Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Wofford v. Scott: Defining the Limits of Habeas Corpus Relief under §2255's Savings Clause

Wofford v. Scott: Defining the Limits of Habeas Corpus Relief under §2255's Savings Clause

Date: Jun 15, 1999
Wofford v. Scott: Defining the Limits of Habeas Corpus Relief under §2255's Savings Clause Introduction In Charlie F. Wofford v. Willie Scott, 177 F.3d 1236 (11th Cir. 1999), the United States Court...
Enforcing Arbitration for Non-Signatory Third Parties Through Equitable Estoppel: MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Sharon D. Franklin

Enforcing Arbitration for Non-Signatory Third Parties Through Equitable Estoppel: MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Sharon D. Franklin

Date: May 29, 1999
Enforcing Arbitration for Non-Signatory Third Parties Through Equitable Estoppel: MS Dealer Service Corp. v. Sharon D. Franklin Introduction In the landmark case of MS Dealer Service Corporation v....
Quiet Title Act Jurisdiction Limits: McMaster v. United States Commentary

Quiet Title Act Jurisdiction Limits: McMaster v. United States Commentary

Date: May 29, 1999
Quiet Title Act Jurisdiction Limits: McMaster v. United States Commentary Introduction In the case of Philip R. B. McMaster, Doctor, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus United States of America, Department...
Clover v. Total System Services: Participation Clause Protection and the Causation Requirement in Retaliation Claims

Clover v. Total System Services: Participation Clause Protection and the Causation Requirement in Retaliation Claims

Date: May 28, 1999
Clover v. Total System Services: Participation Clause Protection and the Causation Requirement in Retaliation Claims Introduction In CLOVER v. TOTAL SYSTEM SERVICES, INC. (176 F.3d 1346), the United...
First Amendment Restrictions on Zoning Ordinances for Adult Entertainment Establishments

First Amendment Restrictions on Zoning Ordinances for Adult Entertainment Establishments

Date: May 28, 1999
First Amendment Restrictions on Zoning Ordinances for Adult Entertainment Establishments Introduction The case of Lady J. Lingerie, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville addressed significant First Amendment...
United States v. Howerin: Expanding Definition of 'Property' for Forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7)

United States v. Howerin: Expanding Definition of 'Property' for Forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7)

Date: May 22, 1999
United States v. Howerin: Expanding Definition of 'Property' for Forfeiture under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Howerin, decided by the United States...
Scarfo v. Ginsberg: Clarifying Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Title VII's Single Employer Doctrine

Scarfo v. Ginsberg: Clarifying Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Title VII's Single Employer Doctrine

Date: May 15, 1999
Scarfo v. Ginsberg: Clarifying Subject Matter Jurisdiction Under Title VII's Single Employer Doctrine Introduction In Elaine A. Scarfo v. Victor Ginsberg et al., 175 F.3d 957 (11th Cir. 1999), the...
U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ De Varon: Upholding Clear Error Standard in Role Determination under §3B1.2

U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ De Varon: Upholding Clear Error Standard in Role Determination under §3B1.2

Date: May 15, 1999
U.S. v. RODRIGUEZ De Varon: Upholding Clear Error Standard in Role Determination under §3B1.2 Introduction United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon, decided on May 14, 1999, is a pivotal case in...
Recusal Standards and Expense Determinations in Legal Representation: An Analysis of United States v. F. Lee Bailey

Recusal Standards and Expense Determinations in Legal Representation: An Analysis of United States v. F. Lee Bailey

Date: May 15, 1999
Recusal Standards and Expense Determinations in Legal Representation: An Analysis of United States v. F. Lee Bailey Introduction In the case of United States of America v. F. Lee Bailey, adjudicated...
Jones v. Cannon: Establishing Boundaries of Police Immunity in False Arrest Claims

Jones v. Cannon: Establishing Boundaries of Police Immunity in False Arrest Claims

Date: May 12, 1999
Jones v. Cannon: Establishing Boundaries of Police Immunity in False Arrest Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Jonathan Dye Jones v. Lee Cannon, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops: Pruitt et al. v. United States

Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops: Pruitt et al. v. United States

Date: May 11, 1999
Enhanced Fourth Amendment Protections in Traffic Stops: Pruitt et al. v. United States Introduction The case of United States of America versus Tony Laverne Pruitt, Oscar Hernan Pena, Miguel A....
Super and Defensive Preemption Under ERISA: Insights from Simply Fashion v. Royal Maccabees

Super and Defensive Preemption Under ERISA: Insights from Simply Fashion v. Royal Maccabees

Date: May 11, 1999
Super and Defensive Preemption Under ERISA: Insights from Simply Fashion Stores Inc. v. Royal Maccabees Introduction The case of Annette Butero and Simply Fashion Stores Inc. versus Royal Maccabees...
Assessing Associational Standing for Advocacy Organizations under ADA: Analysis of Doe v. Stincer

Assessing Associational Standing for Advocacy Organizations under ADA: Analysis of Doe v. Stincer

Date: May 5, 1999
Assessing Associational Standing for Advocacy Organizations under ADA: Analysis of Doe v. Stincer Introduction The case of Chris Doe, et al. v. Carlos E. Stincer, Dr., et al., adjudicated by the...
Reversing Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Taylor v. United States Postal Service

Reversing Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Taylor v. United States Postal Service

Date: May 5, 1999
Reversing Gender Discrimination and Retaliation Claims: Taylor v. United States Postal Service Introduction The landmark case Cynthia L. Taylor v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States...
Finality of Conviction and the Mailbox Rule for Pro Se §2255 Motions: Insights from Adams v. United States

Finality of Conviction and the Mailbox Rule for Pro Se §2255 Motions: Insights from Adams v. United States

Date: Apr 28, 1999
Finality of Conviction and the Mailbox Rule for Pro Se §2255 Motions: Insights from Adams v. United States Introduction The case of Brady Lavick Adams v. United States, decided by the United States...
Navigating AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Guenther and Jackson v. Holt

Navigating AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Guenther and Jackson v. Holt

Date: Apr 28, 1999
Navigating AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Corpus Applications: Insights from Guenther and Jackson v. Holt Introduction The cases of Carl Francis Guenther and Samuel Jackson versus Arnold...
Validation of In-Trial Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Mosley

Validation of In-Trial Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Mosley

Date: Apr 27, 1999
Validation of In-Trial Guilty Pleas Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Mosley Introduction In the case of United States of America v....
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Bailey v. Nagle

Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Bailey v. Nagle

Date: Apr 21, 1999
Procedural Default and Habeas Corpus: Insights from Bailey v. Nagle Introduction Bailey v. Nagle, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on April 20, 1999, serves...
Lathem v. Department of Children and Youth Services: Establishing New Precedents in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Lathem v. Department of Children and Youth Services: Establishing New Precedents in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Date: Apr 15, 1999
Lathem v. Department of Children and Youth Services: Establishing New Precedents in Title VII Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Rhonda Ann Lathem v. Department of Children...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Detention Practices in Traffic Stops: Simmons v. United States (11th Cir. 1999)

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Detention Practices in Traffic Stops: Simmons v. United States (11th Cir. 1999)

Date: Apr 15, 1999
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Detention Practices in Traffic Stops: Simmons v. United States (11th Cir. 1999) Introduction Simmons v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert