Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Burden of Evidence in Employment Discrimination: JONES v. BESSEMER CARRAWAY MEDICAL CENTER

Clarifying the Burden of Evidence in Employment Discrimination: JONES v. BESSEMER CARRAWAY MEDICAL CENTER

Date: Aug 25, 1998
Clarifying the Burden of Evidence in Employment Discrimination: Patricia A. JONES v. BESSEMER CARRAWAY MEDICAL CENTER Introduction Patricia A. JONES v. BESSEMER CARRAWAY MEDICAL CENTER, 151 F.3d 1321...
Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefits Appeals: Falge v. Apfel

Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefits Appeals: Falge v. Apfel

Date: Aug 15, 1998
Substantial Evidence Standard in Disability Benefits Appeals: Falge v. Apfel Introduction The case of Jay C. Falge, Jr. v. Kenneth S. Apfel, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Jurisdictional Limitations on Sentence Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. §851: Insights from Harris v. United States

Jurisdictional Limitations on Sentence Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. §851: Insights from Harris v. United States

Date: Aug 14, 1998
Jurisdictional Limitations on Sentence Enhancements under 21 U.S.C. §851: Insights from Harris v. United States Introduction Roy Anthony Harris v. United States of America, 149 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir....
Provenzano v. Singletary: Affirming Deference to Strategic Counsel Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Provenzano v. Singletary: Affirming Deference to Strategic Counsel Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Aug 7, 1998
Provenzano v. Singletary: Affirming Deference to Strategic Counsel Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction The case Thomas Harrison Provenzano, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harry K....
U.S. Securities Anti-Waiver Provisions Do Not Nullify International Choice Clauses: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Enforceability

U.S. Securities Anti-Waiver Provisions Do Not Nullify International Choice Clauses: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Enforceability

Date: Aug 6, 1998
U.S. Securities Anti-Waiver Provisions Do Not Nullify International Choice Clauses: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Enforceability Introduction The case of Irmgard Lipcon et al. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's,...
Express and Activity-Specific Incidental Take Permits under the Endangered Species Act: Insights from Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County Council

Express and Activity-Specific Incidental Take Permits under the Endangered Species Act: Insights from Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County Council

Date: Aug 4, 1998
Express and Activity-Specific Incidental Take Permits under the Endangered Species Act: Insights from Loggerhead Turtle v. Volusia County Council Introduction The case of Loggerhead Turtle (Caretta...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Absence of a Clearly Established Constitutional Duty: Santamorenana v. Georgia Military College

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Absence of a Clearly Established Constitutional Duty: Santamorenana v. Georgia Military College

Date: Aug 1, 1998
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in the Absence of a Clearly Established Constitutional Duty: Santamorenana v. Georgia Military College Introduction In the case of Santamorenana v. Georgia Military...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Final Judgment Rule: Partial Summary Judgment Appeal Dismissed in CAL v. FCC

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Final Judgment Rule: Partial Summary Judgment Appeal Dismissed in CAL v. FCC

Date: Aug 1, 1998
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Final Judgment Rule: Partial Summary Judgment Appeal Dismissed in CAL v. FCC Introduction In the case of Construction Aggregates, Ltd. (CAL) v. Forest Commodities...
ERISA Preemption Clarified: Absence of a Valid Plan at Termination - Whitt v. Sherman International Corp.

ERISA Preemption Clarified: Absence of a Valid Plan at Termination - Whitt v. Sherman International Corp.

Date: Jul 31, 1998
ERISA Preemption Clarified: Absence of a Valid Plan at Termination - Whitt v. Sherman International Corp. Introduction The case of William O'Neal Whitt, Jr. v. Sherman International Corporation, et...
UNITED STATES v. STEELE: Indictment Sufficiency for Controlled Substance Dispensation

UNITED STATES v. STEELE: Indictment Sufficiency for Controlled Substance Dispensation

Date: Jul 30, 1998
UNITED STATES v. STEELE: Indictment Sufficiency for Controlled Substance Dispensation Introduction United States of America v. William O. Steele is a landmark case decided by the United States Court...
Preliminary Injunctions in Franchise Termination: McDonald's Corp. v. Robertson

Preliminary Injunctions in Franchise Termination: McDonald's Corp. v. Robertson

Date: Jul 29, 1998
Preliminary Injunctions in Franchise Termination: McDonald's Corporation v. Robertson Introduction The case of McDonald's Corporation v. Roger Robertson and Marilyn Robertson (147 F.3d 1301)...
Federal Preemption of State Tort Standards in Nuclear Radiation Exposure Claims: Roberts v. Florida Power Light

Federal Preemption of State Tort Standards in Nuclear Radiation Exposure Claims: Roberts v. Florida Power Light

Date: Jul 23, 1998
Federal Preemption of State Tort Standards in Nuclear Radiation Exposure Claims: Roberts v. Florida Power Light Introduction In the landmark case of Bertram Roberts, Hanni Roberts v. Florida Power...
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Ross v. Rhodes Furniture: Implications for Rule 50 Motions and Employment Discrimination Claims

Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Ross v. Rhodes Furniture: Implications for Rule 50 Motions and Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Jul 21, 1998
Reinstatement of Jury Verdict in Ross v. Rhodes Furniture: Implications for Rule 50 Motions and Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Arthur Ross v. Rhodes Furniture, Incorporated...
Clarification on 'Career Offender' Status and Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Hernandez

Clarification on 'Career Offender' Status and Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Hernandez

Date: Jul 18, 1998
Clarification on 'Career Offender' Status and Sentencing Enhancements: Analysis of United States v. Hernandez Introduction The case of United States of America v. Modesto Hernandez, decided by the...
Adverse Employment Action Standards Under the ADA: Insights from John Doe v. DeKalb County School District

Adverse Employment Action Standards Under the ADA: Insights from John Doe v. DeKalb County School District

Date: Jul 18, 1998
Adverse Employment Action Standards Under the ADA: Insights from John Doe v. DeKalb County School District Introduction The case of John Doe v. DeKalb County School District, decided by the United...
FRSA Preemption Affirmed: State Law Claims Overruled in Railroad Crossing Negligence Case

FRSA Preemption Affirmed: State Law Claims Overruled in Railroad Crossing Negligence Case

Date: Jul 17, 1998
FRSA Preemption Affirmed: State Law Claims Overruled in Railroad Crossing Negligence Case Introduction In the landmark case of Ingram v. CSX Transportation, Inc. and City of Albertville, decided by...
Defining 'Qualified Individual' and 'Direct Threat' Under ADA: The LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc. Decision

Defining 'Qualified Individual' and 'Direct Threat' Under ADA: The LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc. Decision

Date: Jul 15, 1998
Defining 'Qualified Individual' and 'Direct Threat' Under ADA: The LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc. Decision Introduction In the landmark case of Mathew P. LaChance v. Duffy's Draft House, Inc.,...
Affirmation of District Court's Discretionary Decisions in Trujillo and Fuentes Appeals

Affirmation of District Court's Discretionary Decisions in Trujillo and Fuentes Appeals

Date: Jul 15, 1998
Affirmation of District Court's Discretionary Decisions in Trujillo and Fuentes Appeals Introduction The case of United States of America v. Raul Trujillo and Francisco Nelson Fuentes involves...
Enforcement of Fraudulent Inducement Claims Under the Economic Loss Rule: Insights from FCOM v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Enforcement of Fraudulent Inducement Claims Under the Economic Loss Rule: Insights from FCOM v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Date: Jul 9, 1998
Enforcement of Fraudulent Inducement Claims Under the Economic Loss Rule: Insights from FLORIDA COLLEGE OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, INC. v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS INC. Introduction The case of FLORIDA...
Appellate Scope Limited to Certificate of Appealability Issues: Murray v. United States

Appellate Scope Limited to Certificate of Appealability Issues: Murray v. United States

Date: Jul 8, 1998
Appellate Scope Limited to Certificate of Appealability Issues: Murray v. United States Introduction The case of Jason Todd Murray v. United States (145 F.3d 1249) before the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert