Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Scrutiny on Attorney Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Barnes v. ACLU of Georgia

Strict Scrutiny on Attorney Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Barnes v. ACLU of Georgia

Date: Feb 24, 1999
Strict Scrutiny on Attorney Fee Awards under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Barnes v. ACLU of Georgia Introduction Case Title: American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia; The AIDS Survival Project; et al.,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Subject Matter Jurisdiction in University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Company

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Subject Matter Jurisdiction in University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Company

Date: Feb 23, 1999
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Subject Matter Jurisdiction in University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Company Introduction The case of University of South Alabama, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus The...
Women Recognized as a Protected Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) in Employment Discrimination

Women Recognized as a Protected Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) in Employment Discrimination

Date: Feb 12, 1999
Women Recognized as a Protected Class under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) in Employment Discrimination Introduction In the landmark case of Shari L. LYES v. CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, et al., adjudicated...
Plea Agreement Waiver of Appeal Remains Binding Despite District Court’s Encouragement to Appeal

Plea Agreement Waiver of Appeal Remains Binding Despite District Court’s Encouragement to Appeal

Date: Feb 6, 1999
Enforceability of Waiver of Appeal in Plea Agreements Despite District Court’s Encouragement to Appeal Introduction The appeal in UNITED STATES of America v. James D. Howle addresses a pivotal issue...
Limits on Amending Complaints: Affirming Denial of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Campbell v. Emory Clinic

Limits on Amending Complaints: Affirming Denial of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Campbell v. Emory Clinic

Date: Feb 5, 1999
Limits on Amending Complaints: Affirming Denial of Fiduciary Duty Claims in Campbell v. Emory Clinic Introduction In the landmark case of Campbell v. Emory Clinic (166 F.3d 1157, 1999), the United...
Enforcement of Merger Clauses and General Releases in Federal Securities Fraud Claims: Mergens v. Dreyfoos

Enforcement of Merger Clauses and General Releases in Federal Securities Fraud Claims: Mergens v. Dreyfoos

Date: Feb 4, 1999
Enforcement of Merger Clauses and General Releases in Federal Securities Fraud Claims: Mergens v. Dreyfoos Introduction The case of Ann A. Mergens, individually, and as Trustee for the Ann A. Mergens...
Clarifying Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representation: FREUND v. BUTTERWORTH

Clarifying Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representation: FREUND v. BUTTERWORTH

Date: Jan 23, 1999
Clarifying Conflict of Interest in Successive Legal Representation: FREUND v. BUTTERWORTH Introduction In the landmark case of John S. Freund v. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, decided by...
Joint Criminal Objective Essential for Conspiracy Conviction: United States v. Dekle

Joint Criminal Objective Essential for Conspiracy Conviction: United States v. Dekle

Date: Jan 22, 1999
Joint Criminal Objective Essential for Conspiracy Conviction: United States v. Dekle Introduction United States of America v. Andrew Allison Dekle, M.D., 165 F.3d 826 (11th Cir. 1999), presents a...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Case Under Title VII

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Case Under Title VII

Date: Jan 15, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment Case Under Title VII Introduction The case of Vickie K. COATES v. SUNDOR BRANDS, INC., and Emmett E. Long (164 F.3d 1361)...
Rule 11 Proceedings and Consecutive Sentences: Insights from Humphrey v. United States

Rule 11 Proceedings and Consecutive Sentences: Insights from Humphrey v. United States

Date: Jan 7, 1999
Rule 11 Proceedings and Consecutive Sentences: Insights from Humphrey v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America v. Patrick Lamar Humphrey, 164 F.3d 585 (11th Cir. 1999),...
Qualified Immunity Upholding in Confinement Condition Claims: Wilson v. Blankenhip

Qualified Immunity Upholding in Confinement Condition Claims: Wilson v. Blankenhip

Date: Jan 1, 1999
Qualified Immunity Upholding in Confinement Condition Claims: Donald Wilson v. Blankenhip Introduction The case of Donald Wilson v. Blankenhip, Warden of Montgomery City Jail, et al. (163 F.3d 1284)...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Cases: Insights from Lockard v. Equifax

Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Cases: Insights from Lockard v. Equifax

Date: Jan 1, 1999
Jurisdictional Boundaries in FCRA Cases: Insights from Lockard v. Equifax Introduction In William D. Lockard v. Equifax, Inc., decided on December 31, 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Employer Liability Under Title VII for Employee Harassment: Analysis of Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Inc.

Employer Liability Under Title VII for Employee Harassment: Analysis of Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Inc.

Date: Dec 29, 1998
Employer Liability Under Title VII for Employee Harassment: Analysis of Llampallas v. Mini-Circuits, Inc. Introduction The case of Elba Llampallas, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mini-Circuits, Inc. presents...
Overt Acts Must Constitute Racketeering Activity in Civil RICO Conspiracy Claims: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent

Overt Acts Must Constitute Racketeering Activity in Civil RICO Conspiracy Claims: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent

Date: Dec 16, 1998
Overt Acts Must Constitute Racketeering Activity in Civil RICO Conspiracy Claims: Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent Introduction The case of Robert A. Beck, II v. Ronald M. Pruipis et al., decided by...
Affirming Judgment as a Matter of Law in Age Discrimination Case and Limiting Appeals on Rule 11 Sanctions: Bogle v. Orange County

Affirming Judgment as a Matter of Law in Age Discrimination Case and Limiting Appeals on Rule 11 Sanctions: Bogle v. Orange County

Date: Dec 10, 1998
Affirming Judgment as a Matter of Law in Age Discrimination Case and Limiting Appeals on Rule 11 Sanctions: Bogle v. Orange County 1. Introduction The case of William J. Bogle v. Orange County Board...
Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(8) in United States v. Cunningham

Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(8) in United States v. Cunningham

Date: Dec 5, 1998
Congressional Authority Under the Commerce Clause: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §922(g)(8) in United States v. Cunningham Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Ivan Russell Cunningham,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Employment Discrimination Case: Alan K. Standard, Jr. v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc. et al.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Employment Discrimination Case: Alan K. Standard, Jr. v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc. et al.

Date: Dec 4, 1998
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Employment Discrimination Case: Alan K. Standard, Jr. v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc. et al. Introduction The case of Alan K. Standard, Jr. v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc.,...
Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under the Fair Housing Act

Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under the Fair Housing Act

Date: Dec 3, 1998
Qualified Immunity in Retaliation Claims under the Fair Housing Act Introduction In the landmark case of LUZ GONZALEZ vs. LEE COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Jury Override in Capital Sentencing: Upholding Procedural Safeguards

Jury Override in Capital Sentencing: Upholding Procedural Safeguards

Date: Dec 2, 1998
Jury Override in Capital Sentencing: Upholding Procedural Safeguards Introduction The case of Gregory Mills v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Duren v. Hopper: Upholding Strict Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Capital Sentencing

Duren v. Hopper: Upholding Strict Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Capital Sentencing

Date: Nov 21, 1998
Duren v. Hopper: Upholding Strict Strickland Standards for Ineffective Assistance in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Duren v. Hopper, 161 F.3d 655 (11th Cir. 1998), the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert