Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Interpretation of PLRA §1997e(e) Limited to Incarcerated Individuals: Insights from Harris v. Garner

Interpretation of PLRA §1997e(e) Limited to Incarcerated Individuals: Insights from Harris v. Garner

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Interpretation of PLRA §1997e(e) Limited to Incarcerated Individuals: Insights from Harris v. Garner Introduction Harris, Chadwick, et al. v. Garner et al. is a notable case adjudicated by the United...
Enhancing Supervision in Class Action Settlements: The Waters v. International Precious Metals Corporation Case

Enhancing Supervision in Class Action Settlements: The Waters v. International Precious Metals Corporation Case

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Enhancing Supervision in Class Action Settlements: The Waters v. International Precious Metals Corporation Case Introduction The case of Waters, Linda Bartholomew, indiv. v. International Precious...
Jones v. Apfel: VE Testimony Supersedes DOT in SSI Disability Determinations

Jones v. Apfel: VE Testimony Supersedes DOT in SSI Disability Determinations

Date: Sep 30, 1999
Jones v. Apfel: VE Testimony Supersedes DOT in SSI Disability Determinations Introduction In Christine Jones v. Kenneth S. Apfel, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Reevaluating Disability Claims Under ERISA: Whatley v. CNA Insurance Companies

Reevaluating Disability Claims Under ERISA: Whatley v. CNA Insurance Companies

Date: Sep 21, 1999
Reevaluating Disability Claims Under ERISA: Whatley v. CNA Insurance Companies Introduction The case of Roger Whatley, Sr. v. CNA Insurance Companies, Baker Brothers, Incorporated, et al. addresses...
Qualified Immunity in Warrantless Administrative Searches: Crosby v. Winningham

Qualified Immunity in Warrantless Administrative Searches: Crosby v. Winningham

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Qualified Immunity in Warrantless Administrative Searches: Crosby v. Winningham Introduction The case of Joe Crosby, Leverne Crosby, and Rick Crosby v. Ashley Paulk, J.R. Winningham, Terry Griffin,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scienter Standard and Judicial Notice of SEC Filings under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scienter Standard and Judicial Notice of SEC Filings under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Scienter Standard and Judicial Notice of SEC Filings under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Introduction In John Bryant, et al. v. Avado Brands, Inc., et al.,...
Direct Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Wright v. Southland Corp.

Direct Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Wright v. Southland Corp.

Date: Sep 4, 1999
Direct Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Insights from Wright v. Southland Corp. Introduction Wright v. Southland Corporation, 187 F.3d 1287 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that has...
Affirmation of Employer's Layoff Procedures in Age Discrimination Claims: Mitchell v. USBI Company

Affirmation of Employer's Layoff Procedures in Age Discrimination Claims: Mitchell v. USBI Company

Date: Sep 2, 1999
Affirmation of Employer's Layoff Procedures in Age Discrimination Claims: Mitchell v. USBI Company Introduction The case of Raymond Mitchell v. USBI Company, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Direct Causation in Discriminatory Terminations: Stimpson v. City of Tuscaloosa Sets Precedent

Direct Causation in Discriminatory Terminations: Stimpson v. City of Tuscaloosa Sets Precedent

Date: Aug 31, 1999
Direct Causation in Discriminatory Terminations: Stimpson v. City of Tuscaloosa Sets Precedent Introduction Sandra Leigh Stimpson, a long-serving police officer in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, found herself...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Employment Discrimination: CRAWFORD v. BABBITT

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Employment Discrimination: CRAWFORD v. BABBITT

Date: Aug 31, 1999
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Employment Discrimination: CRAWFORD v. BABBITT Introduction CRAWFORD v. BABBITT, 186 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case addressing the procedural...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analysis of Williams v. Head

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analysis of Williams v. Head

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Analysis of Williams v. Head Introduction The case of Alexander E. Williams, IV v. Frederick J. Head ([1999] 185 F.3d 1223) addresses the critical...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Part-Time Work Considerations in Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Part-Time Work Considerations in Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Part-Time Work Considerations in Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act Introduction In the case of Stephen A. Kelley, Jr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, the United...
Rehabilitation Act Employment Discrimination: Sutton v. Small Business Administration

Rehabilitation Act Employment Discrimination: Sutton v. Small Business Administration

Date: Aug 26, 1999
Rehabilitation Act Employment Discrimination: Sutton v. Small Business Administration Introduction In the case of Robert A. Sutton v. Philip Lader, Administrator of the Small Business Administration...
Three Strikes Rule in Forma Pauperis: Affirmation in Medberry v. Butler

Three Strikes Rule in Forma Pauperis: Affirmation in Medberry v. Butler

Date: Aug 24, 1999
Three Strikes Rule in Forma Pauperis: Affirmation in Medberry v. Butler Introduction The case of Daniel C. Medberry v. Joe Butler et al. addresses significant issues regarding the application of the...
Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustee's Authority to Challenge Perfected Mortgage Assignments: Halabi v. Atlantic Mortgage and FHLC

Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustee's Authority to Challenge Perfected Mortgage Assignments: Halabi v. Atlantic Mortgage and FHLC

Date: Aug 21, 1999
Limitations on Bankruptcy Trustee's Authority to Challenge Perfected Mortgage Assignments: Halabi v. Atlantic Mortgage and FHLC Introduction The case of In re: Tarek Halabi a.k.a. Tito Halabi,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment and Daubert Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Allison v. 3M/McGhan

Affirmation of Summary Judgment and Daubert Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Allison v. 3M/McGhan

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment and Daubert Exclusion of Expert Testimony in Allison v. 3M/McGhan Introduction Allison v. 3M/McGhan is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Improper Admission of Prejudicial Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct: United States v. Hands

Improper Admission of Prejudicial Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct: United States v. Hands

Date: Aug 19, 1999
Improper Admission of Prejudicial Evidence and Prosecutorial Misconduct: United States v. Hands Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Eddie Roosevelt Hands, adjudicated by...
Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Federal Rules Prevail over State Statutes

Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Federal Rules Prevail over State Statutes

Date: Aug 18, 1999
Punitive Damages in Diversity Jurisdiction: Federal Rules Prevail over State Statutes Introduction The case of Cheryl Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc. (184 F.3d 1292) adjudicated by the United States...
Reaffirmation of Collins v. City of Harker Heights: Limiting Government Employer Liability under Substantive Due Process

Reaffirmation of Collins v. City of Harker Heights: Limiting Government Employer Liability under Substantive Due Process

Date: Aug 11, 1999
Reaffirmation of Collins v. City of Harker Heights: Limiting Government Employer Liability under Substantive Due Process Introduction In the landmark case of Phyillis White and William Rostad v. Bill...
Termination Rights under 17 U.S.C. §203 for Implied Nonexclusive Licenses: Korman v. HBC Florida

Termination Rights under 17 U.S.C. §203 for Implied Nonexclusive Licenses: Korman v. HBC Florida

Date: Aug 6, 1999
Termination Rights under 17 U.S.C. §203 for Implied Nonexclusive Licenses: Korman v. HBC Florida Introduction In the landmark case of Mimi Korman v. HBC Florida, Inc. (182 F.3d 1291), the United...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert