Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Maniccia v. Brown: Upholding Strict Criteria for Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Under Title VII

Maniccia v. Brown: Upholding Strict Criteria for Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Under Title VII

Date: Apr 10, 1999
Maniccia v. Brown: Upholding Strict Criteria for Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Under Title VII Introduction Maniccia v. Brown, 171 F.3d 1364 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Appellate Review of Remand Orders Enforcing Forum Selection Clauses: Snapper, Inc. v. Redan

Appellate Review of Remand Orders Enforcing Forum Selection Clauses: Snapper, Inc. v. Redan

Date: Apr 6, 1999
Appellate Review of Remand Orders Enforcing Forum Selection Clauses: Snapper, Inc. v. Redan Introduction Snapper, Inc. v. Redan is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing Probable Cause Without Independent Police Corroboration: Insights from United States v. Brundidge

Establishing Probable Cause Without Independent Police Corroboration: Insights from United States v. Brundidge

Date: Apr 3, 1999
Establishing Probable Cause Without Independent Police Corroboration: Insights from United States v. Brundidge Introduction United States of America v. Chancey Wade Brundidge (170 F.3d 1350),...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings: Insights from In re TOLEDO and TOLEDO v. Sanchez

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings: Insights from In re TOLEDO and TOLEDO v. Sanchez

Date: Apr 3, 1999
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Bankruptcy Adversary Proceedings: Insights from In re Orlando TOLEDO and Maria Toledo, Debtors. Continental National Bank of Miami v. Carmen Sanchez Introduction The case...
Establishing Constitutional Limits on Punitive Damages: Insights from Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Establishing Constitutional Limits on Punitive Damages: Insights from Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Establishing Constitutional Limits on Punitive Damages: Insights from Johansen v. Combustion Engineering, Inc. Introduction Cheryl Maloof Johansen, et al. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., decided by...
Constitutionality of Yard Suspension List Procedures Affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit

Constitutionality of Yard Suspension List Procedures Affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Constitutionality of Yard Suspension List Procedures Affirmed by the Eleventh Circuit Introduction In the landmark case of Frankie Lee Bass and Leonard Bean v. Perse, heard by the United States Court...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLLIER v. TURPIN

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLLIER v. TURPIN

Date: Mar 30, 1999
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: COLLIER v. TURPIN Introduction COLLIER v. TURPIN, 177 F.3d 1184 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case in the realm of capital punishment and the...
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Sullivan v. Amtrak

Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Sullivan v. Amtrak

Date: Mar 27, 1999
Eleventh Circuit Sets Precedent on Retaliation Claims under Title VII: Sullivan v. Amtrak Introduction In the landmark case BARRY T. SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Ambiguous Habitual-Violent-Felony Statutes: Smith v. Singletary

Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Ambiguous Habitual-Violent-Felony Statutes: Smith v. Singletary

Date: Mar 26, 1999
Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Context of Ambiguous Habitual-Violent-Felony Statutes: Smith v. Singletary Introduction In Smith v. Singletary, 170 F.3d 1051 (11th Cir. 1999), the United...
Deliberate Indifference and Excessive Force in Prisoner's Rights: Campbell v. Sikes (1999)

Deliberate Indifference and Excessive Force in Prisoner's Rights: Campbell v. Sikes (1999)

Date: Mar 20, 1999
Deliberate Indifference and Excessive Force in Prisoner's Rights: Campbell v. Sikes (1999) Introduction Campbell v. Sikes, 169 F.3d 1353 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case addressing the application...
Procedural Default and Brady Compliance Affirmed in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Procedural Default and Brady Compliance Affirmed in Federal Habeas Corpus Review

Date: Mar 11, 1999
Procedural Default and Brady Compliance Affirmed in Federal Habeas Corpus Review Introduction FREDDIE LEE WRIGHT, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted and sentenced to death for the robbery and...
Public Officials as Non-Employers under FMLA: Eleventh Circuit Sets New Precedent

Public Officials as Non-Employers under FMLA: Eleventh Circuit Sets New Precedent

Date: Mar 10, 1999
Public Officials as Non-Employers under FMLA: Eleventh Circuit Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of Rosemary J. Wascura v. Neil Carver et al. (169 F.3d 683) is a landmark decision by the...
Chaves v. United States: Defining Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Commercial Settings and Upholding Admissibility of Evidence from Independent Sources

Chaves v. United States: Defining Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Commercial Settings and Upholding Admissibility of Evidence from Independent Sources

Date: Mar 10, 1999
Chaves v. United States: Defining Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Commercial Settings and Upholding Admissibility of Evidence from Independent Sources Introduction Chaves v. United States (169...
Implied Covenant Requires Breach of Express Terms: Burger King Corp. v. Weaver

Implied Covenant Requires Breach of Express Terms: Burger King Corp. v. Weaver

Date: Mar 10, 1999
Implied Covenant Requires Breach of Express Terms: Burger King Corp. v. Weaver Introduction In the case of Burger King Corporation (BKC) v. C.R. Weaver; M-W-M, Inc., decided on March 9, 1999, by the...
Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts: Vencor Hospitals v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island

Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts: Vencor Hospitals v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island

Date: Mar 9, 1999
Third-Party Beneficiary Rights in Insurance Contracts: Vencor Hospitals v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Rhode Island Introduction The case of Vencor Hospitals d.b.a. Vencor Hospital v. Blue Cross Blue...
Montgomery v. Noga: Strengthening Software Copyright and 
    False Designation of Origin Protections

Montgomery v. Noga: Strengthening Software Copyright and False Designation of Origin Protections

Date: Mar 6, 1999
Montgomery v. Noga: Strengthening Software Copyright and False Designation of Origin Protections Introduction In Robert Montgomery v. Rebecca Noga and Florida Lion's Den, Inc., 168 F.3d 1282 (11th...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment on Race Discrimination, Reversal on Gender Discrimination in Schoenfeld v. Babbitt

Affirmation of Summary Judgment on Race Discrimination, Reversal on Gender Discrimination in Schoenfeld v. Babbitt

Date: Mar 5, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment on Race Discrimination, Reversal on Gender Discrimination in Schoenfeld v. Babbitt Introduction In Paul Schoenfeld v. Bruce Babbitt, decided by the United States Court...
Establishing Notice Adequacy under the Federal Tort Claims Act: The Boyd Burchfield Decision

Establishing Notice Adequacy under the Federal Tort Claims Act: The Boyd Burchfield Decision

Date: Mar 3, 1999
Establishing Notice Adequacy under the Federal Tort Claims Act: The Boyd Burchfield Decision Introduction In Boyd Burchfield v. United States of America, Department of Veteran Affairs, decided by the...
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Plea Agreements in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Matthews et al.

Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Plea Agreements in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Matthews et al.

Date: Mar 2, 1999
Affirmation of Sentencing Guidelines and Plea Agreements in Drug Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Matthews et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Clennon Matthews, a.k.a. "Big...
Intentional Race-Based Job Assignments Constitute Violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Ferrill v. The Parker Group, Inc.

Intentional Race-Based Job Assignments Constitute Violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Ferrill v. The Parker Group, Inc.

Date: Feb 27, 1999
Intentional Race-Based Job Assignments Constitute Violation of 42 U.S.C. §1981: Analysis of Ferrill v. The Parker Group, Inc. Introduction Ferrill v. The Parker Group, Inc., 168 F.3d 468 (11th Cir....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert