Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Medical Needs Under the Eighth Amendment: Analysis of McElligott v. Foley

Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Medical Needs Under the Eighth Amendment: Analysis of McElligott v. Foley

Date: Aug 4, 1999
Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Medical Needs Under the Eighth Amendment: Analysis of McElligott v. Foley Introduction The case of Lauren Elmore McElligott, as Executrix of the Estate of Thomas...
Complete Preemption Doctrine Not Established: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in BLAB T.V. v. Comcast

Complete Preemption Doctrine Not Established: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in BLAB T.V. v. Comcast

Date: Jul 31, 1999
Complete Preemption Doctrine Not Established: Eleventh Circuit's Ruling in BLAB T.V. v. Comcast United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, 1999 Introduction The landmark case of BLAB T.V. OF...
Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Register et al.: Speedy Trial Rights, Counsel Conflicts, and Juror Misconduct

Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Register et al.: Speedy Trial Rights, Counsel Conflicts, and Juror Misconduct

Date: Jul 30, 1999
Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Register et al.: Speedy Trial Rights, Counsel Conflicts, and Juror Misconduct Introduction United States of America vs. Jubal Charles Register, Ronald Owen...
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements Upholds Securities Litigation Reform Act Protections: Harris v. Ivax Corp.

Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements Upholds Securities Litigation Reform Act Protections: Harris v. Ivax Corp.

Date: Jul 28, 1999
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements Upholds Securities Litigation Reform Act Protections: Harris v. Ivax Corp. Introduction Harris v. Ivax Corporation, 182 F.3d 799 (11th Cir. 1999), is a...
No Genuine Issue of Material Fact in Racial Discrimination Claims Under Title II and Section 1981

No Genuine Issue of Material Fact in Racial Discrimination Claims Under Title II and Section 1981

Date: Jul 27, 1999
No Genuine Issue of Material Fact in Racial Discrimination Claims Under Title II and Section 1981 Introduction In the case of Maryline LAROCHE, et al. v. DENNY'S, INC., et al., heard in the United...
Reaffirming the Zero-Discharge Standard under the Clean Water Act: Insights from Driscoll v. Adams

Reaffirming the Zero-Discharge Standard under the Clean Water Act: Insights from Driscoll v. Adams

Date: Jul 24, 1999
Reaffirming the Zero-Discharge Standard under the Clean Water Act: Insights from Driscoll v. Adams Introduction The case of David Barbara Driscoll and Ruel Patricia Galbreath v. Ross Adams (181 F.3d...
Limits on Manufacturer Liability for Non-Child-Proof Products Under Florida Law: Jennings v. BIC Corporation

Limits on Manufacturer Liability for Non-Child-Proof Products Under Florida Law: Jennings v. BIC Corporation

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Limits on Manufacturer Liability for Non-Child-Proof Products Under Florida Law: Jennings v. BIC Corporation Introduction In the case of Selma Jennings and Maximo Edwards v. BIC Corporation and...
Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Brady Violations - Long v. Satz et al.

Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Brady Violations - Long v. Satz et al.

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Affirmation of Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity in Brady Violations Long v. Satz et al., 181 F.3d 1275 (11th Cir. 1999) Introduction The case of Joanne Long, as guardian of John Gordon Purvis,...
Strict Interpretation of 'Disability' under the ADA Affirmed in Hilburn v. Murata

Strict Interpretation of 'Disability' under the ADA Affirmed in Hilburn v. Murata

Date: Jul 21, 1999
Strict Interpretation of 'Disability' under the ADA Affirmed in Hilburn v. Murata Introduction Linda Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc., 181 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limits of EX PARTE YOUNG in Abortion Statute Enforcement Challenges

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limits of EX PARTE YOUNG in Abortion Statute Enforcement Challenges

Date: Jul 16, 1999
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limits of EX PARTE YOUNG in Abortion Statute Enforcement Challenges Introduction The case of Summit Medical Associates, P.C., William Knorr, M.D., et al. v. Bill Pryor,...
Reevaluating the Stop-Time Rule: Insights from Roberto Tefel v. Janet Reno

Reevaluating the Stop-Time Rule: Insights from Roberto Tefel v. Janet Reno

Date: Jul 15, 1999
Reevaluating the Stop-Time Rule: Insights from Roberto Tefel v. Janet Reno Introduction The case of Roberto Tefel, et al. v. Janet Reno, et al. (180 F.3d 1286) presents a significant judicial...
Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Flewelling: Expanding the Scope of Restraining Orders under 18 U.S.C. § 1345(a)(2)

Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Flewelling: Expanding the Scope of Restraining Orders under 18 U.S.C. § 1345(a)(2)

Date: Jul 15, 1999
Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Flewelling: Expanding the Scope of Restraining Orders under 18 U.S.C. § 1345(a)(2) Introduction The case of United States of America v. Gary E. Flewelling...
Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Zapata and Lorenzo

Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Zapata and Lorenzo

Date: Jul 14, 1999
Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Zapata and Lorenzo Introduction The case of United States of America v. Victor Manuel Zapata and Juan Tomas Lorenzo, adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying the Start of the 90-Day Filing Period under ADA: Zillyette v. Capital One

Clarifying the Start of the 90-Day Filing Period under ADA: Zillyette v. Capital One

Date: Jul 8, 1999
Clarifying the Start of the 90-Day Filing Period under ADA: Zillyette v. Capital One Introduction Terry G. Zillyette v. Capital One Financial Corporation (179 F.3d 1337) is a landmark case decided by...
Clarifying the Application of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: Enhancements Based on Management Roles

Clarifying the Application of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: Enhancements Based on Management Roles

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Clarifying the Application of U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1: Enhancements Based on Management Roles Introduction The case of United States of America v. William D. Glover, Sr., William D. Glover, Jr., et al....
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and International Abstention: Comprehensive Analysis of Posner v. Essex Insurance Co.

Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and International Abstention: Comprehensive Analysis of Posner v. Essex Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Establishing Personal Jurisdiction and International Abstention: Comprehensive Analysis of Posner v. Essex Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Victor Posner, Security Management Corporation v....
Affirming Limits on Judicial Remedies in Racial Annexation Claims under Voting Rights Act

Affirming Limits on Judicial Remedies in Racial Annexation Claims under Voting Rights Act

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Affirming Limits on Judicial Remedies in Racial Annexation Claims under Voting Rights Act Introduction Burton v. City of Belle Glade, 178 F.3d 1175 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that...
Affirmation of Controlled Substance Dispensation Conviction While Vacating Sentencing Decision: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STEELE

Affirmation of Controlled Substance Dispensation Conviction While Vacating Sentencing Decision: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STEELE

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Affirmation of Controlled Substance Dispensation Conviction While Vacating Sentencing Decision: Insights from UNITED STATES v. STEELE 1. Introduction United States v. William O. Steele, 178 F.3d 1230...
Ineligibility for Suspension of Deportation Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation: Mejia Rodriguez v. Reno

Ineligibility for Suspension of Deportation Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation: Mejia Rodriguez v. Reno

Date: Jun 23, 1999
Ineligibility for Suspension of Deportation Does Not Constitute Due Process Violation: Mejia Rodriguez v. Reno Introduction In the landmark case of Ernesto Alonso Mejia Rodriguez v. Janet Reno, as...
Subjective Knowledge Requirement under Article 25 of the Warsaw Convention: Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines

Subjective Knowledge Requirement under Article 25 of the Warsaw Convention: Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines

Date: Jun 16, 1999
Subjective Knowledge Requirement under Article 25 of the Warsaw Convention: Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines Introduction Doris Cristina Piamba Cortes v. American Airlines, Inc. is a landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert