: Insights from Jairath v. Dyer Introduction The case of Vimal Jairath v. Wallace K. Dyer, Dr., M.D., decided by the United States Court of...
Limits on Fraudulent Joinder in Class Action Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Triggs v. World Omni Financial Corp.

Limits on Fraudulent Joinder in Class Action Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Triggs v. World Omni Financial Corp.

Date: Sep 17, 1998
Limits on Fraudulent Joinder in Class Action Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Triggs v. World Omni Financial Corp. 1. Introduction Triggs v. World Omni Financial Corp. is a pivotal case...
Bankruptcy Courts' Authority to Scrutinize Prior Consent Judgments for Fraudulent Transfers: In Re XYZ Options, Inc.

Bankruptcy Courts' Authority to Scrutinize Prior Consent Judgments for Fraudulent Transfers: In Re XYZ Options, Inc.

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Bankruptcy Courts' Authority to Scrutinize Prior Consent Judgments for Fraudulent Transfers: In Re XYZ Options, Inc. Introduction In the appellate case In Re: XYZ Options, Inc., Debtor, the United...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Convictions While Remanding Sentencing Adjustments

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Convictions While Remanding Sentencing Adjustments

Date: Sep 15, 1998
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Convictions While Remanding Sentencing Adjustments Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ronald Glinton et al., the United States Court...
Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy Discharge Cases Involving Securities Fraud: Insights from SEC v. Bilzerian

Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy Discharge Cases Involving Securities Fraud: Insights from SEC v. Bilzerian

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Collateral Estoppel in Bankruptcy Discharge Cases Involving Securities Fraud: Insights from SEC v. Bilzerian Introduction The case of In re: Paul A. Bilzerian, Debtor vs. Securities and Exchange...
Garrity-Protected Statements and Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Veal et al.

Garrity-Protected Statements and Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Veal et al.

Date: Sep 5, 1998
Garrity-Protected Statements and Obstruction of Justice: United States v. Veal et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Nathaniel Veal, Jr., Andy Watson, Pablo Camacho,...
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Baldwin v. Johnson

Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Baldwin v. Johnson

Date: Sep 2, 1998
Affirmation of Procedural Defaults and Ineffective Assistance Standards in Baldwin v. Johnson Introduction Baldwin v. Johnson, 152 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1998), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Strict Standards for Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from GOLD v. CITY OF MIAMI

Strict Standards for Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from GOLD v. CITY OF MIAMI

Date: Aug 28, 1998
Strict Standards for Municipal Liability Under Section 1983: Insights from GOLD v. CITY OF MIAMI Introduction GOLD v. CITY OF MIAMI, 151 F.3d 1346 (11th Cir. 1998), serves as a pivotal case in...
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Federal Tort Claims Act Case

Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Federal Tort Claims Act Case

Date: Aug 27, 1998
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Government Immunity in Federal Tort Claims Act Case Introduction In the landmark case of William Cohen v. United States of America, 151 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert